Commit fa82a491 authored by Jeff Layton's avatar Jeff Layton Committed by J. Bruce Fields

nfsd: only set file_lock.fl_lmops in nfsd4_lockt if a stateowner is found

nfsd4_lockt does a search for a lockstateowner when building the lock
struct to test. If one is found, it'll set fl_owner to it. Regardless of
whether that happens, it'll also set fl_lmops. Given that this lock is
basically a "lightweight" lock that's just used for checking conflicts,
setting fl_lmops is probably not appropriate for it.

This behavior exposed a bug in DLM's GETLK implementation where it
wasn't clearing out the fields in the file_lock before filling in
conflicting lock info. While we were able to fix this in DLM, it
still seems pointless and dangerous to set the fl_lmops this way
when we may have a NULL lockstateowner.
Signed-off-by: default avatarJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@pig.fieldses.org>
parent b914152a
...@@ -2871,7 +2871,6 @@ nfsd4_lockt(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate, ...@@ -2871,7 +2871,6 @@ nfsd4_lockt(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nfsd4_compound_state *cstate,
file_lock.fl_owner = (fl_owner_t)lockt->lt_stateowner; file_lock.fl_owner = (fl_owner_t)lockt->lt_stateowner;
file_lock.fl_pid = current->tgid; file_lock.fl_pid = current->tgid;
file_lock.fl_flags = FL_POSIX; file_lock.fl_flags = FL_POSIX;
file_lock.fl_lmops = &nfsd_posix_mng_ops;
file_lock.fl_start = lockt->lt_offset; file_lock.fl_start = lockt->lt_offset;
file_lock.fl_end = last_byte_offset(lockt->lt_offset, lockt->lt_length); file_lock.fl_end = last_byte_offset(lockt->lt_offset, lockt->lt_length);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment