Commit dc37bb8d authored by Theodore Ts'o's avatar Theodore Ts'o Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

ext4: don't BUG when truncating encrypted inodes on the orphan list

commit 0d06863f upstream.

Fix a BUG when the kernel tries to mount a file system constructed as
follows:

echo foo > foo.txt
mke2fs -Fq -t ext4 -O encrypt foo.img 100
debugfs -w foo.img << EOF
write foo.txt a
set_inode_field a i_flags 0x80800
set_super_value s_last_orphan 12
quit
EOF

root@kvm-xfstests:~# mount -o loop foo.img /mnt
[  160.238770] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[  160.240106] kernel BUG at /usr/projects/linux/ext4/fs/ext4/inode.c:3874!
[  160.240106] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
[  160.240106] Modules linked in:
[  160.240106] CPU: 0 PID: 2547 Comm: mount Tainted: G        W       4.10.0-rc3-00034-gcdd33b941b67 #227
[  160.240106] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.1-1 04/01/2014
[  160.240106] task: f4518000 task.stack: f47b6000
[  160.240106] EIP: ext4_block_zero_page_range+0x1a7/0x2b4
[  160.240106] EFLAGS: 00010246 CPU: 0
[  160.240106] EAX: 00000001 EBX: f7be4b50 ECX: f47b7dc0 EDX: 00000007
[  160.240106] ESI: f43b05a8 EDI: f43babec EBP: f47b7dd0 ESP: f47b7dac
[  160.240106]  DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0033 SS: 0068
[  160.240106] CR0: 80050033 CR2: bfd85b08 CR3: 34a00680 CR4: 000006f0
[  160.240106] Call Trace:
[  160.240106]  ext4_truncate+0x1e9/0x3e5
[  160.240106]  ext4_fill_super+0x286f/0x2b1e
[  160.240106]  ? set_blocksize+0x2e/0x7e
[  160.240106]  mount_bdev+0x114/0x15f
[  160.240106]  ext4_mount+0x15/0x17
[  160.240106]  ? ext4_calculate_overhead+0x39d/0x39d
[  160.240106]  mount_fs+0x58/0x115
[  160.240106]  vfs_kern_mount+0x4b/0xae
[  160.240106]  do_mount+0x671/0x8c3
[  160.240106]  ? _copy_from_user+0x70/0x83
[  160.240106]  ? strndup_user+0x31/0x46
[  160.240106]  SyS_mount+0x57/0x7b
[  160.240106]  do_int80_syscall_32+0x4f/0x61
[  160.240106]  entry_INT80_32+0x2f/0x2f
[  160.240106] EIP: 0xb76b919e
[  160.240106] EFLAGS: 00000246 CPU: 0
[  160.240106] EAX: ffffffda EBX: 08053838 ECX: 08052188 EDX: 080537e8
[  160.240106] ESI: c0ed0000 EDI: 00000000 EBP: 080537e8 ESP: bfa13660
[  160.240106]  DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 0033 SS: 007b
[  160.240106] Code: 59 8b 00 a8 01 0f 84 09 01 00 00 8b 07 66 25 00 f0 66 3d 00 80 75 61 89 f8 e8 3e e2 ff ff 84 c0 74 56 83 bf 48 02 00 00 00 75 02 <0f> 0b 81 7d e8 00 10 00 00 74 02 0f 0b 8b 43 04 8b 53 08 31 c9
[  160.240106] EIP: ext4_block_zero_page_range+0x1a7/0x2b4 SS:ESP: 0068:f47b7dac
[  160.317241] ---[ end trace d6a773a375c810a5 ]---

The problem is that when the kernel tries to truncate an inode in
ext4_truncate(), it tries to clear any on-disk data beyond i_size.
Without the encryption key, it can't do that, and so it triggers a
BUG.

E2fsck does *not* provide this service, and in practice most file
systems have their orphan list processed by e2fsck, so to avoid
crashing, this patch skips this step if we don't have access to the
encryption key (which is the case when processing the orphan list; in
all other cases, we will have the encryption key, or the kernel
wouldn't have allowed the file to be opened).

An open question is whether the fact that e2fsck isn't clearing the
bytes beyond i_size causing problems --- and if we've lived with it
not doing it for so long, can we drop this from the kernel replay of
the orphan list in all cases (not just when we don't have the key for
encrypted inodes).

Addresses-Google-Bug: #35209576
Signed-off-by: default avatarTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: default avatarEric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent 1cda2908
......@@ -3927,6 +3927,10 @@ static int ext4_block_truncate_page(handle_t *handle,
unsigned blocksize;
struct inode *inode = mapping->host;
/* If we are processing an encrypted inode during orphan list handling */
if (ext4_encrypted_inode(inode) && !fscrypt_has_encryption_key(inode))
return 0;
blocksize = inode->i_sb->s_blocksize;
length = blocksize - (offset & (blocksize - 1));
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment