Skip to content

L
linux
Switch branch/tag
  1. 30 May, 2015 3 commits
  3. 29 May, 2015 30 commits
  5. 28 May, 2015 7 commits
    • Dave Airlie's avatar
      Merge branch 'drm-fixes-4.1' of git://people.freedesktop.org/~agd5f/linux into drm-fixes · d641958f
      Dave Airlie authored 
      one more regression fix, partial revert.

* 'drm-fixes-4.1' of git://people.freedesktop.org/~agd5f/linux:
  drm/radeon: partially revert "fix VM_CONTEXT*_PAGE_TABLE_END_ADDR handling"
      d641958f
    • Brian Foster's avatar
      xfs: fix broken i_nlink accounting for whiteout tmpfile inode · 22419ac9
      Brian Foster authored 
      XFS uses the internal tmpfile() infrastructure for the whiteout inode
used for RENAME_WHITEOUT operations. For tmpfile inodes, XFS allocates
the inode, drops di_nlink, adds the inode to the agi unlinked list,
calls d_tmpfile() which correspondingly drops i_nlink of the vfs inode,
and then finishes the common inode setup (e.g., clear I_NEW and unlock).

The d_tmpfile() call was originally made inxfs_create_tmpfile(), but was
pulled up out of that function as part of the following commit to
resolve a deadlock issue:

	330033d6 xfs: fix tmpfile/selinux deadlock and initialize security

As a result, callers of xfs_create_tmpfile() are responsible for either
calling d_tmpfile() or fixing up i_nlink appropriately. The whiteout
tmpfile allocation helper does neither. As a result, the vfs ->i_nlink
becomes inconsistent with the on-disk ->di_nlink once xfs_rename() links
it back into the source dentry and calls xfs_bumplink().

Update the assert in xfs_rename() to help detect this problem in the
future and update xfs_rename_alloc_whiteout() to decrement the link
count as part of the manual tmpfile inode setup.
Signed-off-by: default avatarBrian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
      22419ac9
    • Dave Chinner's avatar
      xfs: xfs_iozero can return positive errno · cddc1162
      Dave Chinner authored 
      It was missed when we converted everything in XFs to use negative error
numbers, so fix it now. Bug introduced in 3.17 by commit 2451337d ("xfs: global
error sign conversion"), and should go back to stable kernels.

Thanks to Brian Foster for noticing it.

cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.17, 3.18, 3.19, 4.0
Signed-off-by: default avatarDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarBrian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
      cddc1162
    • Dave Chinner's avatar
      xfs: xfs_attr_inactive leaves inconsistent attr fork state behind · 6dfe5a04
      Dave Chinner authored 
      xfs_attr_inactive() is supposed to clean up the attribute fork when
the inode is being freed. While it removes attribute fork extents,
it completely ignores attributes in local format, which means that
there can still be active attributes on the inode after
xfs_attr_inactive() has run.

This leads to problems with concurrent inode writeback - the in-core
inode attribute fork is removed without locking on the assumption
that nothing will be attempting to access the attribute fork after a
call to xfs_attr_inactive() because it isn't supposed to exist on
disk any more.

To fix this, make xfs_attr_inactive() completely remove all traces
of the attribute fork from the inode, regardless of it's state.
Further, also remove the in-core attribute fork structure safely so
that there is nothing further that needs to be done by callers to
clean up the attribute fork. This means we can remove the in-core
and on-disk attribute forks atomically.

Also, on error simply remove the in-memory attribute fork. There's
nothing that can be done with it once we have failed to remove the
on-disk attribute fork, so we may as well just blow it away here
anyway.

cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.12 to 4.0
Reported-by: default avatarWaiman Long <waiman.long@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarBrian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
      6dfe5a04
    • Dave Chinner's avatar
      xfs: extent size hints can round up extents past MAXEXTLEN · 6dea405e
      Dave Chinner authored 
      This results in BMBT corruption, as seen by this test:

# mkfs.xfs -f -d size=40051712b,agcount=4 /dev/vdc
....
# mount /dev/vdc /mnt/scratch
# xfs_io -ft -c "extsize 16m" -c "falloc 0 30g" -c "bmap -vp" /mnt/scratch/foo

which results in this failure on a debug kernel:

XFS: Assertion failed: (blockcount & xfs_mask64hi(64-BMBT_BLOCKCOUNT_BITLEN)) == 0, file: fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap_btree.c, line: 211
....
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff814cf0ff>] xfs_bmbt_set_allf+0x8f/0x100
 [<ffffffff814cf18d>] xfs_bmbt_set_all+0x1d/0x20
 [<ffffffff814f2efe>] xfs_iext_insert+0x9e/0x120
 [<ffffffff814c7956>] ? xfs_bmap_add_extent_hole_real+0x1c6/0xc70
 [<ffffffff814c7956>] xfs_bmap_add_extent_hole_real+0x1c6/0xc70
 [<ffffffff814caaab>] xfs_bmapi_write+0x72b/0xed0
 [<ffffffff811c72ac>] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x15c/0x170
 [<ffffffff814fe070>] xfs_alloc_file_space+0x160/0x400
 [<ffffffff81ddcc29>] ? down_write+0x29/0x60
 [<ffffffff815063eb>] xfs_file_fallocate+0x29b/0x310
 [<ffffffff811d2bc8>] ? __sb_start_write+0x58/0x120
 [<ffffffff811e3e18>] ? do_vfs_ioctl+0x318/0x570
 [<ffffffff811cd680>] vfs_fallocate+0x140/0x260
 [<ffffffff811ce6f8>] SyS_fallocate+0x48/0x80
 [<ffffffff81ddec09>] system_call_fastpath+0x12/0x17

The tracepoint that indicates the extent that triggered the assert
failure is:

xfs_iext_insert:   idx 0 offset 0 block 16777224 count 2097152 flag 1

Clearly indicating that the extent length is greater than MAXEXTLEN,
which is 2097151. A prior trace point shows the allocation was an
exact size match and that a length greater than MAXEXTLEN was asked
for:

xfs_alloc_size_done:  agno 1 agbno 8 minlen 2097152 maxlen 2097152
					    ^^^^^^^        ^^^^^^^

We don't see this problem with extent size hints through the IO path
because we can't do single IOs large enough to trigger MAXEXTLEN
allocation. fallocate(), OTOH, is not limited in it's allocation
sizes and so needs help here.

The issue is that the extent size hint alignment is rounding up the
extent size past MAXEXTLEN, because xfs_bmapi_write() is not taking
into account extent size hints when calculating the maximum extent
length to allocate. xfs_bmapi_reserve_delalloc() is already doing
this, but direct extent allocation is not.

Unfortunately, the calculation in xfs_bmapi_reserve_delalloc() is
wrong, and it works only because delayed allocation extents are not
limited in size to MAXEXTLEN in the in-core extent tree. hence this
calculation does not work for direct allocation, and the delalloc
code needs fixing. This may, in fact be the underlying bug that
occassionally causes transaction overruns in delayed allocation
extent conversion, so now we know it's wrong we should fix it, too.
Many thanks to Brian Foster for finding this problem during review
of this patch.

Hence the fix, after much code reading, is to allow
xfs_bmap_extsize_align() to align partial extents when full
alignment would extend the alignment past MAXEXTLEN. We can safely
do this because all callers have higher layer allocation loops that
already handle short allocations, and so will simply run another
allocation to cover the remainder of the requested allocation range
that we ignored during alignment. The advantage of this approach is
that it also removes the need for callers to do anything other than
limit their requests to MAXEXTLEN - they don't really need to be
aware of extent size hints at all.
Signed-off-by: default avatarDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarBrian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
      6dea405e
    • Dave Chinner's avatar
      xfs: inode and free block counters need to use __percpu_counter_compare · 8c1903d3
      Dave Chinner authored 
      Because the counters use a custom batch size, the comparison
functions need to be aware of that batch size otherwise the
comparison does not work correctly. This leads to ASSERT failures
on generic/027 like this:

 XFS: Assertion failed: 0, file: fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c, line: 1099
 ------------[ cut here ]------------
....
 Call Trace:
  [<ffffffff81522a39>] xfs_mod_icount+0x99/0xc0
  [<ffffffff815285cb>] xfs_trans_unreserve_and_mod_sb+0x28b/0x5b0
  [<ffffffff8152f941>] xfs_log_commit_cil+0x321/0x580
  [<ffffffff81528e17>] xfs_trans_commit+0xb7/0x260
  [<ffffffff81503d4d>] xfs_bmap_finish+0xcd/0x1b0
  [<ffffffff8151da41>] xfs_inactive_ifree+0x1e1/0x250
  [<ffffffff8151dbe0>] xfs_inactive+0x130/0x200
  [<ffffffff81523a21>] xfs_fs_evict_inode+0x91/0xf0
  [<ffffffff811f3958>] evict+0xb8/0x190
  [<ffffffff811f433b>] iput+0x18b/0x1f0
  [<ffffffff811e8853>] do_unlinkat+0x1f3/0x320
  [<ffffffff811d548a>] ? filp_close+0x5a/0x80
  [<ffffffff811e999b>] SyS_unlinkat+0x1b/0x40
  [<ffffffff81e0892e>] system_call_fastpath+0x12/0x71

This is a regression introduced by commit 501ab323 ("xfs: use generic
percpu counters for inode counter").

This patch fixes the same problem for both the inode counter and the
free block counter in the superblocks.
Signed-off-by: default avatarDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarBrian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
      8c1903d3
    • Dave Chinner's avatar
      percpu_counter: batch size aware __percpu_counter_compare() · 80188b0d
      Dave Chinner authored 
      XFS uses non-stanard batch sizes for avoiding frequent global
counter updates on it's allocated inode counters, as they increment
or decrement in batches of 64 inodes. Hence the standard percpu
counter batch of 32 means that the counter is effectively a global
counter. Currently Xfs uses a batch size of 128 so that it doesn't
take the global lock on every single modification.

However, Xfs also needs to compare accurately against zero, which
means we need to use percpu_counter_compare(), and that has a
hard-coded batch size of 32, and hence will spuriously fail to
detect when it is supposed to use precise comparisons and hence
the accounting goes wrong.

Add __percpu_counter_compare() to take a custom batch size so we can
use it sanely in XFS and factor percpu_counter_compare() to use it.
Signed-off-by: default avatarDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Acked-by: default avatarTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
      80188b0d
GitLab Nexedi Edition | About GitLab | About Nexedi | 沪ICP备2021021310号-2 | 沪ICP备2021021310号-7