Commit f1dfdab6 authored by Chris Wilson's avatar Chris Wilson Committed by Ingo Molnar

sched/vtime: Prevent unstable evaluation of WARN(vtime->state)

As the vtime is sampled under loose seqcount protection by kcpustat, the
vtime fields may change as the code flows. Where logic dictates a field
has a static value, use a READ_ONCE.
Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: default avatarFrederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Fixes: 74722bb2 ("sched/vtime: Bring up complete kcpustat accessor")
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200123180849.28486-1-frederic@kernel.org
parent 1b10d388
......@@ -909,8 +909,10 @@ void task_cputime(struct task_struct *t, u64 *utime, u64 *stime)
} while (read_seqcount_retry(&vtime->seqcount, seq));
}
static int vtime_state_check(struct vtime *vtime, int cpu)
static int vtime_state_fetch(struct vtime *vtime, int cpu)
{
int state = READ_ONCE(vtime->state);
/*
* We raced against a context switch, fetch the
* kcpustat task again.
......@@ -927,10 +929,10 @@ static int vtime_state_check(struct vtime *vtime, int cpu)
*
* Case 1) is ok but 2) is not. So wait for a safe VTIME state.
*/
if (vtime->state == VTIME_INACTIVE)
if (state == VTIME_INACTIVE)
return -EAGAIN;
return 0;
return state;
}
static u64 kcpustat_user_vtime(struct vtime *vtime)
......@@ -949,14 +951,15 @@ static int kcpustat_field_vtime(u64 *cpustat,
{
struct vtime *vtime = &tsk->vtime;
unsigned int seq;
int err;
do {
int state;
seq = read_seqcount_begin(&vtime->seqcount);
err = vtime_state_check(vtime, cpu);
if (err < 0)
return err;
state = vtime_state_fetch(vtime, cpu);
if (state < 0)
return state;
*val = cpustat[usage];
......@@ -969,7 +972,7 @@ static int kcpustat_field_vtime(u64 *cpustat,
*/
switch (usage) {
case CPUTIME_SYSTEM:
if (vtime->state == VTIME_SYS)
if (state == VTIME_SYS)
*val += vtime->stime + vtime_delta(vtime);
break;
case CPUTIME_USER:
......@@ -981,11 +984,11 @@ static int kcpustat_field_vtime(u64 *cpustat,
*val += kcpustat_user_vtime(vtime);
break;
case CPUTIME_GUEST:
if (vtime->state == VTIME_GUEST && task_nice(tsk) <= 0)
if (state == VTIME_GUEST && task_nice(tsk) <= 0)
*val += vtime->gtime + vtime_delta(vtime);
break;
case CPUTIME_GUEST_NICE:
if (vtime->state == VTIME_GUEST && task_nice(tsk) > 0)
if (state == VTIME_GUEST && task_nice(tsk) > 0)
*val += vtime->gtime + vtime_delta(vtime);
break;
default:
......@@ -1036,23 +1039,23 @@ static int kcpustat_cpu_fetch_vtime(struct kernel_cpustat *dst,
{
struct vtime *vtime = &tsk->vtime;
unsigned int seq;
int err;
do {
u64 *cpustat;
u64 delta;
int state;
seq = read_seqcount_begin(&vtime->seqcount);
err = vtime_state_check(vtime, cpu);
if (err < 0)
return err;
state = vtime_state_fetch(vtime, cpu);
if (state < 0)
return state;
*dst = *src;
cpustat = dst->cpustat;
/* Task is sleeping, dead or idle, nothing to add */
if (vtime->state < VTIME_SYS)
if (state < VTIME_SYS)
continue;
delta = vtime_delta(vtime);
......@@ -1061,15 +1064,15 @@ static int kcpustat_cpu_fetch_vtime(struct kernel_cpustat *dst,
* Task runs either in user (including guest) or kernel space,
* add pending nohz time to the right place.
*/
if (vtime->state == VTIME_SYS) {
if (state == VTIME_SYS) {
cpustat[CPUTIME_SYSTEM] += vtime->stime + delta;
} else if (vtime->state == VTIME_USER) {
} else if (state == VTIME_USER) {
if (task_nice(tsk) > 0)
cpustat[CPUTIME_NICE] += vtime->utime + delta;
else
cpustat[CPUTIME_USER] += vtime->utime + delta;
} else {
WARN_ON_ONCE(vtime->state != VTIME_GUEST);
WARN_ON_ONCE(state != VTIME_GUEST);
if (task_nice(tsk) > 0) {
cpustat[CPUTIME_GUEST_NICE] += vtime->gtime + delta;
cpustat[CPUTIME_NICE] += vtime->gtime + delta;
......@@ -1080,7 +1083,7 @@ static int kcpustat_cpu_fetch_vtime(struct kernel_cpustat *dst,
}
} while (read_seqcount_retry(&vtime->seqcount, seq));
return err;
return 0;
}
void kcpustat_cpu_fetch(struct kernel_cpustat *dst, int cpu)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment