- 29 Apr, 2015 35 commits
-
-
Emmanuel Grumbach authored
When we use an external buffer, it is allocated from the t DRAM and can be as big as 64MB. This buffer is huge and might not be needed for the specific issue being chased. Especially if lots of dumps are going to be created. Allow to limit the size of the buffer in the configuration. Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
Eliad Peller authored
qos_seq points (to a struct) inside the command response data. Make sure to free the response only after qos_seq is not needed anymore. type=bugfix bug=not-tracked fixes=I78c07110b59dcd389207bd2b168b0a2760839fe0 Change-Id: I619ce2c17e064dc98c7be9abc1e23175fdc8fb9a Reported-by: Heng Luo <heng.luo@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Eliad Peller <eliadx.peller@intel.com> Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.rds.intel.com/r/55381Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Tested-by: IWL Jenkins Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
Luciano Coelho authored
With just a few differences left in the UMAC scan functions now, we can merge them into one, taking care of the small difference according to the total number of iterations required. Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
Luciano Coelho authored
In theory, LMAC scans can handle a 32-bit delay, but since waiting for over 18 hours to start the scan is a bit silly and to keep it aligned with UMAC scans (which only support 16-bit delays), trim it down to 16-bits. This makes the LMAC vs. UMAC and the UMAC reg scan vs. UMAC sched scan code more similar. Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
Luciano Coelho authored
The last remaining difference between the regular scan and scheduled scan flows for LMAC is the FW capabilities check for EBS scans. Merge these checks into a new function and then combine the LMAC scan functions into a single one. Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
Luciano Coelho authored
As another step towards combining the scan and sched scan functions, add parameters that tell the scan function how many iterations we want (i.e. 1 for normal scan, more for scheduled scan) and that set the full scan multiplier (only meaningful for LMAC). Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
Luciano Coelho authored
The probe request to be added to both LMAC and UMAC scan commands are identical, so move the generation out of the LMAC/UMAC-specific code. Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
Luciano Coelho authored
To make things clearer, rename the iwl_mvm_scan_calc_params() function to iwl_mvm_calc_dwell() and make it calculate and fill in only dwell-related parameters. Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
Luciano Coelho authored
Now that both scheduled scan and regular scan SSID populating functions do the same thing, they can be combined into a single function. Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
Luciano Coelho authored
The firmware inverts the order of the SSIDs sent out in probe requests (for some reason). For regular scans, we've been passing the SSIDs in the opposite order so they go out in the order we want. With scheduled scans, we were not doing that, so they were sent out in reverse order of priority. Fix that by using the reverse order when populating the SSIDs array for scheduled scans as well. Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
Luciano Coelho authored
The only difference in the ssid_bitmap between LMAC and UMAC scans is that in LMAC bits 1 to 20 are used, while in UMAC bits 0 to 19 are used (*sigh*). So we can combine the bitmap creation into a single function and simply shift left if LMAC is used. Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
Luciano Coelho authored
Many parameters are common for all scans. Instead of parsing the cfg80211 scan and sched scan requests differently in each flow, move the parsing outside of the API/scan-type specific functions. In this way, we only need to differentiate between scan types once. Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
Luciano Coelho authored
Similarly to the regular scan patch, a lot of the UMAC and LMAC sched scan code is also almost identical. Grab the low hanging fruits by combining the obvious parts. Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
Luciano Coelho authored
A lot of the UMAC and LMAC scan code is almost identical. Grab the low hanging fruits by combining the obvious parts. Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
Emmanuel Grumbach authored
The lists of the devices supported by either MVM or DVM firmwares was incomplete. Point to https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/users/drivers/iwlwifi#firmware instead of maintaining the lists. Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
Arik Nemtsov authored
Usually during HW recovery the state of all active interfaces is cleaned up during drv_start(). There's a special case where a HW restart is requested when an interface is going down. In this case the iface-iterator won't see this interface and we won't clean it. This has bad consequences once the interface is legitimately brought up again. Signed-off-by: Arik Nemtsov <arikx.nemtsov@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
Luciano Coelho authored
Instead of repeating the same code in 4 different places, combine the comparisons into a new function. Additionally, this change fixes UMAC scans where the RRM IEs were not taken into consideration when calculating the IE length. Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
Luciano Coelho authored
We have a function (iwl_mvm_scan_size()) that can calculate the scan size for both UMAC and LMAC scans. Use that function instead of calculating manually for LMAC scan and sched scan. Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
Emmanuel Grumbach authored
We don't support -9.ucode so, all the released firmwares support scheduled scan properly. Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
Luciano Coelho authored
Remove unused struct iwl_scan_offload_req and enum iwl_scan_offload_flags which are not used anymore. Rename iwl_scan_offload_schedule to iwl_scan_schedule_lmac to make it clear that this is for LMAC only. And fix a small typo. Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
Liad Kaufman authored
Previously there was a check that compared window->average_tpt to some value, and if it was different - it set it to that value. However, this value was already calculated and set in _rs_collect_tx_data(), so the entire check is unneeded. Signed-off-by: Liad Kaufman <liad.kaufman@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
Liad Kaufman authored
This adds support for configuring and retrieving the FW monitor in MARBH mode. Signed-off-by: Liad Kaufman <liad.kaufman@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
Luciano Coelho authored
Net-detect scans were using the same type as sched scan, which was causing the driver to return -EBUSY and prevent the system from suspending if there was an ongoing scheduled scan. To avoid this, add a new type for net-detect and don't stop anything when it is requested, so that the existing scheduled scan will be resumed when the system wakes up. Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
Luciano Coelho authored
Move all the scan code that was in mac80211.c to scan.c where it belongs, leaving only the parts that are specific to mac80211 ops. Change some function definitions slightly to improve consistency. Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
Luciano Coelho authored
All scans are using the unified APIs now, so using "unified" in the symbols is useless and just make them much longer and the main difference between scans now is LMAC vs. UMAC. Remove "unified" from all relevant symbols. Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
Luciano Coelho authored
Instead of hardcoding the differences between UMAC scans and LMAC scans (which in this case is the number of simultaneous scans that can run), introduce a max_scans variable and stop scans of the other type (i.e. stop sched scan if regular scan is being attempted and vice-versa) if the number of running scans reached the maximum. Add a function that checks if the maximum number of scans was reached and stops the appropriate scan to make room for the new scan. Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
Luciano Coelho authored
If a new scan cannot be run for some reason, we shouldn't cancel other ongoing scans. Move the checks to before the code that cancels other scans. Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
Luciano Coelho authored
Now that we have separate flags for stopping scans, we don't need to wait for the scan stopped work to complete before starting the new scan. Previously we needed it because we had no way of distinguishing the scan that was being stopped from the scan that was currently running. With the new flags there won't be any confusions and we are able to handle the stop for the correct type of scan. Thus we can remove the iwl_mvm_cancel_scan_wait_notif() function. Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
Luciano Coelho authored
LMAC scans cannot handle more than one scan at a time, but UMAC scans can. To avoid confusion we should combine the states of these two types of scans. To do so, we need to support mutliple scans at the same time for UMAC. This commit changes the scan_status element from a single value to a bitmask of running scan types for LMAC. Later, we will modify UMAC scans to use the same state bitmask. Additionally, add stopping scan flags for scheduled and regular scans. This makes it easier to differentiate and handle stop requests triggered by the driver and spontaneous stops generated by the firmware. Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
Luciano Coelho authored
In some cases, max_out_time value is smaller than 200 and having the NL80211_SCAN_FLAG_LOW_PRIORITY flag was actually causing the max_out_time to be increased. To avoid that, set max_out_time to 200 only if it's greater than 200. Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Alexander Bondar <alexander.bondar@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
Luciano Coelho authored
Add scan parameters information to make it easier to debug scan dwell times and fragmentation. Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Alexander Bondar <alexander.bondar@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
Eyal Shapira authored
last_txrate_idx isn't used anymore and can be dropped as this info exists already somewhere else. Signed-off-by: Eyal Shapira <eyalx.shapira@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
Liad Kaufman authored
Same code appear a few lines later while the position has no effect on the actual flow. Signed-off-by: Liad Kaufman <liad.kaufman@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
Matti Gottlieb authored
When user space requests mac80211 to transmit a frame off channel, mac80211 notifies the driver, and the driver requests a time event from the ucode, and then transmits the frame. When the driver requests a time event, it can specify what is the allowed max delay for starting the time event. When the max delay is too big, this can cause a timeout in the user space, that is waiting for the frame to be transmitted. Currently the max delay is extremely long. Reduce the max delay for the AUX ROC time event that is sent to the ucode. Signed-off-by: Matti Gottlieb <matti.gottlieb@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
Emmanuel Grumbach authored
-
- 28 Apr, 2015 3 commits
-
-
Johannes Berg authored
During firmware restart, the quota command isn't calculated multiple times, but after the firmware restart it has to be sent, so force it. Otherwise the firmware crashes. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
Emmanuel Grumbach authored
I forgot to rename the CPTCFG_ prefix... Fixes: 484b3d13 ("iwlwifi: mvm: add debugfs entry with the number of net-detect scans") Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
Eran Harary authored
Our device needs two different firmwares: the INIT firmware and the operational (OPER) firmware. The first one is run when the driver loads and it returns calibrations results as well as the NVM. The second one implements the WiFi protocol. If the wlan interface is not brought up, the device is put to low power state: no firmware will be running. When the interface is brought up, we would run the OPER firmware only and reuse the results of the run of the INIT firmware when the driver was loaded. This is changing with this patch. We now run the INIT firmware every time mac80211 calls start(). The penalty for that is minimal since the INIT firwmare run fast. I now also avoid to power down the device between the INIT and OPER firmware on certains buses. The motivation for this change is that there are components on the device (MFUART) that are triggered by the INIT firmware and need the device to be powered up in order to keep running. Powering the device down between the INIT and OPER firmware would stop these components and prevent them from running again since they are triggered by the INIT firmware only. The new flow allows this and also allows to trigger these components again when the interface is brought up after it has been brought down. Signed-off-by: Eran Harary <eran.harary@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
- 20 Apr, 2015 1 commit
-
-
Liad Kaufman authored
In the case of a DMA mapping error on the last iteration of the loop of the allocation of memory of the FW monitor we indeed free the pages, but don't NULL out the page variable thus allowing for the possibility of setting the FW monitor variables with invalid data to use. Fixes: c2d20201 ("iwlwifi: pcie: add firmware monitor capabilities") Signed-off-by: Liad Kaufman <liad.kaufman@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
- 19 Apr, 2015 1 commit
-
-
Alexander Bondar authored
If for some reason statistics notification received from the firmware reports 0 in average beacon RSSI value, then skip it and avoid signal based decisions. Signed-off-by: Alexander Bondar <alexander.bondar@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-