now that no UDC driver relies on the extra
'driver' argument to ->udc_stop(), we can
safely remove it.

This commit is based on previous work by
Robert Baldyga <r.baldyga@samsung.com> which
can be found at [1]; however that patch turned
out to have a high probability of regressing
many UDC drivers because of a blind search & replace
s/driver/$udc->driver/ which caused the 'driver'
argument to stop_activity() to be a valid non-NULL
pointer when it should be NULL, thus causing UDCs
to mistakenly call gadget driver's ->disconnect()
callback.

[1] http://markmail.org/message/x5zneg4xea4zntabAcked-by: Peter Chen <peter.chen@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

Currently, we're printing gadget driver name when
registering and UDC name when unregistering. Standardize
on always printing gadget driver name.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

now that we provide generic register/unregister
debugging messages from udc-core, we can remove
the same messages from this driver.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

now that we provide generic register/unregister
debugging messages from udc-core, we can remove
the same messages from this driver.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

now that we provide generic register/unregister
debugging messages from udc-core, we can remove
the same messages from this driver.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

now that we provide generic register/unregister
debugging messages from udc-core, we can remove
the same messages from this driver.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

now that we provide generic register/unregister
debugging messages from udc-core, we can remove
the same messages from this driver.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

now that we provide generic register/unregister
debugging messages from udc-core, we can remove
the same messages from this driver.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

now that we provide generic register/unregister
debugging messages from udc-core, we can remove
the same messages from this driver.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

now that we provide generic register/unregister
debugging messages from udc-core, we can remove
the same messages from this driver.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

now that we provide generic register/unregister
debugging messages from udc-core, we can remove
the same messages from this driver.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

We know that our udc points to our gadget and our
gadget_driver, simplify the interface by passing
a single argument.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

future patches will remove the extra 'driver'
argument to ->udc_stop(), in order to do that,
we must make sure that our UDC does not rely
on it first.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

future patches will remove the extra 'driver'
argument to ->udc_stop(), in order to do that,
we must make sure that our UDC does not rely
on it first.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

future patches will remove the extra 'driver'
argument to ->udc_stop(), in order to do that,
we must make sure that our UDC does not rely
on it first.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

future patches will remove the extra 'driver'
argument to ->udc_stop(), in order to do that,
we must make sure that our UDC does not rely
on it first.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

future patches will remove the extra 'driver'
argument to ->udc_stop(), in order to do that,
we must make sure that our UDC does not rely
on it first.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

future patches will remove the extra 'driver'
argument to ->udc_stop(), in order to do that,
we must make sure that our UDC does not rely
on it first.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

future patches will remove the extra 'driver'
argument to ->udc_stop(), in order to do that,
we must make sure that our UDC does not rely
on it first.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

future patches will remove the extra 'driver'
argument to ->udc_stop(), in order to do that,
we must make sure that our UDC does not rely
on it first.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

future patches will remove the extra 'driver'
argument to ->udc_stop(), in order to do that,
we must make sure that our UDC does not rely
on it first.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

future patches will remove the extra 'driver'
argument to ->udc_stop(), in order to do that,
we must make sure that our UDC does not rely
on it first.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

future patches will remove the extra 'driver'
argument to ->udc_stop(), in order to do that,
we must make sure that our UDC does not rely
on it first.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

future patches will remove the extra 'driver'
argument to ->udc_stop(), in order to do that,
we must make sure that our UDC does not rely
on it first.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

future patches will remove the extra 'driver'
argument to ->udc_stop(), in order to do that,
we must make sure that our UDC does not rely
on it first.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

The drivers should use dmaengine_terminate_all() or dmaengine_slave_config()
API instead of accessing the device_control which will be deprecated soon
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

The memory subsystem has already had similar message for it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Chen <peter.chen@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

The memory subsystem has already had similar message for it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Chen <peter.chen@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

The memory subsystem has already had similar message for it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Chen <peter.chen@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

The memory subsystem has already had similar message for it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Chen <peter.chen@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

The memory subsystem has already had similar message for it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Chen <peter.chen@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

The memory subsystem has already had similar message for it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Chen <peter.chen@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

The memory subsystem has already had similar message for it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Chen <peter.chen@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

The memory subsystem has already had similar message for it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Chen <peter.chen@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

The memory subsystem has already had similar message for it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Chen <peter.chen@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

The memory subsystem has already had similar message for it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Chen <peter.chen@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

The memory subsystem has already had similar message for it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Chen <peter.chen@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

The memory subsystem has already had similar message for it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Chen <peter.chen@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

The memory subsystem has already had similar message for it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Chen <peter.chen@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>

The memory subsystem has already had similar message for it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Chen <peter.chen@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>