Commit ffa358dc authored by Jens Axboe's avatar Jens Axboe

blk-wbt: move disable check into get_limit()

Check it in one place, instead of in multiple places.
Tested-by: default avatarAnchal Agarwal <anchalag@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
parent 3943b040
......@@ -449,6 +449,13 @@ static inline unsigned int get_limit(struct rq_wb *rwb, unsigned long rw)
{
unsigned int limit;
/*
* If we got disabled, just return UINT_MAX. This ensures that
* we'll properly inc a new IO, and dec+wakeup at the end.
*/
if (!rwb_enabled(rwb))
return UINT_MAX;
if ((rw & REQ_OP_MASK) == REQ_OP_DISCARD)
return rwb->wb_background;
......@@ -486,16 +493,6 @@ static void __wbt_wait(struct rq_wb *rwb, enum wbt_flags wb_acct,
struct rq_wait *rqw = get_rq_wait(rwb, wb_acct);
DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, current);
/*
* inc it here even if disabled, since we'll dec it at completion.
* this only happens if the task was sleeping in __wbt_wait(),
* and someone turned it off at the same time.
*/
if (!rwb_enabled(rwb)) {
atomic_inc(&rqw->inflight);
return;
}
if (!waitqueue_active(&rqw->wait)
&& rq_wait_inc_below(rqw, get_limit(rwb, rw)))
return;
......@@ -504,11 +501,6 @@ static void __wbt_wait(struct rq_wb *rwb, enum wbt_flags wb_acct,
do {
set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
if (!rwb_enabled(rwb)) {
atomic_inc(&rqw->inflight);
break;
}
if (rq_wait_inc_below(rqw, get_limit(rwb, rw)))
break;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment