- 27 Feb, 2017 8 commits
-
-
Kinglong Mee authored
When more than one data blocks are allocated, the F2FS_MAP_UNWRITTEN/MAPPED flags will be overlapped by F2FS_MAP_NEW at the later times. Signed-off-by: Kinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Hou Pengyang authored
proc A: proc B: - writeback_sb_inodes - __writeback_single_inode - do_writepages - f2fs_write_node_pages - f2fs_balance_fs_bg - write_checkpoint - build_free_nids - flush_nat_entries - __build_free_nids - __flush_nat_entry_set - ra_meta_pages - get_next_nat_page - current_nat_addr - set_to_next_nat [do nat_bitmap checking] - f2fs_change_bit For proc A, nat_bitmap and nat_bitmap_mir would be compared without lock_op and nm_i->nat_tree_lock, while proc B is changing nat_bitmap/nat_bitmap_ver in cp. So it is normal for nat_bitmap/nat_bitmap diffrence under such scenario. This patch fix this by removing the monitoring point. [Fix: 599a09b2 f2fs: check in-memory nat version bitmap] Signed-off-by: Hou Pengyang <houpengyang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Hou Pengyang authored
To avoid such stale(fops, blk, len) info in f2fs_lookup_extent_tree_end tp dio-23095 [005] ...1 17878.856859: f2fs_lookup_extent_tree_end: dev = (259,30), ino = 856, pgofs = 0, ext_info(fofs: 3441207040, blk: 4294967232, len: 3481143808) Signed-off-by: Hou Pengyang <houpengyang@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Yunlong Song authored
Since has_not_enough_free_secs(sbi, 0, 0) must be true if has_not_enough_ free_secs(sbi, sec_freed, 0) is true, write_checkpoint is sure to execute in both conditions. Signed-off-by: Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Jaegeuk Kim authored
For converntional zones, we don't need to align discard commands to exact zone size. Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Jaegeuk Kim authored
We don't need to wait for each discard commands when unmounting the image. Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Jaegeuk Kim authored
We have a kernel thread to issue discard commands, so we can increase the number of batched discard sections. By default, now it becomes 4GB range. Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Jaegeuk Kim authored
This patch adds MAX_DISCARD_BLOCKS() to avoid issuing too much large single discard command. Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
- 24 Feb, 2017 6 commits
-
-
Jaegeuk Kim authored
This patch gives more SSR chances for node blocks. Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Jaegeuk Kim authored
Previously, if type is CURSEG_HOT_DATA, we only check CURSEG_HOT_DATA only. This patch fixes to search all the different types for SSR. Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Jaegeuk Kim authored
Let's check SSR in prior to LFS allocation. Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Yunlong Song authored
In allocate_segment_by_default(), need_SSR() already detected it's time to do SSR. So, let's try to find victims for data segments more aggressively in time. Signed-off-by: Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Hou Pengyang authored
As data segment gc may lead dnode dirty, so the greedy cost for data segment should be valid blocks * 2, that is data segment is prior to node segment. Signed-off-by: Hou Pengyang <houpengyang@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Yunlong Song authored
SIT information should be updated before segment allocation, since SSR needs latest valid block information. Current code does not update the old_blkaddr info in sit_entry, so adjust the allocate_segment to its proper location. Commit 5e443818 ("f2fs: handle dirty segments inside refresh_sit_entry") puts it into wrong location. Signed-off-by: Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
- 23 Feb, 2017 26 commits
-
-
Hou Pengyang authored
For foreground gc, greedy algorithm should be adapted, which makes this formula work well: (2 * (100 / config.overprovision + 1) + 6) But currently, we fg_gc have a prior to select bg_gc victim segments to gc first, these victims are selected by cost-benefit algorithm, we can't guarantee such segments have the small valid blocks, which may destroy the f2fs rule, on the worstest case, would consume all the free segments. This patch fix this by add a filter in check_bg_victims, if segment's has # of valid blocks over overprovision ratio, skip such segments. Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Hou Pengyang <houpengyang@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Jaegeuk Kim authored
Otherwise we can get livelock like below. [79880.428136] dbench D 0 18405 18404 0x00000000 [79880.428139] Call Trace: [79880.428142] __schedule+0x219/0x6b0 [79880.428144] schedule+0x36/0x80 [79880.428147] schedule_timeout+0x243/0x2e0 [79880.428152] ? update_sd_lb_stats+0x16b/0x5f0 [79880.428155] ? ktime_get+0x3c/0xb0 [79880.428157] io_schedule_timeout+0xa6/0x110 [79880.428161] __lock_page+0xf7/0x130 [79880.428164] ? unlock_page+0x30/0x30 [79880.428167] pagecache_get_page+0x16b/0x250 [79880.428171] grab_cache_page_write_begin+0x20/0x40 [79880.428182] f2fs_write_begin+0xa2/0xdb0 [f2fs] [79880.428192] ? f2fs_mark_inode_dirty_sync+0x16/0x30 [f2fs] [79880.428197] ? kmem_cache_free+0x79/0x200 [79880.428203] ? __mark_inode_dirty+0x17f/0x360 [79880.428206] generic_perform_write+0xbb/0x190 [79880.428213] ? file_update_time+0xa4/0xf0 [79880.428217] __generic_file_write_iter+0x19b/0x1e0 [79880.428226] f2fs_file_write_iter+0x9c/0x180 [f2fs] [79880.428231] __vfs_write+0xc5/0x140 [79880.428235] vfs_write+0xb2/0x1b0 [79880.428238] SyS_write+0x46/0xa0 [79880.428242] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1e/0xad Fixes: cae96a5c8ab6 ("f2fs: check io submission more precisely") Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Yunlei He authored
In FG_GC process, it will search victim section twice. This will cause some dirty section with less valid blocks skip garbage collection. section # 26425 : valid blocks # 3 142.037567: get_victim_by_default: victim 26425 : valid blocks # 3 142.037585: f2fs_get_victim: dev = (259,30), type = No TYPE, policy = (Foreground GC, LFS-mode, Greedy), victim = 26425 ofs_unit = 1, pre_victim_secno = 26425, prefree = 0, free = 244 142.039494: f2fs_get_victim: dev = (259,30), type = Hot DATA, policy = (Background GC, SSR-mode, Greedy), victim = 19022 ofs_unit = 1, pre_victim_secno = 26425, prefree = 0, free = 24 142.070247: new_curseg: Debug: alloc new segment 26746 142.244341: f2fs_get_victim: dev = (259,30), type = No TYPE, policy = (Foreground GC, LFS-mode, Greedy), victim = 26054 ofs_unit = 1, pre_victim_secno = 26054, prefree = 0, free = 243 142.254475: do_garbage_collect: Debug: FG_GC, seg_freed = 1 142.293131: f2fs_get_victim: dev = (259,30), type = Warm DATA, policy = (Background GC, SSR-mode, Greedy), victim = 23466 ofs_unit = 1, pre_victim_secno = -1, prefree = 0, free = 244 142.319001: f2fs_get_victim: dev = (259,30), type = Warm DATA, policy = (Background GC, SSR-mode, Greedy), victim = 23467 ofs_unit = 1, pre_victim_secno = -1, prefree = 0, free = 244 142.368879: get_victim_by_default: victim 26425 : valid blocks # 3 142.368894: f2fs_get_victim: dev = (259,30), type = No TYPE, policy = (Foreground GC, LFS-mode, Greedy), victim = 26425 ofs_unit = 1, pre_victim_secno = 26425, prefree = 0, free = 244 142.378127: f2fs_get_victim: dev = (259,30), type = Hot DATA, policy = (Background GC, SSR-mode, Greedy), victim = 19612 ofs_unit = 1, pre_victim_secno = 26425, prefree = 0, free = 24 142.416917: new_curseg: Debug: alloc new segment 26054 142.656794: f2fs_get_victim: dev = (259,30), type = No TYPE, policy = (Foreground GC, LFS-mode, Greedy), victim = 25404 ofs_unit = 1, pre_victim_secno = 25404, prefree = 0, free = 243 142.662139: do_garbage_collect: Debug: FG_GC, seg_freed = 1 142.684159: new_curseg: Debug: alloc new segment 25197 142.685059: get_victim_by_default: victim 26425 : valid blocks # 3 142.685079: f2fs_get_victim: dev = (259,30), type = No TYPE, policy = (Foreground GC, LFS-mode, Greedy), victim = 26425 ofs_unit = 1, pre_victim_secno = 26425, prefree = 0, free = 243 142.701427: f2fs_get_victim: dev = (259,30), type = No TYPE, policy = (Foreground GC, LFS-mode, Greedy), victim = 26238 ofs_unit = 1, pre_victim_secno = 26238, prefree = 0, free = 243 142.707105: do_garbage_collect: Debug: FG_GC, seg_freed = 1 142.802444: f2fs_get_victim: dev = (259,30), type = Warm DATA, policy = (Background GC, SSR-mode, Greedy), victim = 23473 ofs_unit = 1, pre_victim_secno = -1, prefree = 0, free = 244 142.804422: get_victim_by_default: victim 26425 : valid blocks # 3 142.804443: f2fs_get_victim: dev = (259,30), type = No TYPE, policy = (Foreground GC, LFS-mode, Greedy), victim = 26425 ofs_unit = 1, pre_victim_secno = 26425, prefree = 0, free = 244 142.851567: f2fs_get_victim: dev = (259,30), type = Hot DATA, policy = (Background GC, SSR-mode, Greedy), victim = 19092 ofs_unit = 1, pre_victim_secno = 26425, prefree = 0, free = 24 142.865014: new_curseg: Debug: alloc new segment 26238 143.082245: f2fs_get_victim: dev = (259,30), type = No TYPE, policy = (Foreground GC, LFS-mode, Greedy), victim = 26307 ofs_unit = 1, pre_victim_secno = 26307, prefree = 0, free = 244 143.088252: do_garbage_collect: Debug: FG_GC, seg_freed = 1 143.128307: new_curseg: Debug: alloc new segment 25404 143.181846: get_victim_by_default: victim 26425 : valid blocks # 3 143.181872: f2fs_get_victim: dev = (259,30), type = No TYPE, policy = (Foreground GC, LFS-mode, Greedy), victim = 26425 ofs_unit = 1, pre_victim_secno = 26425, prefree = 0, free = 244 Signed-off-by: Yunlei He <heyunlei@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Jaegeuk Kim authored
This patch adds min_cost of each victims. Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Jaegeuk Kim authored
It turns out a stakable filesystem like sdcardfs in AOSP can trigger multiple vfs_create() to lower filesystem. In that case, f2fs will add multiple dentries having same name which breaks filesystem consistency. Until upper layer fixes, let's work around by f2fs, which shows actually not much performance regression. Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Jaegeuk Kim authored
This patch shows actual device information in the tracepoints. Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Jaegeuk Kim authored
We have had node chains, but haven't used it so far due to stale node blocks. Now, we have crc|cp_ver in node footer and give random cp_ver at format time, we can start to use it again. Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Chao Yu authored
In android, since SElinux is enable, security policy will be appliedd for each file, it stores in inode as an xattr entry, so it will take one 4k size node block additionally for each file. Let's enable inline_xattr by default in order to save storage space. Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Chao Yu authored
This patch introduces new mount option 'noinline_xattr', so we can disable inline xattr functionality which is already set as a default mount option. Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Jaegeuk Kim authored
We've not seen this buggy case for a long time, so it's time to avoid this unnecessary get_node_info() call which reading NAT page to cache nat entry. Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Jaegeuk Kim authored
Let's avoid build_free_nids() in checkpoint path. Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Chao Yu authored
Currently, if we call fsync after updating the xattr date belongs to the file, f2fs needs to trigger checkpoint to keep xattr data consistent. But, this policy cause low performance as checkpoint will block most foreground operations and cause unneeded and unrelated IOs around checkpoint. This patch will reuse regular file recovery policy for xattr node block, so, we change to write xattr node block tagged with fsync flag to warm area instead of cold area, and during recovery, we search warm node chain for fsynced xattr block, and do the recovery. So, for below application IO pattern, performance can be improved obviously: - touch file - create/update/delete xattr entry in file - fsync file Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Bhumika Goyal authored
Declare fscrypt_operations structure as const as it is only stored in the s_cop field of a super_block structure. This field is of type const, so fscrypt_operations structure having this property can be made const too. File size before: fs/f2fs/super.o text data bss dec hex filename 54131 31355 184 85670 14ea6 fs/f2fs/super.o File size after: fs/f2fs/super.o text data bss dec hex filename 54227 31259 184 85670 14ea6 fs/f2fs/super.o Signed-off-by: Bhumika Goyal <bhumirks@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Jaegeuk Kim authored
If we mounted f2fs successfully, let's show current checkpoint version. Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Tiezhu Yang authored
There is a typo "f2f2" in f2fs.txt, this patch fixes it. Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <kernelpatch@126.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Jaegeuk Kim authored
This patch removes REQ_PREFLUSH in the nobarrier case. Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Jaegeuk Kim authored
If the cached bio has the last page's index, then we need to submit it. Otherwise, we don't need to submit it and can wait for further IO merges. Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Jaegeuk Kim authored
This patch check IO submission more precisely than previous rough check. Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Jaegeuk Kim authored
This patch introduces __write_data_page to call it by f2fs_write_cache_pages directly.. Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Jaegeuk Kim authored
We need to flush data writes before flushing last node block writes by using FUA with PREFLUSH. We don't need to guarantee precedent node writes since if those are not written, we can't reach to the last node block when scanning node block chain during roll-forward recovery. Afterwards f2fs_wait_on_page_writeback guarantees all the IO submission to disk, which builds a valid node block chain. Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Jaegeuk Kim authored
This patch just moves write_node_page and introduces an inner function. Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Jaegeuk Kim authored
This patch moves the tracepoint location for flush command. Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Jaegeuk Kim authored
This patch shows cached # of APPEND and UPDATE inode entries. Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
DongOh Shin authored
1) Nine coding style warnings below have been resolved: "Missing a blank line after declarations" 2) 435 coding style warnings below have been resolved: "function definition argument 'x' should also have an identifier name" 3) Two coding style warnings below have been resolved: "macros should not use a trailing semicolon" Signed-off-by: DongOh Shin <doscode.kr@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
DongOh Shin authored
Two coding style errors below have been resolved: "Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parentheses" And a coding style error below has been resolved: "space prohibited before that ',' (ctx:WxW)" Signed-off-by: DongOh Shin <doscode.kr@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-
Jaegeuk Kim authored
We missed two functions declared as static functions. Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-