- 15 Oct, 2018 40 commits
-
-
Qu Wenruo authored
Function btrfs_trim_fs() doesn't handle errors in a consistent way. If error happens when trimming existing block groups, it will skip the remaining blocks and continue to trim unallocated space for each device. The return value will only reflect the final error from device trimming. This patch will fix such behavior by: 1) Recording the last error from block group or device trimming The return value will also reflect the last error during trimming. Make developer more aware of the problem. 2) Continuing trimming if possible If we failed to trim one block group or device, we could still try the next block group or device. 3) Report number of failures during block group and device trimming It would be less noisy, but still gives user a brief summary of what's going wrong. Such behavior can avoid confusion for cases like failure to trim the first block group and then only unallocated space is trimmed. Reported-by: Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [ add bg_ret and dev_ret to the messages ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Jeff Mahoney authored
When we fail to start a transaction in btrfs_dev_replace_start, we leave dev_replace->replace_start set to STARTED but clear ->srcdev and ->tgtdev. Later, that can result in an Oops in btrfs_dev_replace_progress when having state set to STARTED or SUSPENDED implies that ->srcdev is valid. Also fix error handling when the state is already STARTED or SUSPENDED while starting. That, too, will clear ->srcdev and ->tgtdev even though it doesn't own them. This should be an impossible case to hit since we should be protected by the BTRFS_FS_EXCL_OP bit being set. Let's add an ASSERT there while we're at it. Fixes: e93c89c1 (Btrfs: add new sources for device replace code) CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
zhong jiang authored
remove_extent_mapping uses the variable "ret" for return value, but it is not modified after initialzation. Further, I find that any of the callers do not handle the return value and the callees are only simple functions so the return values does not need to be passed. Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
In btrfs_search_old_slot get_old_root is always used with the assumption it cannot fail. However, this is not true in rare circumstance it can fail and return null. This will lead to null point dereference when the header is read. Fix this by checking the return value and properly handling NULL by setting ret to -EIO and returning gracefully. Coverity-id: 1087503 Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
In btrfs_orphan_cleanup the final 'if (ret) goto out' cannot ever be executed. This is due to the last assignment to 'ret' depending on the return value of btrfs_iget. If an error other than -ENOENT is returned then the loop is prematurely terminated by 'goto out'. On the other hand, if the error value is ENOENT then a subsequent if branch is executed that always re-assigns 'ret' and in case it's an error just terminates the loop. No functional changes. Coverity-id: 1437392 Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Liu Bo authored
When we delete an inode, btrfs_evict_inode() { truncate_inode_pages_final() truncate_inode_pages_range() lock_page() truncate_cleanup_page() btrfs_invalidatepage() wait_on_page_writeback btrfs_lookup_ordered_range() cancel_dirty_page() unlock_page() ... btrfs_wait_ordered_range() ... As VFS has called ->invalidatepage() to get all ordered extents done (if there are any) and truncated all page cache pages (no dirty pages to writeback after this step), wait_ordered_range() is just a noop. Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Liu Bo authored
As long as @eb is marked with EXTENT_BUFFER_DIRTY, all of its pages are dirty, so no need to set pages dirty again. Ftrace showed that the loop took 10us on my dev box, so removing this can save us at least 10us if eb is already dirty and otherwise avoid a potentially expensive calls to set_page_dirty. Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Liu Bo authored
Just in case that someone breaks the rule that pages are dirty as long as eb is dirty. The next patch will dirty the pages conditionally. Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Liu Bo authored
In the callchain: btrfs_search_slot() if (level != 0) setup_nodes_for_search() balance_level() It is just impossible to have level=0 in balance_level, we can drop the check. Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Liu Bo authored
Unify the error handling of directory item lookups using IS_ERR_OR_NULL. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Liu Bo authored
kcalloc is defined as: kcalloc(size_t n, size_t size, gfp_t flags) Although this won't cause problems in practice, btrfsic_read_block() uses kcalloc with n and size in the opposite order. Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
Instead of returning an error value and using one of the parameters for returning the actual object we are interested in just refactor the function to directly return btrfs_device *. Also bubble up the error handling for the special BTRFS_ERROR_DEV_MISSING_NOT_FOUND value into btrfs_rm_device. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
This function returns a numeric error value and additionally the device found in one of its input parameters. Simplify this by making the function directly return a pointer to btrfs_device. Additionally adjust the caller to handle the case when we want to remove the 'missing' device and ENOENT is returned to return the expected positive error value, parsed by progs. Finally, unexport the function since it's not called outside of volume.c. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
Currently this function returns an error code as well as uses one of its arguments as a return value for struct btrfs_device. Change the function so that it returns btrfs_device directly and use the usual "encode error in pointer" mechanics if something goes wrong. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Jeff Mahoney authored
When we hit an I/O error in free_log_tree->walk_log_tree during file system shutdown we can crash due to there not being a valid transaction handle. Use btrfs_handle_fs_error when there's no transaction handle to use. BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000060 IP: free_log_tree+0xd2/0x140 [btrfs] PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC PTI Modules linked in: <modules> CPU: 2 PID: 23544 Comm: umount Tainted: G W 4.12.14-kvmsmall #9 SLE15 (unreleased) Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.0.0-prebuilt.qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 task: ffff96bfd3478880 task.stack: ffffa7cf40d78000 RIP: 0010:free_log_tree+0xd2/0x140 [btrfs] RSP: 0018:ffffa7cf40d7bd10 EFLAGS: 00010282 RAX: 00000000fffffffb RBX: 00000000fffffffb RCX: 0000000000000002 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff96c02f07d4c8 RDI: 0000000000000282 RBP: ffff96c013cf1000 R08: ffff96c02f07d4c8 R09: ffff96c02f07d4d0 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000002 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: ffff96c005e800c0 R14: ffffa7cf40d7bdb8 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 00007f17856bcfc0(0000) GS:ffff96c03f600000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000000000060 CR3: 0000000045ed6002 CR4: 00000000003606e0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: ? wait_for_writer+0xb0/0xb0 [btrfs] btrfs_free_log+0x17/0x30 [btrfs] btrfs_drop_and_free_fs_root+0x9a/0xe0 [btrfs] btrfs_free_fs_roots+0xc0/0x130 [btrfs] ? wait_for_completion+0xf2/0x100 close_ctree+0xea/0x2e0 [btrfs] ? kthread_stop+0x161/0x260 generic_shutdown_super+0x6c/0x120 kill_anon_super+0xe/0x20 btrfs_kill_super+0x13/0x100 [btrfs] deactivate_locked_super+0x3f/0x70 cleanup_mnt+0x3b/0x70 task_work_run+0x78/0x90 exit_to_usermode_loop+0x77/0xa6 do_syscall_64+0x1c5/0x1e0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x42/0xb7 RIP: 0033:0x7f1784f90827 RSP: 002b:00007ffdeeb03118 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a6 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000556a60c62970 RCX: 00007f1784f90827 RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000556a60c62b50 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000005 R09: 00000000ffffffff R10: 0000556a60c63900 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000556a60c62b50 R13: 00007f17854a81c4 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000 RIP: free_log_tree+0xd2/0x140 [btrfs] RSP: ffffa7cf40d7bd10 CR2: 0000000000000060 Fixes: 681ae509 ("Btrfs: cleanup reserved space when freeing tree log on error") CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.13 Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Misono Tomohiro authored
Since commit d7df2c79 ("Btrfs attach delayed ref updates to delayed ref heads"), check_delayed_ref() won't return -ENOENT. In btrfs_cross_ref_exist(), two variables 'ret' and 'ret2' are originally used to handle -ENOENT error case. Since the code is not needed anymore, let's just remove 'ret2'. Signed-off-by: Misono Tomohiro <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Liu Bo authored
Unless it's going to read inline extents from btree leaf to page, btrfs_get_extent won't sleep during the period of holding path lock. This sets leave_spinning at first and sets path to blocking mode right before reading inline extent if that's the case. The benefit is that a path in spinning mode typically has lower impact (faster) on waiters rather than that in the blocking mode. Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Liu Bo authored
This fixes btrfs_get_extent to be consistent with our existing declaration style. Note: For the record, indentation styles that are accepted are both, aligning under the opening ( and tab or double tab indentation on the next line. Preferrably not spliting the type or long expressions in the argument lists. Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com> [ add note ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Colin Ian King authored
Pointer 'tree' is being assigned but is never used hence it is redundant and can be removed. This is a leftover from cleanup patch 00032d38 ("btrfs: drop extent_io_ops::merge_bio_hook callback"). Cleans up clang warning: warning: variable 'tree' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Colin Ian King authored
Pointer inode is being assigned but is never used hence it is redundant and can be removed. It's been unused since the introduction in 38c227d8 ("Btrfs: snapshot-aware defrag"). Cleans up clang warning: variable ‘inode’ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Su Yue authored
Since commit 8b62f87b ("Btrfs: rework outstanding_extents"), manual operations of outstanding_extent in btrfs_inode are replaced by btrfs_mod_outstanding_extents(). The one in cluster_pages_for_defrag seems to be lost, so replace it of btrfs_mod_outstanding_extents(). Fixes: 8b62f87b ("Btrfs: rework outstanding_extents") Signed-off-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Liu Bo authored
Here we're not releasing any space, but transferring bytes from ->bytes_may_use to ->bytes_reserved. The last change to the code in commit 18513091 ("btrfs: update btrfs_space_info's bytes_may_use timely") removed a conditional tracepoint and the logic changed too but the tracepiont remained. Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [ update changelog ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Liu Bo authored
trace_btrfs_get_extent() has nothing to do with path, place btrfs_free_path ahead so that we can unlock path on error. Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Liu Bo authored
As next_state() is already defined to get the next state, use it in find_first_extent_bit. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Qu Wenruo authored
[BUG] For certain crafted image, whose csum root leaf has missing backref, if we try to trigger write with data csum, it could cause deadlock with the following kernel WARN_ON(): WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 41 at fs/btrfs/locking.c:230 btrfs_tree_lock+0x3e2/0x400 CPU: 1 PID: 41 Comm: kworker/u4:1 Not tainted 4.18.0-rc1+ #8 Workqueue: btrfs-endio-write btrfs_endio_write_helper RIP: 0010:btrfs_tree_lock+0x3e2/0x400 Call Trace: btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x39f/0x770 __btrfs_cow_block+0x285/0x9e0 btrfs_cow_block+0x191/0x2e0 btrfs_search_slot+0x492/0x1160 btrfs_lookup_csum+0xec/0x280 btrfs_csum_file_blocks+0x2be/0xa60 add_pending_csums+0xaf/0xf0 btrfs_finish_ordered_io+0x74b/0xc90 finish_ordered_fn+0x15/0x20 normal_work_helper+0xf6/0x500 btrfs_endio_write_helper+0x12/0x20 process_one_work+0x302/0x770 worker_thread+0x81/0x6d0 kthread+0x180/0x1d0 ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40 [CAUSE] That crafted image has missing backref for csum tree root leaf. And when we try to allocate new tree block, since there is no EXTENT/METADATA_ITEM for csum tree root, btrfs consider it's free slot and use it. The extent tree of the image looks like: Normal image | This fuzzed image ----------------------------------+-------------------------------- BG 29360128 | BG 29360128 One empty slot | One empty slot 29364224: backref to UUID tree | 29364224: backref to UUID tree Two empty slots | Two empty slots 29376512: backref to CSUM tree | One empty slot (bad type) <<< 29380608: backref to D_RELOC tree | 29380608: backref to D_RELOC tree ... | ... Since bytenr 29376512 has no METADATA/EXTENT_ITEM, when btrfs try to alloc tree block, it's an valid slot for btrfs. And for finish_ordered_write, when we need to insert csum, we try to CoW csum tree root. By accident, empty slots at bytenr BG_OFFSET, BG_OFFSET + 8K, BG_OFFSET + 12K is already used by tree block COW for other trees, the next empty slot is BG_OFFSET + 16K, which should be the backref for CSUM tree. But due to the bad type, btrfs can recognize it and still consider it as an empty slot, and will try to use it for csum tree CoW. Then in the following call trace, we will try to lock the new tree block, which turns out to be the old csum tree root which is already locked: btrfs_search_slot() called on csum tree root, which is at 29376512 |- btrfs_cow_block() |- btrfs_set_lock_block() | |- Now locks tree block 29376512 (old csum tree root) |- __btrfs_cow_block() |- btrfs_alloc_tree_block() |- btrfs_reserve_extent() | Now it returns tree block 29376512, which extent tree | shows its empty slot, but it's already hold by csum tree |- btrfs_init_new_buffer() |- btrfs_tree_lock() | Triggers WARN_ON(eb->lock_owner == current->pid) |- wait_event() Wait lock owner to release the lock, but it's locked by ourself, so it will deadlock [FIX] This patch will do the lock_owner and current->pid check at btrfs_init_new_buffer(). So above deadlock can be avoided. Since such problem can only happen in crafted image, we will still trigger kernel warning for later aborted transaction, but with a little more meaningful warning message. Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200405Reported-by: Xu Wen <wen.xu@gatech.edu> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Qu Wenruo authored
[BUG] When mounting certain crafted image, btrfs will trigger kernel BUG_ON() when trying to recover balance: kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:8956! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI CPU: 1 PID: 662 Comm: mount Not tainted 4.18.0-rc1-custom+ #10 RIP: 0010:walk_up_proc+0x336/0x480 [btrfs] RSP: 0018:ffffb53540c9b890 EFLAGS: 00010202 Call Trace: walk_up_tree+0x172/0x1f0 [btrfs] btrfs_drop_snapshot+0x3a4/0x830 [btrfs] merge_reloc_roots+0xe1/0x1d0 [btrfs] btrfs_recover_relocation+0x3ea/0x420 [btrfs] open_ctree+0x1af3/0x1dd0 [btrfs] btrfs_mount_root+0x66b/0x740 [btrfs] mount_fs+0x3b/0x16a vfs_kern_mount.part.9+0x54/0x140 btrfs_mount+0x16d/0x890 [btrfs] mount_fs+0x3b/0x16a vfs_kern_mount.part.9+0x54/0x140 do_mount+0x1fd/0xda0 ksys_mount+0xba/0xd0 __x64_sys_mount+0x21/0x30 do_syscall_64+0x60/0x210 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [CAUSE] Extent tree corruption. In this particular case, reloc tree root's owner is DATA_RELOC_TREE (should be TREE_RELOC), thus its backref is corrupted and we failed the owner check in walk_up_tree(). [FIX] It's pretty hard to take care of every extent tree corruption, but at least we can remove such BUG_ON() and exit more gracefully. And since in this particular image, DATA_RELOC_TREE and TREE_RELOC share the same root (which is obviously invalid), we needs to make __del_reloc_root() more robust to detect such invalid sharing to avoid possible NULL dereference as root->node can be NULL in this case. Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200411Reported-by: Xu Wen <wen.xu@gatech.edu> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
zhong jiang authored
btrfs_pin_log_trans defines the variable "ret" for return value, but it is not modified after initialization. Further, I find that none of the callers do handles the return value, so it is safe to drop the unneeded "ret" and make it return void. Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
zhong jiang authored
btrfs_free_reserved_bytes uses the variable "ret" for return value, but it is not modified after initialzation. Further, I find that any of the callers do not handle the return value, so it is safe to drop the unneeded "ret" and return void. There are no callees that would need the function to handle or pass the value either. Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [ update changelog ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Liu Bo authored
@path is always NULL when it comes to the if branch. Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Qu Wenruo authored
[BUG] In the following case, rescan won't zero out the number of qgroup 1/0: $ mkfs.btrfs -fq $DEV $ mount $DEV /mnt $ btrfs quota enable /mnt $ btrfs qgroup create 1/0 /mnt $ btrfs sub create /mnt/sub $ btrfs qgroup assign 0/257 1/0 /mnt $ dd if=/dev/urandom of=/mnt/sub/file bs=1k count=1000 $ btrfs sub snap /mnt/sub /mnt/snap $ btrfs quota rescan -w /mnt $ btrfs qgroup show -pcre /mnt qgroupid rfer excl max_rfer max_excl parent child -------- ---- ---- -------- -------- ------ ----- 0/5 16.00KiB 16.00KiB none none --- --- 0/257 1016.00KiB 16.00KiB none none 1/0 --- 0/258 1016.00KiB 16.00KiB none none --- --- 1/0 1016.00KiB 16.00KiB none none --- 0/257 So far so good, but: $ btrfs qgroup remove 0/257 1/0 /mnt WARNING: quotas may be inconsistent, rescan needed $ btrfs quota rescan -w /mnt $ btrfs qgroup show -pcre /mnt qgoupid rfer excl max_rfer max_excl parent child -------- ---- ---- -------- -------- ------ ----- 0/5 16.00KiB 16.00KiB none none --- --- 0/257 1016.00KiB 16.00KiB none none --- --- 0/258 1016.00KiB 16.00KiB none none --- --- 1/0 1016.00KiB 16.00KiB none none --- --- ^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^ not cleared [CAUSE] Before rescan we call qgroup_rescan_zero_tracking() to zero out all qgroups' accounting numbers. However we don't mark all qgroups dirty, but rely on rescan to do so. If we have any high level qgroup without children, it won't be marked dirty during rescan, since we cannot reach that qgroup. This will cause QGROUP_INFO items of childless qgroups never get updated in the quota tree, thus their numbers will stay the same in "btrfs qgroup show" output. [FIX] Just mark all qgroups dirty in qgroup_rescan_zero_tracking(), so even if we have childless qgroups, their QGROUP_INFO items will still get updated during rescan. Reported-by: Misono Tomohiro <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Misono Tomohiro <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Misono Tomohiro <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Omar Sandoval authored
struct scrub_ctx has an ->is_dev_replace member, so there's no point in passing around is_dev_replace where sctx is available. Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Anand Jain authored
When the replace is running the fs_devices::num_devices also includes the replaced device, however in some operations like device delete and balance it needs the actual num_devices without the repalced devices. The function btrfs_num_devices() just provides that. And here is a scenario how balance and repalce items could co-exist: Consider balance is started and paused, now start the replace followed by a unmount or system power-cycle. During following mount, the open_ctree() first restarts the balance so it must check for the device replace otherwise our num_devices calculation will be wrong. Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [ update changelog ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Anand Jain authored
In preparation to add helper function to deduce the num_devices with replace running, use assert instead of BUG_ON or WARN_ON. The number of devices would not normally drop to 0 due to other checks so the assert is sufficient. Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [ update changelog, adjust the assert condition ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
zhong jiang authored
Kfree has taken the NULL pointer into account. So remove the check before kfree. The issue is detected with the help of Coccinelle. Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Liu Bo authored
As we're going to return right after the call, it's not necessary to get update the new write_lock_level from unlock_up. Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Misono Tomohiro authored
There are two members in struct btrfs_root which indicate root's objectid: objectid and root_key.objectid. They are both set to the same value in __setup_root(): static void __setup_root(struct btrfs_root *root, struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 objectid) { ... root->objectid = objectid; ... root->root_key.objectid = objecitd; ... } and not changed to other value after initialization. grep in btrfs directory shows both are used in many places: $ grep -rI "root->root_key.objectid" | wc -l 133 $ grep -rI "root->objectid" | wc -l 55 (4.17, inc. some noise) It is confusing to have two similar variable names and it seems that there is no rule about which should be used in a certain case. Since ->root_key itself is needed for tree reloc tree, let's remove 'objecitd' member and unify code to use ->root_key.objectid in all places. Signed-off-by: Misono Tomohiro <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Lu Fengqi authored
Since ret must be 0 here, don't have to return. No functional change and code readability is not hurt. Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Lu Fengqi authored
All callers pass the root tree of dir, we can push that down to the function itself. Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Lu Fengqi authored
Using true and false here is closer to the expected semantic than using 0 and 1. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
Lu Fengqi authored
Only when send_in_progress, we have to do something different such as btrfs_warn() and return -EPERM. Therefore, we could check send_in_progress first and process error handling, after the root_item_lock has been got. Just for better readability. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-