NFS: Fix another OPEN_DOWNGRADE bug

commit e547f262 upstream.

Olga Kornievskaia reports that the following test fails to trigger
an OPEN_DOWNGRADE on the wire, and only triggers the final CLOSE.

	fd0 = open(foo, RDRW)   -- should be open on the wire for "both"
	fd1 = open(foo, RDONLY)  -- should be open on the wire for "read"
	close(fd0) -- should trigger an open_downgrade
	read(fd1)
	close(fd1)

The issue is that we're missing a check for whether or not the current
state transitioned from an O_RDWR state as opposed to having transitioned
from a combination of O_RDONLY and O_WRONLY.
Reported-by: Olga Kornievskaia <aglo@umich.edu>
Fixes: cd9288ff ("NFSv4: Fix another bug in the close/open_downgrade code")
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
[bwh: Backported to 3.2: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>

fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c

@@ -2025,12 +2025,11 @@ static void nfs4_close_prepare(struct rpc_task *task, void *data)
 			call_close |= is_wronly;
 		else if (is_wronly)
 			calldata->arg.fmode |= FMODE_WRITE;
+		if (calldata->arg.fmode != (FMODE_READ|FMODE_WRITE))
+			call_close |= is_rdwr;
 	} else if (is_rdwr)
 		calldata->arg.fmode |= FMODE_READ|FMODE_WRITE;
 
-	if (calldata->arg.fmode == 0)
-		call_close |= is_rdwr;
-
 	spin_unlock(&state->owner->so_lock);
 
 	if (!call_close) {