Skip to content

L
linux
Switch branch/tag
  1. 17 Jun, 2017 34 commits
  3. 14 Jun, 2017 6 commits
    • Greg Kroah-Hartman's avatar
      Linux 4.4.72 · 30c9187f
      Greg Kroah-Hartman authored
      30c9187f
    • Mark Rutland's avatar
      arm64: ensure extension of smp_store_release value · 4e528eb9
      Mark Rutland authored 
      commit 994870be upstream.

When an inline assembly operand's type is narrower than the register it
is allocated to, the least significant bits of the register (up to the
operand type's width) are valid, and any other bits are permitted to
contain any arbitrary value. This aligns with the AAPCS64 parameter
passing rules.

Our __smp_store_release() implementation does not account for this, and
implicitly assumes that operands have been zero-extended to the width of
the type being stored to. Thus, we may store unknown values to memory
when the value type is narrower than the pointer type (e.g. when storing
a char to a long).

This patch fixes the issue by casting the value operand to the same
width as the pointer operand in all cases, which ensures that the value
is zero-extended as we expect. We use the same union trickery as
__smp_load_acquire and {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() to avoid GCC complaining that
pointers are potentially cast to narrower width integers in unreachable
paths.

A whitespace issue at the top of __smp_store_release() is also
corrected.

No changes are necessary for __smp_load_acquire(). Load instructions
implicitly clear any upper bits of the register, and the compiler will
only consider the least significant bits of the register as valid
regardless.

Fixes: 47933ad4 ("arch: Introduce smp_load_acquire(), smp_store_release()")
Fixes: 878a84d5 ("arm64: add missing data types in smp_load_acquire/smp_store_release")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.14.x-
Acked-by: default avatarWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      4e528eb9
    • Mark Rutland's avatar
      arm64: armv8_deprecated: ensure extension of addr · 01ce16f4
      Mark Rutland authored 
      commit 55de49f9 upstream.

Our compat swp emulation holds the compat user address in an unsigned
int, which it passes to __user_swpX_asm(). When a 32-bit value is passed
in a register, the upper 32 bits of the register are unknown, and we
must extend the value to 64 bits before we can use it as a base address.

This patch casts the address to unsigned long to ensure it has been
suitably extended, avoiding the potential issue, and silencing a related
warning from clang.

Fixes: bd35a4ad ("arm64: Port SWP/SWPB emulation support from arm")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.19.x-
Acked-by: default avatarWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      01ce16f4
    • Kees Cook's avatar
      usercopy: Adjust tests to deal with SMAP/PAN · 51ff10e7
      Kees Cook authored 
      commit f5f893c5 upstream.

Under SMAP/PAN/etc, we cannot write directly to userspace memory, so
this rearranges the test bytes to get written through copy_to_user().
Additionally drops the bad copy_from_user() test that would trigger a
memcpy() against userspace on failure.

[arnd: the test module was added in 3.14, and this backported patch
       should apply cleanly on all version from 3.14 to 4.10.
       The original patch was in 4.11 on top of a context change
       I saw the bug triggered with kselftest on a 4.4.y stable kernel]
Signed-off-by: default avatarKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      51ff10e7
    • Mike Marciniszyn's avatar
      RDMA/qib,hfi1: Fix MR reference count leak on write with immediate · 746d4893
      Mike Marciniszyn authored 
      commit 1feb4006 upstream.

The handling of IB_RDMA_WRITE_ONLY_WITH_IMMEDIATE will leak a memory
reference when a buffer cannot be allocated for returning the immediate
data.

The issue is that the rkey validation has already occurred and the RNR
nak fails to release the reference that was fruitlessly gotten.  The
the peer will send the identical single packet request when its RNR
timer pops.

The fix is to release the held reference prior to the rnr nak exit.
This is the only sequence the requires both rkey validation and the
buffer allocation on the same packet.

Cc: Stable <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.7+
Tested-by: default avatarTadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDoug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      746d4893
    • Kristina Martsenko's avatar
      arm64: entry: improve data abort handling of tagged pointers · 3ccf6956
      Kristina Martsenko authored 
      commit 276e9327 upstream.

This backport has a minor difference from the upstream commit: it adds
the asm-uaccess.h file, which is not present in 4.4, because 4.4 does
not have commit b4b8664d ("arm64: don't pull uaccess.h into *.S").

Original patch description:

When handling a data abort from EL0, we currently zero the top byte of
the faulting address, as we assume the address is a TTBR0 address, which
may contain a non-zero address tag. However, the address may be a TTBR1
address, in which case we should not zero the top byte. This patch fixes
that. The effect is that the full TTBR1 address is passed to the task's
signal handler (or printed out in the kernel log).

When handling a data abort from EL1, we leave the faulting address
intact, as we assume it's either a TTBR1 address or a TTBR0 address with
tag 0x00. This is true as far as I'm aware, we don't seem to access a
tagged TTBR0 address anywhere in the kernel. Regardless, it's easy to
forget about address tags, and code added in the future may not always
remember to remove tags from addresses before accessing them. So add tag
handling to the EL1 data abort handler as well. This also makes it
consistent with the EL0 data abort handler.

Fixes: d50240a5 ("arm64: mm: permit use of tagged pointers at EL0")
Reviewed-by: default avatarDave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Acked-by: default avatarWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarKristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      3ccf6956
GitLab Nexedi Edition | About GitLab | About Nexedi | 沪ICP备2021021310号-2 | 沪ICP备2021021310号-7