Commit ede7c460 authored by Naveen N. Rao's avatar Naveen N. Rao Committed by Daniel Borkmann

bpf: handle 32-bit zext during constant blinding

Since BPF constant blinding is performed after the verifier pass, the
ALU32 instructions inserted for doubleword immediate loads don't have a
corresponding zext instruction. This is causing a kernel oops on powerpc
and can be reproduced by running 'test_cgroup_storage' with
bpf_jit_harden=2.

Fix this by emitting BPF_ZEXT during constant blinding if
prog->aux->verifier_zext is set.

Fixes: a4b1d3c1 ("bpf: verifier: insert zero extension according to analysis result")
Reported-by: default avatarMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: default avatarNaveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarJiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
parent 86c28b2d
...@@ -890,7 +890,8 @@ int bpf_jit_get_func_addr(const struct bpf_prog *prog, ...@@ -890,7 +890,8 @@ int bpf_jit_get_func_addr(const struct bpf_prog *prog,
static int bpf_jit_blind_insn(const struct bpf_insn *from, static int bpf_jit_blind_insn(const struct bpf_insn *from,
const struct bpf_insn *aux, const struct bpf_insn *aux,
struct bpf_insn *to_buff) struct bpf_insn *to_buff,
bool emit_zext)
{ {
struct bpf_insn *to = to_buff; struct bpf_insn *to = to_buff;
u32 imm_rnd = get_random_int(); u32 imm_rnd = get_random_int();
...@@ -1005,6 +1006,8 @@ static int bpf_jit_blind_insn(const struct bpf_insn *from, ...@@ -1005,6 +1006,8 @@ static int bpf_jit_blind_insn(const struct bpf_insn *from,
case 0: /* Part 2 of BPF_LD | BPF_IMM | BPF_DW. */ case 0: /* Part 2 of BPF_LD | BPF_IMM | BPF_DW. */
*to++ = BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_AX, imm_rnd ^ aux[0].imm); *to++ = BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_MOV, BPF_REG_AX, imm_rnd ^ aux[0].imm);
*to++ = BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_XOR, BPF_REG_AX, imm_rnd); *to++ = BPF_ALU32_IMM(BPF_XOR, BPF_REG_AX, imm_rnd);
if (emit_zext)
*to++ = BPF_ZEXT_REG(BPF_REG_AX);
*to++ = BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_OR, aux[0].dst_reg, BPF_REG_AX); *to++ = BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_OR, aux[0].dst_reg, BPF_REG_AX);
break; break;
...@@ -1088,7 +1091,8 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_jit_blind_constants(struct bpf_prog *prog) ...@@ -1088,7 +1091,8 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_jit_blind_constants(struct bpf_prog *prog)
insn[1].code == 0) insn[1].code == 0)
memcpy(aux, insn, sizeof(aux)); memcpy(aux, insn, sizeof(aux));
rewritten = bpf_jit_blind_insn(insn, aux, insn_buff); rewritten = bpf_jit_blind_insn(insn, aux, insn_buff,
clone->aux->verifier_zext);
if (!rewritten) if (!rewritten)
continue; continue;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment