bcache: reap from tail of c->btree_cache in bch_mca_scan()

When shrink btree node cache from c->btree_cache in bch_mca_scan(),
no matter the selected node is reaped or not, it will be rotated from
the head to the tail of c->btree_cache list. But in bcache journal
code, when flushing the btree nodes with oldest journal entry, btree
nodes are iterated and slected from the tail of c->btree_cache list in
btree_flush_write(). The list_rotate_left() in bch_mca_scan() will
make btree_flush_write() iterate more nodes in c->btree_list in reverse
order.

This patch just reaps the selected btree node cache, and not move it
from the head to the tail of c->btree_cache list. Then bch_mca_scan()
will not mess up c->btree_cache list to btree_flush_write().
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

drivers/md/bcache/btree.c

@@ -747,19 +747,19 @@ static unsigned long bch_mca_scan(struct shrinker *shrink,
 		i++;
 	}
 
-	for (;  (nr--) && i < btree_cache_used; i++) {
-		if (list_empty(&c->btree_cache))
+	list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(b, t, &c->btree_cache, list) {
+		if (nr <= 0 || i >= btree_cache_used)
 			goto out;
 
-		b = list_first_entry(&c->btree_cache, struct btree, list);
-		list_rotate_left(&c->btree_cache);
-
 		if (!mca_reap(b, 0, false)) {
 			mca_bucket_free(b);
 			mca_data_free(b);
 			rw_unlock(true, b);
 			freed++;
 		}
+
+		nr--;
+		i++;
 	}
 out:
 	mutex_unlock(&c->bucket_lock);