1. 13 Jan, 2014 7 commits
  2. 11 Jan, 2014 2 commits
  3. 08 Jan, 2014 27 commits
  4. 07 Jan, 2014 2 commits
    • Alan Stern's avatar
      USB: fix race between hub_disconnect and recursively_mark_NOTATTACHED · 543d7784
      Alan Stern authored
      There is a race in the hub driver between hub_disconnect() and
      recursively_mark_NOTATTACHED().  This race can be triggered if the
      driver is unbound from a device at the same time as the bus's root hub
      is removed.  When the race occurs, it can cause an oops:
      
      BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000015c
      IP: [<c16d5fb0>] recursively_mark_NOTATTACHED+0x20/0x60
      Call Trace:
       [<c16d5fc4>] recursively_mark_NOTATTACHED+0x34/0x60
       [<c16d5fc4>] recursively_mark_NOTATTACHED+0x34/0x60
       [<c16d5fc4>] recursively_mark_NOTATTACHED+0x34/0x60
       [<c16d5fc4>] recursively_mark_NOTATTACHED+0x34/0x60
       [<c16d6082>] usb_set_device_state+0x92/0x120
       [<c16d862b>] usb_disconnect+0x2b/0x1a0
       [<c16dd4c0>] usb_remove_hcd+0xb0/0x160
       [<c19ca846>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x26/0x50
       [<c1704efc>] ehci_mid_remove+0x1c/0x30
       [<c1704f26>] ehci_mid_stop_host+0x16/0x30
       [<c16f7698>] penwell_otg_work+0xd28/0x3520
       [<c19c945b>] ? __schedule+0x39b/0x7f0
       [<c19cdb9d>] ? sub_preempt_count+0x3d/0x50
       [<c125e97d>] process_one_work+0x11d/0x3d0
       [<c19c7f4d>] ? mutex_unlock+0xd/0x10
       [<c125e0e5>] ? manage_workers.isra.24+0x1b5/0x270
       [<c125f009>] worker_thread+0xf9/0x320
       [<c19ca846>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x26/0x50
       [<c125ef10>] ? rescuer_thread+0x2b0/0x2b0
       [<c1264ac4>] kthread+0x94/0xa0
       [<c19d0f77>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x1b/0x28
       [<c1264a30>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0xc0/0xc0
      
      One problem is that recursively_mark_NOTATTACHED() uses the intfdata
      value and hub->hdev->maxchild while hub_disconnect() is clearing them.
      Another problem is that it uses hub->ports[i] while the port device is
      being released.
      
      To fix this race, we need to hold the device_state_lock while
      hub_disconnect() changes the values.  (Note that usb_disconnect()
      and hub_port_connect_change() already acquire this lock at similar
      critical times during a USB device's life cycle.)  We also need to
      remove the port devices after maxchild has been set to 0, instead of
      before.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAlan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
      Reported-by: default avatar"Du, Changbin" <changbinx.du@intel.com>
      Tested-by: default avatar"Du, Changbin" <changbinx.du@intel.com>
      CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      543d7784
    • Arnd Bergmann's avatar
      USB: fix: ohci-at91 mismerge build error · 1f53b485
      Arnd Bergmann authored
      After commit 99f14bd4 "Merge 3.13-rc5 into usb-next" (in linux-next as of
      today), I'm getting this error building any at91 kernel:
      
      drivers/usb/host/ohci-at91.c: In function 'usb_hcd_at91_probe':
      drivers/usb/host/ohci-at91.c:190:4: error: label 'err' used but not defined
          goto err;
          ^
      drivers/usb/host/ohci-at91.c: At top level:
      drivers/usb/host/ohci-at91.c:206:2: warning: data definition has no type or storage class [enabled by default]
        at91_stop_hc(pdev);
        ^
      ...
      
      The problem is obviously a mismerge between two unrelated changes that
      resulted in missing opening braces.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
      Acked-by: default avatarBoris BREZILLON <b.brezillon@overkiz.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      1f53b485
  5. 03 Jan, 2014 2 commits