- 31 May, 2012 8 commits
-
-
Cong Wang authored
file_remove_suid() is a generic function operates on struct file, it almost has no relations with file mapping, so move it to fs/inode.c. Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Artem Bityutskiy authored
Currently JFFS2 file-system maps the VFS "superblock" abstraction to the write-buffer. Namely, it uses VFS services to synchronize the write-buffer periodically. The whole "superblock write-out" VFS infrastructure is served by the 'sync_supers()' kernel thread, which wakes up every 5 (by default) seconds and writes out all dirty superblock using the '->write_super()' call-back. But the problem with this thread is that it wastes power by waking up the system every 5 seconds no matter what. So we want to kill it completely and thus, we need to make file-systems to stop using the '->write_super' VFS service, and then remove it together with the kernel thread. This patch switches the JFFS2 write-buffer management from '->write_super()'/'->s_dirt' to a delayed work. Instead of setting the 's_dirt' flag we just schedule a delayed work for synchronizing the write-buffer. Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Artem Bityutskiy authored
We do not need to call 'jffs2_write_super()' on sync. This function causes a GC pass to make sure the current contents is pushed out with the data which we already have on the media. But this is not needed on unmount and only slows sync down unnecessarily. It is enough to just sync the write-buffer. This call was added by one of the generic VFS rework patch-sets, see d579ed00. Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Artem Bityutskiy authored
We do not need to call 'jffs2_write_super()' on unmount. This function causes a GC pass to make sure the current contents is pushed out with the data which we already have on the media. But this is not needed on unmount and only slows unmount down unnecessarily. It is enough to just sync the write-buffer. This call was added by one of the generic VFS rework patch-sets, see 8c85e125. Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Artem Bityutskiy authored
We do not need 'lock_super()'/'unlock_super()' in JFFS2 - kill them. Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 30 May, 2012 32 commits
-
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Andi Kleen authored
lglocks and brlocks are currently generated with some complicated macros in lglock.h. But there's no reason to not just use common utility functions and put all the data into a common data structure. In preparation, this patch changes the API to look more like normal function calls with pointers, not magic macros. The patch is rather large because I move over all users in one go to keep it bisectable. This impacts the VFS somewhat in terms of lines changed. But no actual behaviour change. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: checkpatch fixes] Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Andi Kleen authored
lglocks and brlocks are currently generated with some complicated macros in lglock.h. But there's no reason to not just use common utility functions and put all the data into a common data structure. Since there are at least two users it makes sense to share this code in a library. This is also easier maintainable than a macro forest. This will also make it later possible to dynamically allocate lglocks and also use them in modules (this would both still need some additional, but now straightforward, code) [akpm@linux-foundation.org: checkpatch fixes] Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Rusty Russell authored
Optimizing the slow paths adds a lot of complexity. If you need to grab every lock often, you have other problems. Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Acked-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
seeing that "fast" symlinks still get allocation + copy, we might as well simply switch them to pagecache-based variant of ->follow_link(); just need an appropriate ->readpage() for them... Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
switch to generic_readlink(), while we are at it Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
little-endians... Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
annotate properly... Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Randy Dunlap authored
Fix kernel-doc warnings in fs/inode.c: Warning(fs/inode.c:1493): No description found for parameter 'path' Warning(fs/inode.c:1493): Excess function parameter 'mnt' description in 'touch_atime' Warning(fs/inode.c:1493): Excess function parameter 'dentry' description in 'touch_atime' Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
a couple of le32 and le16 used with wrong le..._to_cpu(), plus idiotic use of le32_to_cpu() on 1-bit bitfield Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
ocfs2_block_check is for little-endian contents; if we just want to its fields converted to host-endian in a couple of functions, just put those values into local u32 and u16... Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
... unused since 2.4.4. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
In *all* callers we have a dentry of child of that directory. Just use ->d_parent of that one, for fsck sake... Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
a) %d does _not_ produce a page worth of output b) snprintf() doesn't return negatives - it used to in old glibc, but that's the kernel... Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Sage Weil authored
Use parent_inode has a flag for whether nfsd wants a connectable fh, but generate one opportunistically so that we can take advantage of the additional info in there. Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
pass inode + parent's inode or NULL instead of dentry + bool saying whether we want the parent or not. NOTE: that needs ceph fix folded in. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
don't open-code it... Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-