- 03 Sep, 2014 40 commits
-
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
Instead of allocating a var to store 0 and just return it, change the code to return 0 directly. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
Instead of allocating a var to store 0 and just return it, change the code to return 0 directly. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
Instead of allocating a var to store 0 and just return it, change the code to return 0 directly. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
Instead of allocating a var to store 0 and just return it, change the code to return 0 directly. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
Instead of allocating a var to store 0 and just return it, change the code to return 0 directly. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
Instead of allocating a var to store 0 and just return it, change the code to return 0 directly. Acked-by: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
Instead of allocating a var to store 0 and just return it, change the code to return 0 directly. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
Instead of allocating a var to store 0 and just return it, change the code to return 0 directly. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
Instead of allocating a var to store 0 and just return it, change the code to return 0 directly. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
Instead of allocating a var to store 0 and just return it, change the code to return 0 directly. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
Instead of allocating a var to store 0 and just return it, change the code to return 0 directly. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
Make sure pm_runtime_* calls does not use unnecessary IS_ERR_VALUE(). Reported by scripts/coccinelle/api/pm_runtime.cocci script. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
Instead of using if (foo == false), just use if (!foo). That allows a faster mental parsing when analyzing the code. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
Instead of using if (foo == false), just use if (!foo). That allows a faster mental parsing when analyzing the code. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
instead of testing bools if they are false or true, just use if (!foo) or if (foo). That makes the code easier to read and shorter. Also, properly initialize booleans with true or false. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
lml33dpatch is boolean. So, the possible values are true or false. Instead of using if (lml33dpath), just use if (!lml33dpath). That allows a faster mental parsing when analyzing the code. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
Instead of using if (on == true), just use if (on). That allows a faster mental parsing when analyzing the code. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
instead of testing if it is false or true, just use if (!foo) or if (foo). That makes the code easier to read and shorter. Also, properly initialize booleans with true or false. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
Instead of using if (foo == false), just use if (!foo). That allows a faster mental parsing when analyzing the code. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
Instead of using 0 or 1 for boolean, use the true/false defines. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
Instead of using 0 or 1 for boolean, use the true/false defines. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
Instead of using 0 or 1 for boolean, use the true/false defines. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
Instead of using 0 or 1 for boolean, use the true/false defines. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
Instead of using 0 or 1 for boolean, use the true/false defines. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
Instead of using 0 or 1 for boolean, use the true/false defines. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
Instead of using 0 or 1 for boolean, use the true/false defines. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
Instead of using 0 or 1 for boolean, use the true/false defines. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
Instead of using 0 or 1 for boolean, use the true/false defines. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
Instead of using 0 or 1 for boolean, use the true/false defines. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
Instead of using 0 or 1 for boolean, use the true/false defines. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
Instead of using 0 or 1 for boolean, use the true/false defines. Also, instead of testing foo == false, just use the simplified notation if(!foo). Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
Instead of using 0 or 1 for boolean, use the true/false defines. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
Instead of using 0 or 1 for boolean, use the true/false defines. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
Instead of using 0 or 1 for boolean, use the true/false defines. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
Instead of using 0 or 1 for boolean, use the true/false defines. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
Instead of using 0 or 1 for boolean, use the true/false defines. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
The error return code STV0900_NO_ERROR happens only once, at the end of the functions. So, just return it directly. This driver should actually be fixed to return standard Linux error codes, instead of its own macros, but this should be done on a separate patchset. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
We don't use semicolons after curly braces in the middle of the code. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
We don't use semicolons after curly braces in the middle of the code. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>
-
Mauro Carvalho Chehab authored
We don't use semicolons after curly braces in the middle of the code. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>
-