- 12 Nov, 2013 40 commits
-
-
Miao Xie authored
It was very likely that there were lots of async delalloc pages in the filesystem, if we waited until all the pages were flushed, we would be blocked for a long time, and the performance would also drop down. Signed-off-by:
Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by:
Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by:
Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
Miao Xie authored
In shrink_delalloc(), what we need reclaim is the metadata space, so flushing pages by to_reclaim is not reasonable, it is very likely that the pages we flush are not enough. And then we had to invoke the flush function for several times, at the worst, we need call flush_space for several times. It wasted time. We improve this problem by converting the metadata space size we need reserve to the delalloc bytes, By this way, we can flush the pages by a reasonable number. (Now we use a fixed number to do conversion, it is not flexible, maybe we can find a good way to improve it in the future.) Signed-off-by:
-
Miao Xie authored
This patch picked up the code that was used to calculate the number of the items for which we need reserve space, and we will use it in the next patch. Signed-off-by:
-
Miao Xie authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Miao Xie authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Wang Shilong authored
We only allocate scrub workers if we pass all the necessary checks, for example, there are no operation in progress. Besides, move mutex lock protection outside of scrub_workers_get() /scrub_workers_put(). Signed-off-by:
Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
I hit this problem with my no holes patch and it made me realize what the problem was for bz 60834. If the first item in the leaf is an inline extent and we try to read anything starting from disk_bytenr onward we will read off the end of the leaf. So we need to check to see what it's type is, and if it's not REG we can just break out. This should fix this problem. Thanks, Signed-off-by:
-
Rashika authored
The function write_ctree_super() in disk-io.c uses variable ret to return the result of function write_all_supers(). Since, this variable serves no purpose, hence the patch removes it and returns the call of the called function. Reviewed-by:
Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
Rashika Kheria <rashika.kheria@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Dulshani Gunawardhana authored
Fix spacing issues detected via checkpatch.pl in accordance with the kernel style guidelines. Signed-off-by:
Dulshani Gunawardhana <dulshani.gunawardhana89@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Dulshani Gunawardhana authored
Replace kmalloc(size * nr, ) with kmalloc_array(nr, size), thus making it easier to check is that the calculation doesn't wrap or return a smaller allocation Signed-off-by:
-
Dulshani Gunawardhana authored
Enclose macros with complex values within parenthesis in accordance to checkpatch.pl. Signed-off-by:
-
Dulshani Gunawardhana authored
Use WARN_ON()'s return value in place of WARN_ON(1) for cleaner source code that outputs a more descriptive warnings. Also fix the styling warning of redundant braces that came up as a result of this fix. Signed-off-by:
-
Dulshani Gunawardhana authored
Remove redundant local zero structure, replacing it by the kernel's global ZERO_PAGE. Signed-off-by:
-
Dulshani Gunawardhana authored
Pack the structure btrfs_device in volumes.h to eliminate holes detected by pahole, thus reducing binary memory footprint. Signed-off-by:
-
Rashika authored
This patch replaces multiple atomic_inc() with atomic_add() in delayed-inode.c to reduce source code and have few instructions for compilation. Reviewed-by:
-
Rashika authored
The function free_root_pointers() in disk-io.h contains redundant code. Therefore, this patch adds a helper function free_root_extent_buffers() to free_root_pointers() to eliminate redundancy. Reviewed-by:
-
Liu Bo authored
Running balance and defrag concurrently can end up with a crash: kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4528! RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa01ac33b>] [<ffffffffa01ac33b>] btrfs_reloc_cow_block+ 0x1eb/0x230 [btrfs] Call Trace: [<ffffffffa01398c1>] ? update_ref_for_cow+0x241/0x380 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa0180bad>] ? copy_extent_buffer+0xad/0x110 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa0139da1>] __btrfs_cow_block+0x3a1/0x520 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa013a0b6>] btrfs_cow_block+0x116/0x1b0 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa013ddad>] btrfs_search_slot+0x43d/0x970 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa0153c57>] btrfs_lookup_file_extent+0x37/0x40 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa0172a5e>] __btrfs_drop_extents+0x11e/0xae0 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa013b3fd>] ? generic_bin_search.constprop.39+0x8d/0x1a0 [btrfs] [<ffffffff8117d14a>] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x1da/0x200 [<ffffffffa0138e7a>] ? btrfs_alloc_path+0x1a/0x20 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa0173ef0>] btrfs_drop_extents+0x60/0x90 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa016b24d>] relink_extent_backref+0x2ed/0x780 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa0162fe0>] ? btrfs_submit_bio_hook+0x1e0/0x1e0 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa01b8ed7>] ? iterate_inodes_from_logical+0x87/0xa0 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa016b909>] btrfs_finish_ordered_io+0x229/0xac0 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa016c3b5>] finish_ordered_fn+0x15/0x20 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa018cbe5>] worker_loop+0x125/0x4e0 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa018cac0>] ? btrfs_queue_worker+0x300/0x300 [btrfs] [<ffffffff81075ea0>] kthread+0xc0/0xd0 [<ffffffff81075de0>] ? insert_kthread_work+0x40/0x40 [<ffffffff8164796c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 [<ffffffff81075de0>] ? insert_kthread_work+0x40/0x40 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- It turns out to be that balance operation will bump root's @last_snapshot, which enables snapshot-aware defrag path, and backref walking stuff will find data reloc tree as refs' parent, and hit the BUG_ON() during COW. As data reloc tree's data is just for relocation purpose, and will be deleted right after relocation is done, it's unnecessary to walk those refs belonged to data reloc tree, it'd be better to skip them. Signed-off-by:
Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Liu Bo authored
If something wrong happens in write endio, running snapshot-aware defragment can end up with undefined results, maybe a crash, so we should avoid it. In order to share similar code, this also adds a helper to free the struct for snapshot-aware defrag. Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe David Borba Manana authored
If we get any error while doing a dir index/item lookup in the log tree, we were always unlinking the corresponding inode in the subvolume. It makes sense to unlink only if the lookup failed to find the dir index/item, which corresponds to NULL or -ENOENT, and not when other errors happen (like a transient -ENOMEM or -EIO). Signed-off-by:
Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe David Borba Manana authored
We were setting the csums search offset and length to the right values if the extent is compressed, but later on right before doing the csums lookup we were overriding these two parameters regardless of compression being set or not for the extent. Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe David Borba Manana authored
We were ignoring the name component of the dir_item. Both the name and data must fit within BTRFS_MAX_XATTR_SIZE(root). Signed-off-by:
-
Wang Shilong authored
Originally, we introduced scrub_super_lock to synchronize tree log code with scrubbing super. However we can replace scrub_super_lock with device_list_mutex, because writing super will hold this mutex, this will reduce an extra lock holding when writing supers in sync log code. Signed-off-by:
-
Wang Shilong authored
We define a 'int' to get extent's generation by mistake,fix it. Signed-off-by:
-
Miao Xie authored
After running space balance on a new fs, the fs check program outputed the following warning message: free space inode generation (0) did not match free space cache generation (20) Steps to reproduce: # mkfs.btrfs -f <dev> # mount <dev> <mnt> # btrfs balance start <mnt> # umount <mnt> # btrfs check <dev> It was because there was no data space after the space balance, and the free space write out task didn't try to allocate a new data chunk for the free space inode when doing the reservation. So the data space reservation failed, and in order to tell the free space loader that this free space inode could not be trusted, the generation of the free space inode wasn't updated. Then the check program found this problem and outputed the above message. But in fact, it is safe that we try to allocate a new data chunk when we find the data space is not enough. The patch fixes the above problem by this way. Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
I noticed with my horrible snapshot excercisor that we were taking forever to relocate the larger the file system got. This appeared to be because we were committing the transaction _constantly_. There were a few places where we do braindead things with metadata reservation, like start a transaction and then try to refill the block rsv, which not only keeps us from committing a transaction during the enospc stuff, but keeps us from doing some of the harder flushing work which will make us more likely to need to commit the transaction. We also were checking the block rsv and committing the transaction if the block rsv was below a certain threshold, but we were doing this in a place where we don't actually keep anything in the block rsv so this was always ending up false so we always committed the transaction in this case. I tested this to make sure it didn't break anything, but it takes about 10 hours to get the box to this state so I don't know how much of an impact it will really make. Thanks, Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
When using delalloc workers in a non-waiting way (like for enospc handling) we can end up not actually waiting for the dirty pages to be started if we have compression. We need to add an extra filemap flush to make sure any async extents that have started are actually moved along before returning. Thanks, Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
A user reported a list corruption warning from btrfs_remove_ordered_extent, it is because we aren't taking the ordered_root_lock when we remove the inode from the ordered operations list. Thanks, Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
This is just the write path, the only reason we start a transaction is so we can check cross references, we don't make any actual changes, so there is no reason to abort the transaction if we fail. Thanks, Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
We can just return an error and we'll bail out properly. We still want to catch this case to make sure we don't have a bug somewhere, so just warn if this pops up. Thanks, Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
I noticed that if the free space cache has an error writing out it's data it won't actually error out, it will just carry on. This is because it doesn't check the return value of btrfs_wait_ordered_range, which didn't actually return anything. So fix this in order to keep us from making free space cache look valid when it really isnt. Thanks, Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
Apparently we don't actually close the files until we return to userspace, so stop using vfs_read in send. This is actually better for us since we can avoid all the extra logic of holding the file we're sending open and making sure to clean it up. This will fix people who have been hitting too many files open errors when trying to send. Thanks, Signed-off-by:
-
Stefan Behrens authored
In mixed-mode, when a data-block was later reused for metadata, a warning was printed. This condition is now filtered out and the warning is eliminated in this case. Signed-off-by:
Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by:
-
Stefan Behrens authored
Yet another cleanup patch broke code for which no xfstest exists. Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe David Borba Manana authored
Instead of doing another extent tree search if the first search failed to find a metadata item, check if the previous item in the leaf is an extent item and use it if it is, otherwise do the second tree search for an extent item. Signed-off-by:
-
Jeff Mahoney authored
When debugging ENOSPC issues, it's nice to be able to see which reservations failed as well as the ones which succeeded. Signed-off-by:
Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Zach Brown authored
fs/btrfs/compat.h only contained trivial macro wrappers of drop_nlink() and inc_nlink(). This doesn't belong in mainline. Signed-off-by:
-
Zach Brown authored
move_pages() has an inefficient backwards byte copy of regions of two different pages. They're different pages so the regions won't overlap and it could use memcpy(). At that point, though, move_pages() would be a slightly dimmer re-implementation of copy_pages() that lacked the test for overlapping page regions. So remove move_pages() and just call copy_pages(). Signed-off-by:
-
Zach Brown authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe David Borba Manana authored
When a directory has a default ACL and a subdirectory is created under that directory, btrfs_init_acl() is called when the subdirectory's inode is created to initialize the inode's ACL (inherited from the parent directory) but it was clearing the ACL from the inode after setting it if posix_acl_create() returned success, instead of clearing it only if it returned an error. To reproduce this issue: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/loop0 $ mount /dev/loop0 /mnt $ mkdir /mnt/acl $ setfacl -d --set u::rwx,g::rwx,o::- /mnt/acl $ getfacl /mnt/acl user::rwx group::rwx other::r-x default:user::rwx default:group::rwx default:other::--- $ mkdir /mnt/acl/dir1 $ getfacl /mnt/acl/dir1 user::rwx group::rwx other::--- After unmounting and mounting again the filesystem, fgetacl returned the expected ACL: $ umount /mnt/acl $ mount /dev/loop0 /mnt $ getfacl /mnt/acl/dir1 user::rwx group::rwx other::--- default:user::rwx default:group::rwx default:other::--- Meaning that the underlying xattr was persisted. Reported-by:
Giuseppe Fierro <giuseppe@fierro.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Stefan Behrens authored
Due to an off-by-one error, it is possible to reproduce a bug when the inode cache is used. The same inode number is assigned twice, the second time this leads to an EEXIST in btrfs_insert_empty_items(). The issue can happen when a file is removed right after a subvolume is created and then a new inode number is created before the inodes in free_inode_pinned are processed. unlink() calls btrfs_return_ino() which calls start_caching() in this case which adds [highest_ino + 1, BTRFS_LAST_FREE_OBJECTID] by searching for the highest inode (which already cannot find the unlinked one anymore in btrfs_find_free_objectid()). So if this unlinked inode's number is equal to the highest_ino + 1 (or >= this value instead of > this value which was the off-by-one error), we mustn't add the inode number to free_ino_pinned (caching_thread() does it right). In this case we need to try directly to add the number to the inode_cache which will fail in this case. When this inode number is allocated while it is still in free_ino_pinned, it is allocated and still added to the free inode cache when the pinned inodes are processed, thus one of the following inode number allocations will get an inode that is already in use and fail with EEXIST in btrfs_insert_empty_items(). One example which was created with the reproducer below: Create a snapshot, work in the newly created snapshot for the rest. In unlink(inode 34284) call btrfs_return_ino() which calls start_caching(). start_caching() calls add_free_space [34284, 18446744073709517077]. In btrfs_return_ino(), call start_caching pinned [34284, 1] which is wrong. mkdir() call btrfs_find_ino_for_alloc() which returns the number 34284. btrfs_unpin_free_ino calls add_free_space [34284, 1]. mkdir() call btrfs_find_ino_for_alloc() which returns the number 34284. EEXIST when the new inode is inserted. One possible reproducer is this one: #!/bin/sh # preparation TEST_DEV=/dev/sdc1 TEST_MNT=/mnt umount ${TEST_MNT} 2>/dev/null || true mkfs.btrfs -f ${TEST_DEV} mount ${TEST_DEV} ${TEST_MNT} -o \ rw,relatime,compress=lzo,space_cache,inode_cache btrfs subv create ${TEST_MNT}/s1 for i in `seq 34027`; do touch ${TEST_MNT}/s1/${i}; done btrfs subv snap ${TEST_MNT}/s1 ${TEST_MNT}/s2 FILENAME=`find ${TEST_MNT}/s1/ -inum 4085 | sed 's|^.*/\([^/]*\)$|\1|'` rm ${TEST_MNT}/s2/$FILENAME touch ${TEST_MNT}/s2/$FILENAME # the following steps can be repeated to reproduce the issue again and again [ -e ${TEST_MNT}/s3 ] && btrfs subv del ${TEST_MNT}/s3 btrfs subv snap ${TEST_MNT}/s2 ${TEST_MNT}/s3 rm ${TEST_MNT}/s3/$FILENAME touch ${TEST_MNT}/s3/$FILENAME ls -alFi ${TEST_MNT}/s?/$FILENAME touch ${TEST_MNT}/s3/_1 || logger FAILED ls -alFi ${TEST_MNT}/s?/_1 touch ${TEST_MNT}/s3/_2 || logger FAILED ls -alFi ${TEST_MNT}/s?/_2 touch ${TEST_MNT}/s3/__1 || logger FAILED ls -alFi ${TEST_MNT}/s?/__1 touch ${TEST_MNT}/s3/__2 || logger FAILED ls -alFi ${TEST_MNT}/s?/__2 # if the above is not enough, add the following loop: for i in `seq 3 9`; do touch ${TEST_MNT}/s3/__${i} || logger FAILED; done #for i in `seq 3 34027`; do touch ${TEST_MNT}/s3/__${i} || logger FAILED; done # one of the touch(1) calls in s3 fail due to EEXIST because the inode is # already in use that btrfs_find_ino_for_alloc() returns. Signed-off-by:Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net> Signed-off-by:
-
