It's unlikely to ever occur, but if there were already a lease set on
the file then we could end up getting back a different pointer on a
successful setlease attempt than the one we allocated. If that happens,
the one we allocated could leak.

In practice, I don't think this will happen due to the fact that we only
try to set up the lease once per nfs4_file, but this error handling is a
bit more correct given the current lease API.

Cc: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

lease_get_mtime is called without the i_lock held, so there's no
guarantee about the stability of the list. Between the time when we
assign "flock" and then dereference it to check whether it's a lease
and for write, the lease could be freed.

Ensure that that doesn't occur by taking the i_lock before trying
to check the lease.

Cc: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

security_file_set_fowner always returns 0, so make it f_setown and
__f_setown void return functions and fix up the error handling in the
callers.

Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

GFS2 and NFS have setlease routines that always just return -EINVAL.
Turn that into a generic routine that can live in fs/libfs.c.

Cc: <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
Cc: <cluster-devel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
Acked-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

There are no callers of these functions.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>

As Kinglong points out, the nlm_block->b_fl field is no longer used at
all. Also, vfs_test_lock in the generic locking code will only return
FILE_LOCK_DEFERRED if FL_SLEEP is set, and it isn't here.

The only other place that returns that value is the DLM lock code, but
it only does that in dlm_posix_lock, never in dlm_posix_get.

Remove all of the deferred locking code from the testlock codepath
since it doesn't appear to ever be used anyway.

I do have a small concern that this might cause a behavior change in the
case where you have a block already sitting on the list when the
testlock request comes in, but that looks like it doesn't really work
properly anyway. I think it's best to just pass that down to
vfs_test_lock and let the filesystem report that instead of trying to
infer what's going on with the lock by looking at an existing block.

Cc: cluster-devel@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
Reviewed-by: Kinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com>

v5: using nfs4_get_stateowner() instead of an inline function
v3: Update based on Jeff's comments
v2: Fix bad using of struct file_lock_operations for handle the owner
Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: Kinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>

v5: same as the first version
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: Kinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>

Commit d5b9026a ([PATCH] knfsd: locks: flag NFSv4-owned locks) using
fl_lmops field in file_lock for checking nfsd4 lockowner.

But, commit 1a747ee0 (locks: don't call ->copy_lock methods on return
of conflicting locks) causes the fl_lmops of conflock always be NULL.

Also, commit 0996905f (lockd: posix_test_lock() should not call
locks_copy_lock()) caused the fl_lmops of conflock always be NULL too.

Make sure copy the private information by fl_copy_lock() in struct
file_lock_operations, merge __locks_copy_lock() to fl_copy_lock().

Jeff advice, "Set fl_lmops on conflocks, but don't set fl_ops.
fl_ops are superfluous, since they are callbacks into the filesystem.
There should be no need to bother the filesystem at all with info
in a conflock. But, lock _ownership_ matters for conflocks and that's
indicated by the fl_lmops. So you really do want to copy the fl_lmops
for conflocks I think."

v5: add missing calling of locks_release_private() in nlmsvc_testlock()
v4: only copy fl_lmops for conflock, don't copy fl_ops
Signed-off-by: Kinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>

NFSD or other lockmanager may increase the owner's reference,
so adds two new options for copying and releasing owner.

v5: change order from 2/6 to 3/6
v4: rename lm_copy_owner/lm_release_owner to lm_get_owner/lm_put_owner
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: Kinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>

Jeff advice, " Right now __locks_copy_lock is only used to copy
conflocks. It would be good to rename that to something more
distinct (i.e.locks_copy_conflock), to make it clear that we're
generating a conflock there."

v5: change order from 3/6 to 2/6
v4: new patch only renaming function name
Signed-off-by: Kinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>

This argument is always NULL so don't pass it around.

[jlayton: remove dependencies on previous patches in series]
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>

The argument to locks_unlink_lock can't be just any pointer to a
pointer. It must be a pointer to the fl_next field in the previous
lock in the list.

Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.15+
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

This fixes an Oopsable race when starting up the callback server.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

This fixes an Oopsable race when starting lockd.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

The working group appears committed to keeping the protocol stable, the
code has gotten some use and seems to work OK.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

xprt_lookup_rqst() and bc_send_request() display a byte-swapped XID,
but receive_cb_reply() does not.
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

Recent NFS v4.2 drafts have removed NFS4ERR_METADATA_NOTSUPP and
reassigned the error code to NFS4ERR_UNION_NOTSUPP.

I also add in the NFS4ERR_OFFLOAD_NO_REQS error code.

We're not using any of these yet, so there's no harm done.
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

locks_alloc_lock() has initialized struct file_lock, no need to
re-initialize it here.
Signed-off-by: Kinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

current_task appears to be x86-only, oops.

Let's just delete this check entirely:

Any developer that adds a new user without setting rq_task will get a
crash the first time they test it.  I also don't think there are
normally any important locks held here, and I can't see any other reason
why killing a server thread would bring the whole box down.

So the effort to fail gracefully here looks like overkill.
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Fixes: 983c6844 "SUNRPC: get rid of the request wait queue"
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

One of our customer's application only needs file names, not file
attributes. With directories having 10K+ inodes (assuming buffer cache
has directory blocks cached having file names, but inode cache is
limited and hence need eviction of older cached inodes), older inodes
are evicted periodically. So if they keep on doing readdir(2) from NSF
client on multiple directories, some directory's files are periodically
removed from inode cache and hence new readdir(2) on same directory
requires disk access to bring back inodes again to inode cache.

As READDIRPLUS request fetches attributes also, doing getattr on each
file on server, it causes unnecessary disk accesses. If READDIRPLUS on
NFS client is returned with -ENOTSUPP, NFS client uses READDIR request
which just gets the names of the files in a directory, not attributes,
hence avoiding disk accesses on server.

There's already a corresponding client-side mount option, but an export
option reduces the need for configuration across multiple clients.

This flag affects NFSv3 only.  If it turns out it's needed for NFSv4 as
well then we may have to figure out how to extend the behavior to NFSv4,
but it's not currently obvious how to do that.
Signed-off-by: Rajesh Ghanekar <rajesh_ghanekar@symantec.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

As of  8c7424cf "nfsd4: don't try to encode conflicting owner if low
on space", we permit the server to process a LOCK operation even if
there might not be space to return the conflicting lockowner, because
we've made returning the conflicting lockowner optional.

However, the rpc server still wants to know the most we might possibly
return, so we need to take into account the possible conflicting
lockowner in the svc_reserve_space() call here.

Symptoms were log messages like "RPC request reserved 88 but used 108".

Fixes: 8c7424cf "nfsd4: don't try to encode conflicting owner if low on space"
Reported-by: Kinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

We do what Neil suggests now.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

When creating a file that already exists in a read-only directory with
O_EXCL, the NFSv3 server returns EACCES rather than EEXIST (which local
files and the NFSv4 server return).  Fix this by checking the MAY_CREATE
permission only if the file does not exist.  Since this already happens
in do_nfsd_create, the check in nfsd3_proc_create can simply be removed.
Signed-off-by: Ross Lagerwall <rosslagerwall@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

Currently, we hold the state_lock when releasing the lease. That's
potentially problematic in the future if we allow for setlease methods
that can sleep. Move the nfs4_put_deleg_lease call out of the delegation
unhashing routine (which was always a bit goofy anyway), and into the
unlocked sections of the callers of unhash_delegation_locked.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

Currently these fields are protected with the state_lock, but that
doesn't really make a lot of sense. These fields are "private" to the
nfs4_file, and can be protected with the more granular fi_lock.

The fi_lock is already held when setting these fields. Make the code
hold the fp->fi_lock when clearing the lease-related fields in the
nfs4_file, and no longer require that the state_lock be held when
calling into this function.

To prevent lock inversion with the i_lock, we also move the vfs_setlease
and fput calls outside of the fi_lock. This also sets us up for allowing
vfs_setlease calls to block in the future.

Finally, remove a redundant NULL pointer check. unhash_delegation_locked
locks the fp->fi_lock prior to that check, so fp in that function must
never be NULL.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

We would normally expect the xid and the checksum to be the best
discriminators. Check them before looking at the procedure number,
etc.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

...so we can remove the spinlocking around it.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

Now that the lru list is per-bucket, we don't need a second list for
searches.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

We really do not want to do ioctls in the server's fast path. Instead, let's
use the fact that we managed to read a full record as the indicator that
we should try to read the socket again.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

Just move the transport locking out of the spin lock protected area
altogether.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

We should definitely not be exiting svc_get_next_xprt() with the
thread enqueued. Fix this by ensuring that we fall through to
the dequeue.
Also move the test itself outside the spin lock protected section.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

We're always _only_ waking up tasks from within the sp_threads list, so
we know that they are enqueued and alive. The rq_wait waitqueue is just
a distraction with extra atomic semantics.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>

We already determined that there was enough wspace when we
called svc_xprt_enqueue.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>