Commit ff5df9b8 authored by Filipe Manana's avatar Filipe Manana Committed by Chris Mason

Btrfs: ioctl, don't re-lock extent range when not necessary

In ioctl.c:lock_extent_range(), after locking our target range, the
ordered extent that btrfs_lookup_first_ordered_extent() returns us
may not overlap our target range at all. In this case we would just
unlock our target range, wait for any new ordered extents that overlap
the range to complete, lock again the range and repeat all these steps
until we don't get any ordered extent and the delalloc flag isn't set
in the io tree for our target range.

Therefore just stop if we get an ordered extent that doesn't overlap
our target range and the dealalloc flag isn't set for the range in
the inode's io tree.
Signed-off-by: default avatarFilipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
parent 2c463823
......@@ -2700,10 +2700,15 @@ static inline void lock_extent_range(struct inode *inode, u64 off, u64 len)
lock_extent(&BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree, off, off + len - 1);
ordered = btrfs_lookup_first_ordered_extent(inode,
off + len - 1);
if (!ordered &&
if ((!ordered ||
ordered->file_offset + ordered->len <= off ||
ordered->file_offset >= off + len) &&
!test_range_bit(&BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree, off,
off + len - 1, EXTENT_DELALLOC, 0, NULL))
off + len - 1, EXTENT_DELALLOC, 0, NULL)) {
if (ordered)
btrfs_put_ordered_extent(ordered);
break;
}
unlock_extent(&BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree, off, off + len - 1);
if (ordered)
btrfs_put_ordered_extent(ordered);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment