1. 31 Aug, 2017 2 commits
    • Paolo Valente's avatar
      block, bfq: remove direct switch to an entity in higher class · a02195ce
      Paolo Valente authored
      If the function bfq_update_next_in_service is invoked as a consequence
      of the activation or requeueing of an entity, say E, and finds out
      that E belongs to a higher-priority class than that of the current
      next-in-service entity, then it sets next_in_service directly to
      E. But this may lead to anomalous schedules, because E may happen not
      be eligible for service, because its virtual start time is higher than
      the system virtual time for its service tree.
      
      This commit addresses this issue by simply removing this direct
      switch.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarPaolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
      Tested-by: default avatarLee Tibbert <lee.tibbert@gmail.com>
      Tested-by: default avatarOleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
      a02195ce
    • Paolo Valente's avatar
      block, bfq: make lookup_next_entity push up vtime on expirations · 80294c3b
      Paolo Valente authored
      To provide a very smooth service, bfq starts to serve a bfq_queue
      only if the queue is 'eligible', i.e., if the same queue would
      have started to be served in the ideal, perfectly fair system that
      bfq simulates internally. This is obtained by associating each
      queue with a virtual start time, and by computing a special system
      virtual time quantity: a queue is eligible only if the system
      virtual time has reached the virtual start time of the
      queue. Finally, bfq guarantees that, when a new queue must be set
      in service, there is always at least one eligible entity for each
      active parent entity in the scheduler. To provide this guarantee,
      the function __bfq_lookup_next_entity pushes up, for each parent
      entity on which it is invoked, the system virtual time to the
      minimum among the virtual start times of the entities in the
      active tree for the parent entity (more precisely, the push up
      occurs if the system virtual time happens to be lower than all
      such virtual start times).
      
      There is however a circumstance in which __bfq_lookup_next_entity
      cannot push up the system virtual time for a parent entity, even
      if the system virtual time is lower than the virtual start times
      of all the child entities in the active tree. It happens if one of
      the child entities is in service. In fact, in such a case, there
      is already an eligible entity, the in-service one, even if it may
      not be not present in the active tree (because in-service entities
      may be removed from the active tree).
      
      Unfortunately, in the last re-design of the
      hierarchical-scheduling engine, the reset of the pointer to the
      in-service entity for a given parent entity--reset to be done as a
      consequence of the expiration of the in-service entity--always
      happens after the function __bfq_lookup_next_entity has been
      invoked. This causes the function to think that there is still an
      entity in service for the parent entity, and then that the system
      virtual time cannot be pushed up, even if actually such a
      no-more-in-service entity has already been properly reinserted
      into the active tree (or in some other tree if no more
      active). Yet, the system virtual time *had* to be pushed up, to be
      ready to correctly choose the next queue to serve. Because of the
      lack of this push up, bfq may wrongly set in service a queue that
      had been speculatively pre-computed as the possible
      next-in-service queue, but that would no more be the one to serve
      after the expiration and the reinsertion into the active trees of
      the previously in-service entities.
      
      This commit addresses this issue by making
      __bfq_lookup_next_entity properly push up the system virtual time
      if an expiration is occurring.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarPaolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
      Tested-by: default avatarLee Tibbert <lee.tibbert@gmail.com>
      Tested-by: default avatarOleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
      80294c3b
  2. 29 Aug, 2017 6 commits
  3. 28 Aug, 2017 32 commits