- 05 Jun, 2014 12 commits
-
-
Giedrius Rekasius authored
Variable "rt_rq" is used only in block "for_each_sched_rt_entity" so the value assigned to it at the beginning of the update_curr_rt(...) gets overwritten without ever being read. Remove redundant assignment and move variable declaration to the block in which it is being used. Signed-off-by:
Giedrius Rekasius <giedrius.rekasius@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1401027811-30066-1-git-send-email-giedrius.rekasius@gmail.comSigned-off-by:
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
Nicolas Pitre authored
It is better not to think about compute capacity as being equivalent to "CPU power". The upcoming "power aware" scheduler work may create confusion with the notion of energy consumption if "power" is used too liberally. Let's rename the following feature flags since they do relate to capacity: SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER -> SD_SHARE_CPUCAPACITY ARCH_POWER -> ARCH_CAPACITY NONTASK_POWER -> NONTASK_CAPACITY Signed-off-by:
Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Nicolas Pitre authored
It is better not to think about compute capacity as being equivalent to "CPU power". The upcoming "power aware" scheduler work may create confusion with the notion of energy consumption if "power" is used too liberally. This contains the architecture visible changes. Incidentally, only ARM takes advantage of the available pow^H^H^Hcapacity scaling hooks and therefore those changes outside kernel/sched/ are confined to one ARM specific file. The default arch_scale_smt_power() hook is not overridden by anyone. Replacements are as follows: arch_scale_freq_power --> arch_scale_freq_capacity arch_scale_smt_power --> arch_scale_smt_capacity SCHED_POWER_SCALE --> SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE SCHED_POWER_SHIFT --> SCHED_CAPACITY_SHIFT The local usage of "power" in arch/arm/kernel/topology.c is also changed to "capacity" as appropriate. Signed-off-by:
-
Nicolas Pitre authored
It is better not to think about compute capacity as being equivalent to "CPU power". The upcoming "power aware" scheduler work may create confusion with the notion of energy consumption if "power" is used too liberally. This is the remaining "power" -> "capacity" rename for local symbols. Those symbols visible to the rest of the kernel are not included yet. Signed-off-by:
-
Nicolas Pitre authored
It is better not to think about compute capacity as being equivalent to "CPU power". The upcoming "power aware" scheduler work may create confusion with the notion of energy consumption if "power" is used too liberally. Since struct sched_group_power is really about compute capacity of sched groups, let's rename it to struct sched_group_capacity. Similarly sgp becomes sgc. Related variables and functions dealing with groups are also adjusted accordingly. Signed-off-by:
-
Nicolas Pitre authored
We have "power" (which should actually become "capacity") and "capacity" which is a scaled down "capacity factor" in terms of unitary tasks. Let's use "capacity_factor" to make room for proper usage of "capacity" later. Signed-off-by:
-
Nicolas Pitre authored
The capacity of a CPU/group should be some intrinsic value that doesn't change with task placement. It is like a container which capacity is stable regardless of the amount of liquid in it (its "utilization")... unless the container itself is crushed that is, but that's another story. Therefore let's rename "has_capacity" to "has_free_capacity" in order to better convey the wanted meaning. Signed-off-by:
-
Nicolas Pitre authored
It is better not to think about compute capacity as being equivalent to "CPU power". The upcoming "power aware" scheduler work may create confusion with the notion of energy consumption if "power" is used too liberally. To make things explicit and not create more confusion with the existing "capacity" member, let's rename things as follows: power -> compute_capacity capacity -> task_capacity Note: none of those fields are actually used outside update_numa_stats(). Signed-off-by:
-
Dan Carpenter authored
yield_to() is supposed to return -ESRCH if there is no task to yield to, but because the type is bool that is the same as returning true. The only place I see which cares is kvm_vcpu_on_spin(). Signed-off-by:
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Reviewed-by:
Raghavendra <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Manuel Schölling authored
To be future-proof and for better readability the time comparisons are modified to use time_after() instead of plain, error-prone math. Signed-off-by:
Manuel Schölling <manuel.schoelling@gmx.de> Signed-off-by:
-
Tim Chen authored
The current no_hz idle load balancer do load balancing for *all* idle cpus, even though the time due to load balance for a particular idle cpu could be still a while in the future. This introduces a much higher load balancing rate than what is necessary. The patch changes the behavior by only doing idle load balancing on behalf of an idle cpu only when it is due for load balancing. On SGI's systems with over 3000 cores, the cpu responsible for idle balancing got overwhelmed with idle balancing, and introduces a lot of OS noise to workloads. This patch fixes the issue. Signed-off-by:
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Acked-by:
Russ Anderson <rja@sgi.com> Reviewed-by:
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Reviewed-by:
Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Ben Segall authored
sched_cfs_period_timer() reads cfs_b->period without locks before calling do_sched_cfs_period_timer(), and similarly unthrottle_offline_cfs_rqs() would read cfs_b->period without the right lock. Thus a simultaneous change of bandwidth could cause corruption on any platform where ktime_t or u64 writes/reads are not atomic. Extend cfs_b->lock from do_sched_cfs_period_timer() to include the read of cfs_b->period to solve that issue; unthrottle_offline_cfs_rqs() can just use 1 rather than the exact quota, much like distribute_cfs_runtime() does. There is also an unlocked read of cfs_b->runtime_expires, but a race there would only delay runtime expiry by a tick. Still, the comparison should just be != anyway, which clarifies even that problem. Signed-off-by:
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com> Tested-by:
Roman Gushchin <klamm@yandex-team.ru> [peterz: Fix compile warn] Signed-off-by:
-
- 22 May, 2014 27 commits
-
-
Rik van Riel authored
Affine wakeups have the potential to interfere with NUMA placement. If a task wakes up too many other tasks, affine wakeups will get disabled. However, regardless of how many other tasks it wakes up, it gets re-enabled once a second, potentially interfering with NUMA placement of other tasks. By decaying wakee_wakes in half instead of zeroing it, we can avoid that problem for some workloads. Signed-off-by:
-
Rik van Riel authored
Update the migrate_improves/degrades_locality() functions with knowledge of pseudo-interleaving. Do not consider moving tasks around within the set of group's active nodes as improving or degrading locality. Instead, leave the load balancer free to balance the load between a numa_group's active nodes. Also, switch from the group/task_weight functions to the group/task_fault functions. The "weight" functions involve a division, but both calls use the same divisor, so there's no point in doing that from these functions. On a 4 node (x10 core) system, performance of SPECjbb2005 seems unaffected, though the number of migrations with 2 8-warehouse wide instances seems to have almost halved, due to the scheduler running each instance on a single node. Signed-off-by:
-
Rik van Riel authored
Currently the NUMA balancing code only allows moving tasks between NUMA nodes when the load on both nodes is in balance. This breaks down when the load was imbalanced to begin with. Allow tasks to be moved between NUMA nodes if the imbalance is small, or if the new imbalance is be smaller than the original one. Suggested-by:
-
xiaofeng.yan authored
sched/rt: Fix 'struct sched_dl_entity' and dl_task_time() comments, to match the current upstream code Signed-off-by:
xiaofeng.yan <xiaofeng.yan@huawei.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Dongsheng Yang authored
sched: Consolidate open coded implementations of nice level frobbing into nice_to_rlimit() and rlimit_to_nice() Signed-off-by:
Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Corey Minyard authored
If the sched_clock time starts at a large value, the kernel will spin in sched_avg_update for a long time while rq->age_stamp catches up with rq->clock. The comment in kernel/sched/clock.c says that there is no strict promise that it starts at zero. So initialize rq->age_stamp when a cpu starts up to avoid this. I was seeing long delays on a simulator that didn't start the clock at zero. This might also be an issue on reboots on processors that don't re-initialize the timer to zero on reset, and when using kexec. Signed-off-by:
Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Kirill Tkhai authored
Sometimes ->nr_running may cross 2 but interrupt is not being sent to rq's cpu. In this case we don't reenable the timer. Looks like this may be the reason for rare unexpected effects, if nohz is enabled. Patch replaces all places of direct changing of nr_running and makes add_nr_running() caring about crossing border. Signed-off-by:
Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@yandex.ru> Acked-by:
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Jason Low authored
Currently, in idle_balance(), we update rq->next_balance when we pull_tasks. However, it is also important to update this in the !pulled_tasks case too. When the CPU is "busy" (the CPU isn't idle), rq->next_balance gets computed using sd->busy_factor (so we increase the balance interval when the CPU is busy). However, when the CPU goes idle, rq->next_balance could still be set to a large value that was computed with the sd->busy_factor. Thus, we need to also update rq->next_balance in idle_balance() in the cases where !pulled_tasks too, so that rq->next_balance gets updated without taking the busy_factor into account when the CPU is about to go idle. This patch makes rq->next_balance get updated independently of whether or not we pulled_task. Also, we add logic to ensure that we always traverse at least 1 of the sched domains to get a proper next_balance value for updating rq->next_balance. Additionally, since load_balance() modifies the sd->balance_interval, we need to re-obtain the sched domain's interval after the call to load_balance() in rebalance_domains() before we update rq->next_balance. This patch adds and uses 2 new helper functions, update_next_balance() and get_sd_balance_interval() to update next_balance and obtain the sched domain's balance_interval. Signed-off-by:
Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Dongsheng Yang authored
Suggested-by:
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Dietmar Eggemann authored
There is no need to zero struct sched_group member cpumask and struct sched_group_power member power since both structures are already allocated as zeroed memory in __sdt_alloc(). This patch has been tested with BUG_ON(!cpumask_empty(sched_group_cpus(sg))); and BUG_ON(sg->sgp->power); in build_sched_groups() on ARM TC2 and INTEL i5 M520 platform including CPU hotplug scenarios. Signed-off-by:
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Vincent Guittot authored
Jet Chen has reported a kernel panics when booting qemu-system-x86_64 with kvm64 cpu. A panic occured while building the sched_domain. In sched_init_numa, we create a new topology table in which both default levels and numa levels are copied. The last row of the table must have a null pointer in the mask field. The current implementation doesn't add this last row in the computation of the table size. So we add 1 row in the allocation size that will be used as the last row of the table. The kzalloc will ensure that the mask field is NULL. Reported-by:
Jet Chen <jet.chen@intel.com> Tested-by:
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Rik van Riel authored
On smaller systems, the top level sched domain will be an affine domain, and select_idle_sibling is invoked for every SD_WAKE_AFFINE wakeup. This seems to be working well. On larger systems, with the node distance between far away NUMA nodes being > RECLAIM_DISTANCE, select_idle_sibling is only called if the waker and the wakee are on nodes less than RECLAIM_DISTANCE apart. This patch leaves in place the policy of not pulling the task across nodes on such systems, while fixing the issue that select_idle_sibling is not called at all in certain circumstances. The code will look for an idle CPU in the same CPU package as the CPU where the task ran previously. Signed-off-by:
-
Michael Kerrisk authored
Gotos are chained pointlessly here, and the 'out' label can be dispensed with. Signed-off-by:
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Michael Kerrisk authored
The logic in this function is a little contorted, clean it up: * Rather than having chained gotos for the -EFBIG case, just return -EFBIG directly. * Now, the label 'out' is no longer needed, and 'ret' must be zero zero by the time we fall through to this point, so just return 0. Signed-off-by: -
Ben Segall authored
task_hot checks exec_start on any runnable task, but if it has been migrated since the it last ran, then exec_start is a clock_task from another cpu. If the old cpu's clock_task was sufficiently far ahead of this cpu's then the task will not be considered for another migration until it has run. Instead reset exec_start whenever a task is migrated, since it is presumably no longer hot anyway. Signed-off-by:
-
Ingo Molnar authored
Signed-off-by: -
Ingo Molnar authored
Merge branch 'pm-cpuidle' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm into sched/core Pull scheduling related CPU idle updates from Rafael J. Wysocki. Conflicts: kernel/sched/idle.c Signed-off-by:
-
Ingo Molnar authored
Signed-off-by: -
Peter Zijlstra authored
The only idle method for arm64 is WFI and it therefore unconditionally requires the reschedule interrupt when idle. Suggested-by:
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by:
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by:
-
James Hogan authored
The Meta idle function jumps into the interrupt handler which efficiently blocks waiting for the next interrupt when it reads the interrupt status register (TXSTATI). No other (polling) idle functions can be used, therefore TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG is unnecessary, so lets remove it. Peter Zijlstra said: > Most archs have (x86) hlt or (arm) wfi like idle instructions, and if > that is your only possible idle function, you'll require the interrupt > to wake up and there's really no point to having the POLLING bit. Signed-off-by:
James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Lai Jiangshan authored
Lai found that: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 13 at arch/x86/kernel/smp.c:124 native_smp_send_reschedule+0x2d/0x4b() ... migration_cpu_stop+0x1d/0x22 was caused by set_cpus_allowed_ptr() assuming that cpu_active_mask is always a sub-set of cpu_online_mask. This isn't true since 5fbd036b ("sched: Cleanup cpu_active madness"). So set active and online at the same time to avoid this particular problem. Fixes: 5fbd036b ("sched: Cleanup cpu_active madness") Signed-off-by:
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Peter Zijlstra authored
Tejun reported that his resume was failing due to order-3 allocations from sched_domain building. Replace the NR_CPUS arrays in there with a dynamically allocated array. Reported-by:
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Peter Zijlstra authored
Tejun reported that his resume was failing due to order-3 allocations from sched_domain building. Replace the NR_CPUS arrays in there with a dynamically allocated array. Reported-by:
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@gmail.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-kat4gl1m5a6dwy6nzuqox45e@git.kernel.orgSigned-off-by:
-
Juri Lelli authored
Michael Kerrisk noticed that creating SCHED_DEADLINE reservations with certain parameters (e.g, a runtime of something near 2^64 ns) can cause a system freeze for some amount of time. The problem is that in the interface we have u64 sched_runtime; while internally we need to have a signed runtime (to cope with budget overruns) s64 runtime; At the time we setup a new dl_entity we copy the first value in the second. The cast turns out with negative values when sched_runtime is too big, and this causes the scheduler to go crazy right from the start. Moreover, considering how we deal with deadlines wraparound (s64)(a - b) < 0 we also have to restrict acceptable values for sched_{deadline,period}. This patch fixes the thing checking that user parameters are always below 2^63 ns (still large enough for everyone). It also rewrites other conditions that we check, since in __checkparam_dl we don't have to deal with deadline wraparounds and what we have now erroneously fails when the difference between values is too big. Reported-by: -
Peter Zijlstra authored
The way we read POSIX one should only call sched_getparam() when sched_getscheduler() returns either SCHED_FIFO or SCHED_RR. Given that we currently return sched_param::sched_priority=0 for all others, extend the same behaviour to SCHED_DEADLINE. Requested-by:
-
Peter Zijlstra authored
The scheduler uses policy=-1 to preserve the current policy state to implement sys_sched_setparam(), this got exposed to userspace by accident through sys_sched_setattr(), cure this. Reported-by:
-
Michael Kerrisk authored
The documented[1] behavior of sched_attr() in the proposed man page text is: sched_attr::size must be set to the size of the structure, as in sizeof(struct sched_attr), if the provided structure is smaller than the kernel structure, any additional fields are assumed '0'. If the provided structure is larger than the kernel structure, the kernel verifies all additional fields are '0' if not the syscall will fail with -E2BIG. As currently implemented, sched_copy_attr() returns -EFBIG for for this case, but the logic in sys_sched_setattr() converts that error to -EFAULT. This patch fixes the behavior. [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1615615/focus=1697760Signed-off-by:
-
- 21 May, 2014 1 commit
-
-
Linus Torvalds authored
-
