As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.

Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.

This code was also double-inverting a bool which makes no sense
so I removed that code and moved clamping toward the end.

Cc: Björn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.

Also, this code was double-inverting a bool. That makes no
sense whatsoever, so I removed the double-invert.

Cc: Björn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.

Cc: Björn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com>
Cc: Ivan T. Ivanov <ivan.ivanov@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.

Cc: Ivan T. Ivanov <ivan.ivanov@linaro.org>
Cc: Björn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.

Cc: Pramod Gurav <pramod.gurav@smartplayin.com>
Cc: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.
Acked-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.

Cc: Lars Poeschel <poeschel@lemonage.de>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.
Acked-by: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.
Acked-by: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.

This also makes the driver start to return the error code, as the
end of the series make this work.

Cc: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.

This also starts to propagate the error code from the I2C
transaction as the end of the series adds support for that.

Cc: Wei Chen <Wei.Chen@csr.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.

Cc: Alessandro Rubini <rubini@gnudd.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.

Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>
Cc: Kristoffer Ericson <kristoffer.ericson@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.

Cc: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Cc: Daniel Krueger <daniel.krueger@systec-electronic.com>
Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.

Also start returning the error code if something fails, as the
end of the series augment the core to support this.

Cc: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Cc: George Cherian <george.cherian@ti.com>
Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.
Acked-by: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.

Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.

Cc: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
Cc: Tomoya MORINAGA <tomoya-linux@dsn.okisemi.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.

Also start to propagate the error code here as the end of the
series fixes this to work for all drivers.

Cc: Semen Protsenko <semen.protsenko@globallogic.com>
Reviewed-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.

Cc: Roland Stigge <stigge@antcom.de>
Cc: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.

Cc: Brunner Michael <Michael.Brunner@kontron.com>
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.

Cc: Ira W. Snyder <iws@ovro.caltech.edu>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.
Acked-by: David Cohen <david.a.cohen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.

Cc: Magnus Damm <damm@opensource.se>
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.

Cc: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

As we want gpio_chip .get() calls to be able to return negative
error codes and propagate to drivers, we need to go over all
drivers and make sure their return values are clamped to [0,1].
We do this by using the ret = !!(val) design pattern.

Cc: Ashish Jangam <ashish.jangam@kpitcummins.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Performing a read operation on the IRQ Status register will clear the
IRQ latch. Since a read operation on the IRQ Status register must be
performed in the IRQ handler in order to determine if the IRQ was in
fact generated by the device, the IRQ latch is consequently cleared by
the IRQ handler. A spinlock is used to guarantee that each IRQ is
serviced in the order it was received.
Signed-off-by: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

The commit "gpio: pxa: change the interrupt management" should have
taken care of moving an ifdef to not englobe irqdomain related
structures anymore, as they are used now for all builds.

This repairs the broken builds where CONFIG_OF=n.
Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

This removes the set_irq_flags() call that unfortunately slipped
into the BCM NSP driver.
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Yendapally Reddy Dhananjaya Reddy <yrdreddy@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Linux 4.4-rc6

Pull RTC fixes from Alexandre Belloni:
 "Late fixes for the RTC subsystem for 4.4:

  A fix for a nasty hardware bug in rk808 and an initialization
  reordering in da9063 to fix a possible crash"

* tag 'rtc-4.4-3' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/abelloni/linux:
  rtc: da9063: fix access ordering error during RTC interrupt at system power on
  rtc: rk808: Compensate for Rockchip calendar deviation on November 31st

This fix alters the ordering of the IRQ and device registrations in the RTC
driver probe function. This change will apply to the RTC driver that supports
both DA9063 and DA9062 PMICs.

A problem could occur with the existing RTC driver if:

A system is started from a cold boot using the PMIC RTC IRQ to initiate a
power on operation. For instance, if an RTC alarm is used to start a
platform from power off.
The existing driver IRQ is requested before the device has been properly
registered.
i.e.
    ret = devm_request_threaded_irq()
comes before
    rtc->rtc_dev = devm_rtc_device_register();

In this case, the interrupt can be called before the device has been
registered and the handler can be called immediately. The IRQ handler
da9063_alarm_event() contains the function call

    rtc_update_irq(rtc->rtc_dev, 1, RTC_IRQF | RTC_AF);

which in turn tries to access the unavailable rtc->rtc_dev.

The fix is to reorder the functions inside the RTC probe. The IRQ is
requested after the RTC device resource has been registered so that
get_irq_byname is the last thing to happen.
Signed-off-by: Steve Twiss <stwiss.opensource@diasemi.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>

In A.D. 1582 Pope Gregory XIII found that the existing Julian calendar
insufficiently represented reality, and changed the rules about
calculating leap years to account for this. Similarly, in A.D. 2013
Rockchip hardware engineers found that the new Gregorian calendar still
contained flaws, and that the month of November should be counted up to
31 days instead. Unfortunately it takes a long time for calendar changes
to gain widespread adoption, and just like more than 300 years went by
before the last Protestant nation implemented Greg's proposal, we will
have to wait a while until all religions and operating system kernels
acknowledge the inherent advantages of the Rockchip system. Until then
we need to translate dates read from (and written to) Rockchip hardware
back to the Gregorian format.

This patch works by defining Jan 1st, 2016 as the arbitrary anchor date
on which Rockchip and Gregorian calendars are in sync. From that we can
translate arbitrary later dates back and forth by counting the number
of November/December transitons since the anchor date to determine the
offset between the calendars. We choose this method (rather than trying
to regularly "correct" the date stored in hardware) since it's the only
way to ensure perfect time-keeping even if the system may be shut down
for an unknown number of years. The drawback is that other software
reading the same hardware (e.g. mainboard firmware) must use the same
translation convention (including the same anchor date) to be able to
read and write correct timestamps from/to the RTC.
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>