Instead of using DVBv3 parameters, rely on DVBv5 parameters to
set the tuner
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

Instead of using DVBv3 parameters, rely on DVBv5 parameters to
set the tuner
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

Instead of using DVBv3 parameters, rely on DVBv5 parameters to
set the tuner
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

Instead of using DVBv3 parameters, rely on DVBv5 parameters to
set the tuner
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

Instead of using DVBv3 parameters, rely on DVBv5 parameters to
set the tuner
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

Instead of using DVBv3 parameters, rely on DVBv5 parameters to
set the tuner
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

Instead of using DVBv3 parameters, rely on DVBv5 parameters to
set the tuner
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

Instead of using DVBv3 parameters, rely on DVBv5 parameters to
set the tuner
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

Instead of using DVBv3 parameters, rely on DVBv5 parameters to
set the tuner
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

Instead of using DVBv3 parameters, rely on DVBv5 parameters to
set the tuner
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

Instead of using DVBv3 parameters, rely on DVBv5 parameters to
set the tuner
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

Instead of using DVBv3 parameters, rely on DVBv5 parameters to
set the tuner
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

Instead of using DVBv3 parameters, rely on DVBv5 parameters to
set the tuner
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

Instead of using DVBv3 parameters, rely on DVBv5 parameters to
set the tuner.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

Instead of using DVBv3 parameters, rely on DVBv5 parameters to
set the tuner.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

Instead of using DVBv3 parameters, rely on DVBv5 parameters to
set the tuner.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

Instead of using DVBv3 parameters, rely on DVBv5 parameters to
set the tuner.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

This standard is not properly documented, but its settings are at
the tda18271dd driver, and are somewhat obvious, as they follow
the same logic as DVB-T 7MHz.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

Instead of using DVBv3 parameters, rely on DVBv5 parameters to
set the tuner.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

Instead of using DVBv3 parameters, rely on DVBv5 parameters to
set the tuner.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

There is a bug on mxl5005s logic: when the bandwidth changes, but using
the same delivery system, the code discard the set_params()
reconfiguration request.

This was happening because, in the previous coding, the bandwidth
calculus were after the check for delivery system changes.

The previous patch changed the logic to estimate the bandwidth to
happend together with the changes at the delivery system.

So, with a one-statement change, it is possible to make the tuner to
reconfigure, in order to adjust to bandwidth changes. this will
likely fix issues on countries that use 7MHz/8MHz DVB-T channels.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

Instead of using DVBv3 parameters, rely on DVBv5 parameters to
set the tuner.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

Instead of using DVBv3 parameters, rely on DVBv5 parameters to
set the tuner.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

Instead of using DVBv3 parameters, rely on DVBv5 parameters to
set the tuner.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

Instead of using DVBv3 parameters, rely on DVBv5 parameters to
set the tuner.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

This driver implements a fake get_bandwidth() callback. In
reallity, the tuner driver won't adjust its low-pass
filter based on a bandwidth, and were just providing a fake
method for demods to read whatever was "set".

This code is useless, as none of the drivers that use
this tuner seems to require a get_bandwidth() callback.

While here, convert set_params to use the DVBv5 way to pass
parameters to tuners.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

This driver implements a fake get_bandwidth() callback. In
reallity, the tuner driver won't adjust its low-pass
filter based on a bandwidth, and were just providing a fake
method for demods to read whatever was "set".

This code is useless, as none of the drivers that use
this tuner seems to require a get_bandwidth() callback.

While here, convert set_params to use the DVBv5 way to pass
parameters to tuners.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

This driver implements a fake get_bandwidth() callback. In
reallity, the tuner driver won't adjust its low-pass
filter based on a bandwidth, and were just providing a fake
method for demods to read whatever was "set".

This code is useless, as none of the drivers that use
this tuner seems to require a get_bandwidth() callback.

While here, convert set_params to use the DVBv5 way to pass
parameters to tuners.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

Instead of just estimating the bandwidth for DVB-C annex A/C,
also fill it at the core for ATSC and DVB-C annex B. This
simplifies the logic inside the tuners, as all non-satellite
tuners can just use c->bandwidth_hz for all supported
delivery systems.

It could make sense to latter use it also for satellite
systems, as several DVB-S drivers have their own calculus.
However, on DVB-S2 the bw estimation is a little more complex,
and the existing drivers have some optimized calculus for
bandwidth. So, let's not touch on it for now.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

SYS_DVBC_ANNEX_AC is an alias for SYS_DVBC_ANNEX_A. However,
the first one is incorrect, as not all devices support both.
So, replace its occurrences by the proper value (either
SYS_DVBC_ANNEX_A or both SYS_DVBC_ANNEX_A and SYS_DVBC_ANNEX_C).
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

dvb_register calls videobuf_dvb_register_bus, but if that returns
a failure the module will be unloaded without clearing the
value of core->gate_ctrl which will cause an oops in macros
called from video_open in cx88-video.c
Signed-off-by: David Fries <David@Fries.net>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead.org>
Cc: Istvan Varga <istvan_v@mailbox.hu>
Cc: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

dprintk() dereferences "ir".  I'm not sure why gcc doesn't complain
about this.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

This patch adds Kworld 355U and 380U support
Signed-off-by: Aivar Päkk <aivar11@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

Stop dual frontend attach in warm state with single devices.

Since this is a no reconnect device this occurs only after a warm system
reboot.
Signed-off-by: Malcolm Priestley <tvboxspy@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

Re: [git:v4l-dvb/for_v3.3] [media] it9135:  add support for IT9135 9005 devices
On Sun, 2011-12-11 at 11:55 +0100, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> This is an automatic generated email to let you know that the following patch were queued at the
> http://git.linuxtv.org/media_tree.git tree:
>
> Subject: [media] it9135:  add support for IT9135 9005 devices
> Author:  Malcolm Priestley <tvboxspy@gmail.com>
> Date:    Wed Nov 30 17:16:09 2011 -0300
>
> Support add for IT9135 9005 devices
>
> With this patch IT9135 devices now move to using
> dvb-usb-it9135-01.fw firmware
> IT9137 remain on previous firmware.
Hi Mauro,

I have made a small mistake on this patch.

I forgot to increase number of num_device_descs to 4.
Signed-off-by: Malcolm Priestley <tvboxspy@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

The advantage of kcalloc is, that will prevent integer overflows which could
result from the multiplication of number of elements and size and it is also
a bit nicer to read.

The semantic patch that makes this change is available
in https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/11/25/107Signed-off-by: Thomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

The advantage of kcalloc is, that will prevent integer overflows which could
result from the multiplication of number of elements and size and it is also
a bit nicer to read.

The semantic patch that makes this change is available
in https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/11/25/107Signed-off-by: Thomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

The advantage of kcalloc is, that will prevent integer overflows which could
result from the multiplication of number of elements and size and it is also
a bit nicer to read.

The semantic patch that makes this change is available
in https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/11/25/107Signed-off-by: Thomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de>
Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

The advantage of kcalloc is, that will prevent integer overflows which could
result from the multiplication of number of elements and size and it is also
a bit nicer to read.

The semantic patch that makes this change is available
in https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/11/25/107Signed-off-by: Thomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>