1. 04 Nov, 2013 9 commits
  2. 03 Nov, 2013 3 commits
  3. 02 Nov, 2013 2 commits
  4. 01 Nov, 2013 23 commits
  5. 31 Oct, 2013 3 commits
    • Linus Torvalds's avatar
      Merge branch 'akpm' (fixes from Andrew Morton) · 4f794ee8
      Linus Torvalds authored
      Merge four more fixes from Andrew Morton.
      
      * emailed patches from Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>:
        lib/scatterlist.c: don't flush_kernel_dcache_page on slab page
        mm: memcg: fix test for child groups
        mm: memcg: lockdep annotation for memcg OOM lock
        mm: memcg: use proper memcg in limit bypass
      4f794ee8
    • Ming Lei's avatar
      lib/scatterlist.c: don't flush_kernel_dcache_page on slab page · 3d77b50c
      Ming Lei authored
      Commit b1adaf65 ("[SCSI] block: add sg buffer copy helper
      functions") introduces two sg buffer copy helpers, and calls
      flush_kernel_dcache_page() on pages in SG list after these pages are
      written to.
      
      Unfortunately, the commit may introduce a potential bug:
      
       - Before sending some SCSI commands, kmalloc() buffer may be passed to
         block layper, so flush_kernel_dcache_page() can see a slab page
         finally
      
       - According to cachetlb.txt, flush_kernel_dcache_page() is only called
         on "a user page", which surely can't be a slab page.
      
       - ARCH's implementation of flush_kernel_dcache_page() may use page
         mapping information to do optimization so page_mapping() will see the
         slab page, then VM_BUG_ON() is triggered.
      
      Aaro Koskinen reported the bug on ARM/kirkwood when DEBUG_VM is enabled,
      and this patch fixes the bug by adding test of '!PageSlab(miter->page)'
      before calling flush_kernel_dcache_page().
      Signed-off-by: default avatarMing Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>
      Reported-by: default avatarAaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi>
      Tested-by: default avatarSimon Baatz <gmbnomis@gmail.com>
      Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
      Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
      Cc: Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi>
      Acked-by: default avatarCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
      Cc: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
      Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
      Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@parallels.com>
      Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
      Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>	[3.2+]
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      3d77b50c
    • Johannes Weiner's avatar
      mm: memcg: fix test for child groups · 696ac172
      Johannes Weiner authored
      When memcg code needs to know whether any given memcg has children, it
      uses the cgroup child iteration primitives and returns true/false
      depending on whether the iteration loop is executed at least once or
      not.
      
      Because a cgroup's list of children is RCU protected, these primitives
      require the RCU read-lock to be held, which is not the case for all
      memcg callers.  This results in the following splat when e.g.  enabling
      hierarchy mode:
      
        WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 1 at kernel/cgroup.c:3043 css_next_child+0xa3/0x160()
        CPU: 3 PID: 1 Comm: systemd Not tainted 3.12.0-rc5-00117-g83f11a9c-dirty #18
        Hardware name: LENOVO 3680B56/3680B56, BIOS 6QET69WW (1.39 ) 04/26/2012
        Call Trace:
          dump_stack+0x54/0x74
          warn_slowpath_common+0x78/0xa0
          warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20
          css_next_child+0xa3/0x160
          mem_cgroup_hierarchy_write+0x5b/0xa0
          cgroup_file_write+0x108/0x2a0
          vfs_write+0xbd/0x1e0
          SyS_write+0x4c/0xa0
          system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
      
      In the memcg case, we only care about children when we are attempting to
      modify inheritable attributes interactively.  Racing with deletion could
      mean a spurious -EBUSY, no problem.  Racing with addition is handled
      just fine as well through the memcg_create_mutex: if the child group is
      not on the list after the mutex is acquired, it won't be initialized
      from the parent's attributes until after the unlock.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
      Acked-by: default avatarMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      696ac172