Commit effd120e authored by David Chinner's avatar David Chinner Committed by Tim Shimmin

[XFS] Map unwritten extents correctly for I/o completion processing

If we have multiple unwritten extents within a single page, we fail to
tell the I/o completion construction handlers we need a new handle for the
second and subsequent blocks in the page. While we still issue the I/O
correctly, we do not have the correct ranges recorded in the ioend
structures and hence when we go to convert the unwritten extents we screw
it up.

Make sure we start a new ioend every time the mapping changes so that we
convert the correct ranges on I/O completion.

SGI-PV: 964647
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:28797a
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarChristoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarTim Shimmin <tes@sgi.com>
parent 45c34141
......@@ -1010,6 +1010,8 @@ xfs_page_state_convert(
if (buffer_unwritten(bh) || buffer_delay(bh) ||
((buffer_uptodate(bh) || PageUptodate(page)) &&
!buffer_mapped(bh) && (unmapped || startio))) {
int new_ioend = 0;
/*
* Make sure we don't use a read-only iomap
*/
......@@ -1028,6 +1030,15 @@ xfs_page_state_convert(
}
if (!iomap_valid) {
/*
* if we didn't have a valid mapping then we
* need to ensure that we put the new mapping
* in a new ioend structure. This needs to be
* done to ensure that the ioends correctly
* reflect the block mappings at io completion
* for unwritten extent conversion.
*/
new_ioend = 1;
if (type == IOMAP_NEW) {
size = xfs_probe_cluster(inode,
page, bh, head, 0);
......@@ -1047,7 +1058,7 @@ xfs_page_state_convert(
if (startio) {
xfs_add_to_ioend(inode, bh, offset,
type, &ioend,
!iomap_valid);
new_ioend);
} else {
set_buffer_dirty(bh);
unlock_buffer(bh);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment