If the current P-state selection algorithm is set to "performance"
in intel_pstate_set_policy(), the limits may be initialized from
scratch, but only if no_turbo is not set and the maximum frequency
allowed for the given CPU (i.e. the policy object representing it)
is at least equal to the max frequency supported by the CPU.  In all
of the other cases, the limits will not be updated.

For example, the following can happen:

 # cat intel_pstate/status
 active
 # echo performance > cpufreq/policy0/scaling_governor
 # cat intel_pstate/min_perf_pct
 100
 # echo 94 > intel_pstate/min_perf_pct
 # cat intel_pstate/min_perf_pct
 100
 # cat cpufreq/policy0/scaling_max_freq
 3100000
 echo 3000000 > cpufreq/policy0/scaling_max_freq
 # cat intel_pstate/min_perf_pct
 94
 # echo 95 > intel_pstate/min_perf_pct
 # cat intel_pstate/min_perf_pct
 95

That is confusing for two reasons.  First, the initial attempt to
change min_perf_pct to 94 seems to have no effect, even though
setting the global limits should always work.  Second, after
changing scaling_max_freq for policy0 the global min_perf_pct
attribute shows 94, even though it should have not been affected
by that operation in principle.

Moreover, the final attempt to change min_perf_pct to 95 worked
as expected, because scaling_max_freq for the only policy with
scaling_governor equal to "performance" was different from the
maximum at that time.

To make all that confusion go away, modify intel_pstate_set_policy()
so that it doesn't reinitialize the limits at all.

At the same time, change intel_pstate_set_performance_limits() to
set min_sysfs_pct to 100 in the "performance" limits set so that
switching the P-state selection algorithm to "performance" causes
intel_pstate/min_perf_pct in sysfs to go to 100 (or whatever value
min_sysfs_pct in the "performance" limits is set to later).

That requires per-CPU limits to be initialized explicitly rather
than by copying the global limits to avoid setting min_sysfs_pct
in the per-CPU limits to 100.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The code added to intel_pstate_verify_policy() by commit 1443ebba
(cpufreq: intel_pstate: Fix sysfs limits enforcement for performance
policy) should use perf_limits instead of limits, because otherwise
setting global limits via sysfs may affect policies inconsistently.

For example, in the sequence of shell commands below, the
scaling_min_freq attribute for policy1 and policy2 should be
affected in the same way, because scaling_governor is set in
the same way for both of them:

 # cat cpufreq/policy1/scaling_governor
 powersave
 # cat cpufreq/policy2/scaling_governor
 powersave
 # echo performance > cpufreq/policy0/scaling_governor
 # echo 94 > intel_pstate/min_perf_pct
 # cat cpufreq/policy0/scaling_min_freq
 2914000
 # cat cpufreq/policy1/scaling_min_freq
 2914000
 # cat cpufreq/policy2/scaling_min_freq
 800000

The are affected differently, because intel_pstate_verify_policy()
is invoked with limits set to &performance_limits (left behind by
policy0) for policy1 and with limits set to &powersave_limits (left
behind by policy1) for policy2.  Since perf_limits is set to the
set of limits matching the policy being updated, using it instead
of limits fixes the inconsistency.

Fixes: 1443ebba (cpufreq: intel_pstate: Fix sysfs limits enforcement for performance policy)
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Commit 111b8b3f (cpufreq: intel_pstate: Always keep all
limits settings in sync) changed intel_pstate to invoke
cpufreq_update_policy() for every registered CPU on global sysfs
attributes updates, but that led to undesirable effects in the
active mode if the "performance" P-state selection algorithm is
configufred for one CPU and the "powersave" one is chosen for
all of the other CPUs.

Namely, in that case, the following is possible:

 # cd /sys/devices/system/cpu/
 # cat intel_pstate/max_perf_pct
 100
 # cat intel_pstate/min_perf_pct
 26
 # echo performance > cpufreq/policy0/scaling_governor
 # cat intel_pstate/max_perf_pct
 100
 # cat intel_pstate/min_perf_pct
 100
 # echo 94 > intel_pstate/min_perf_pct
 # cat intel_pstate/min_perf_pct
 26

The reason why this happens is because intel_pstate attempts to
maintain two sets of global limits in the active mode, one for
the "performance" P-state selection algorithm and one for the
"powersave"  P-state selection algorithm, but the P-state selection
algorithms are set per policy, so the global limits cannot reflect
all of them at the same time if they are different for different
policies.

In the particular situation above, the attempt to change
min_perf_pct to 94 caused cpufreq_update_policy() to be run
for a CPU with the "powersave"  P-state selection algorithm
and intel_pstate_set_policy() called by it silently switched the
global limits to the "powersave" set which finally was reflected
by the sysfs interface.

To prevent that from happening, modify intel_pstate_update_policies()
to always switch back to the set of limits that was used right before
it has been invoked.

Fixes: 111b8b3f (cpufreq: intel_pstate: Always keep all limits settings in sync)
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Add the "cpufreq.off=1" cmdline option.

At boot-time, this allows a user to request CONFIG_CPU_FREQ=n
behavior from a kernel built with CONFIG_CPU_FREQ=y.

This is analogous to the existing "cpuidle.off=1" option
and CONFIG_CPU_IDLE=y

This capability is valuable when we need to debug end-user
issues in the BIOS or in Linux.  It is also convenient
for enabling comparisons, which may otherwise require a new kernel,
or help from BIOS SETUP, which may be buggy or unavailable.
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

In the passive mode the cpu_frequency trace event is already
triggered by the cpufreq core or by scaling governors, so
intel_pstate should not trigger it once again for the same
P-state updates.

In addition to that, the frequency returned by
intel_cpufreq_fast_switch() and passed via freqs.new from
intel_cpufreq_target() to cpufreq_freq_transition_end() should
reflect the P-state actually set, so make that happen.

Fixes: 001c76f0 (cpufreq: intel_pstate: Generic governors support)
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The intel_pstate_update_perf_limits() called from
intel_cpufreq_verify_policy() may cause global P-state limits
to change which is generally confusing and unnecessary.

In the passive mode the global limits are only applied to the
frequency selected by the scaling governor (they are not taken
into account by governors when making decisions anyway), so making
them follow the per-policy limits serves no purpose and may go
against user expectations (as it generally causes the global
attributes in sysfs to change even though they have not been
written to in some cases).

Fix that by dropping the intel_pstate_update_perf_limits()
invocation from intel_cpufreq_verify_policy() (which also
reduces the code size by a few lines).

This change does not affect the per-CPU limits case, because those
limits allow any P-state to be set by default in the passive mode
and it removes the only piece of code updating them in that mode,
so the per-policy settings will be the only ones taken into account
in that case as expected.

Fixes: 001c76f0 (cpufreq: intel_pstate: Generic governors support)
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Using performance_limits in the passive mode doesn't make
sense, because in that mode the global limits are applied to the
frequency selected by the scaling governor.

The maximum and minimum P-state limits in performance_limits are both
set to 100 percent which will put all CPUs into the turbo range
regardless of what governor is used and what frequencies are
selected by it (that is particularly undesirable on CPUs with the
generic powersave governor attached).

For this reason, make intel_pstate_register_driver() always point
limits to powersave_limits in the passive mode.

Fixes: 001c76f0 (cpufreq: intel_pstate: Generic governors support)
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

There is a problem with intel_pstate operation mode switching
introduced by commit fb1fe104 (cpufreq: intel_pstate: Operation
mode control from sysfs), because the global sysfs limits are
preserved across operation modes while per-policy limits are
reinitialized from scratch on a mode switch and both sets of limits
may get out of sync this way.

Fix that by always reinitializing the global limits upon the
registration of the driver.

Fixes: fb1fe104 (cpufreq: intel_pstate: Operation mode control from sysfs)
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>

This snip code is not needed anymore since its user
get_hard_smp_processor_id() has been removed.
Signed-off-by: Tang Yuantian <yuantian.tang@nxp.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Add maintainer information for bmips-cpufreq.c.
Signed-off-by: Markus Mayer <mmayer@broadcom.com>
Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Without the Kconfig dependency, we can get this warning:

warning: ACPI_CPPC_CPUFREQ selects ACPI_CPPC_LIB which has unmet direct dependencies (ACPI && ACPI_PROCESSOR)

Fixes: 5477fb3b (ACPI / CPPC: Add a CPUFreq driver for use with CPPC)
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is:

drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm:config ARM_TI_CPUFREQ
drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm:    bool "Texas Instruments CPUFreq support"

...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone.

Lets remove the couple traces of modular infrastructure use, so that
when reading the driver there is no doubt it is builtin-only.

Since module_init translates to device_initcall in the non-modular
case, the init ordering remains unchanged with this commit.

We also delete the MODULE_LICENSE tag etc. since all that information
is already contained at the top of the file in the comments.
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

If new_policy is set in cpufreq_online(), the policy object has just
been created and its real_cpus mask has been zeroed on allocation,
and the driver's ->init() callback should not touch it.

It doesn't need to be cleared again, so don't do that.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

Some TI platforms, specifically those in the am33xx, am43xx, dra7xx, and
am57xx families of SoCs can make use of the ti-cpufreq driver to
selectively enable OPPs based on the exact configuration in use. The
ti-cpufreq is given the responsibility of creating the cpufreq-dt
platform device when the driver is in use so drop am33xx and dra7xx
from the cpufreq-dt-platdev driver so it is not created twice.
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Some TI SoCs, like those in the AM335x, AM437x, DRA7x, and AM57x families,
have different OPPs available for the MPU depending on which specific
variant of the SoC is in use. This can be determined through use of the
revision and an eFuse register present in the silicon. Introduce a
ti-cpufreq driver that can read the aformentioned values and provide
them as version matching data to the opp framework. Through this the
opp-supported-hw dt binding that is part of the operating-points-v2
table can be used to indicate availability of OPPs for each device.

This driver also creates the "cpufreq-dt" platform_device after passing
the version matching data to the OPP framework so that the cpufreq-dt
handles the actual cpufreq implementation. Even without the necessary
data to pass the version matching data the driver will still create this
device to maintain backwards compatibility with operating-points v1
tables.
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Add the device tree bindings document for the TI CPUFreq/OPP driver
on AM33xx, AM43xx, DRA7xx, and AM57xx SoCs. The operating-points-v2
binding allows us to provide an opp-supported-hw property for each OPP
to define when it is available. This driver is responsible for reading
and parsing registers to determine which OPPs can be selectively enabled
based on the specific SoC in use by matching against the opp-supported-hw
data.
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Rename _of_get_opp_desc_node to dev_pm_opp_of_get_opp_desc_node and add it
to include/linux/pm_opp.h to allow other drivers, such as platform OPP
and cpufreq drivers, to make use of it.
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Get the CPU clock's potential parent clocks from the clock interface
itself, rather than manually parsing the clocks property to find a
phandle, looking at the clock-names property of that, and assuming that
those are valid parent clocks for the cpu clock.

This is necessary now that the clocks are generated based on the clock
driver's knowledge of the chip rather than a fragile device-tree
description of the mux options.

We can now rely on the clock driver to ensure that the mux only exposes
options that are valid.  The cpufreq driver was currently being overly
conservative in some cases -- for example, the "min_cpufreq =
get_bus_freq()" restriction only applies to chips with erratum
A-004510, and whether the freq_mask used on p5020 is needed depends on
the actual frequencies of the PLLs (FWIW, p5040 has a similar
limitation but its .freq_mask was zero) -- and the frequency mask
mechanism made assumptions about particular parent clock indices that
are no longer valid.
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Tang Yuantian <yuantian.tang@nxp.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Add ARM64 config to Kconfig to enable CPU frequency feature on
NXP ARM64 SoCs.
Signed-off-by: Tang Yuantian <yuantian.tang@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The driver core clears the driver data to NULL after device_release
or on probe failure. Thus, it is not needed to manually clear the
device driver data to NULL.
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The "goto err_armclk;" error path already does a clk_put(s3c_freq->hclk);
so this is a double free.

Fixes: 34ee5507 ([CPUFREQ] Add S3C2416/S3C2450 cpufreq driver)
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Enable all applicable CPUfreq options.
Signed-off-by: Markus Mayer <mmayer@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Add the MIPS CPUfreq driver. This driver currently supports CPUfreq on
BMIPS5xxx-based SoCs.
Signed-off-by: Markus Mayer <mmayer@broadcom.com>
Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Turn on CPU_SUPPORTS_CPUFREQ and MIPS_EXTERNAL_TIMER for BMIPS.
Signed-off-by: Markus Mayer <mmayer@broadcom.com>
Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Ran "make savedefconfig" to bring bmips_stb_defconfig up to date.
Signed-off-by: Markus Mayer <mmayer@broadcom.com>
Reviewed-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Fixes the following sparse warning:

drivers/base/power/opp/core.c:49:18: warning:
 symbol '_find_opp_table_unlocked' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

- s/freqnency/frequency/
- s/accomodating/accommodating/
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Some Kabylake desktop processors may not reach max turbo when running in
HWP mode, even if running under sustained 100% utilization.

This occurs when the HWP.EPP (Energy Performance Preference) is set to
"balance_power" (0x80) -- the default on most systems.

It occurs because the platform BIOS may erroneously enable an
energy-efficiency setting -- MSR_IA32_POWER_CTL BIT-EE, which is not
recommended to be enabled on this SKU.

On the failing systems, this BIOS issue was not discovered when the
desktop motherboard was tested with Windows, because the BIOS also
neglects to provide the ACPI/CPPC table, that Windows requires to enable
HWP, and so Windows runs in legacy P-state mode, where this setting has
no effect.

Linux' intel_pstate driver does not require ACPI/CPPC to enable HWP, and
so it runs in HWP mode, exposing this incorrect BIOS configuration.

There are several ways to address this problem.

First, Linux can also run in legacy P-state mode on this system.
As intel_pstate is how Linux enables HWP, booting with
"intel_pstate=disable"
will run in acpi-cpufreq/ondemand legacy p-state mode.

Or second, the "performance" governor can be used with intel_pstate,
which will modify HWP.EPP to 0.

Or third, starting in 4.10, the
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy*/energy_performance_preference
attribute in can be updated from "balance_power" to "performance".

Or fourth, apply this patch, which fixes the erroneous setting of
MSR_IA32_POWER_CTL BIT_EE on this model, allowing the default
configuration to function as designed.
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Cc: 4.6+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.6+
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

When HWP is active, turbo activation ratio is not used to calculate max
non turbo ratio. But on these systems the max non turbo ratio is decided
by config TDP settings.

This change removes usage of MSR_TURBO_ACTIVATION_RATIO for HWP systems,
instead directly use TDP ratios, when more than one TDPs are available.
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Under HWP the performance limits are calculated using max_perf_pct
and min_perf_pct using possible performance, not available performance.
The available performance can be reduced by no_turbo setting. To make
compatible with legacy mode, use max/min performance percentage with
respect to available performance.
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

When turbo is not disabled by BIOS, but user disabled from intel P-State
sysfs and changes max/min using cpufreq sysfs, the resultant frequency
is lower than what user requested.

The reason for this, when the perf limits are calculated in set_policy()
callback, they are with reference to max cpu frequency (turbo frequency
), but when enforced in the intel_pstate_get_min_max() they are with
reference to max available performance as documented in the intel_pstate
documentation (in this case max non turbo P-State).

This needs similar change as done in intel_cpufreq_verify_policy() for
passive mode. Set policy->cpuinfo.max_freq based on the turbo status.
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Make it possible to change the operation mode of intel_pstate with
the help of a new sysfs attribute called "status".

There are three possible configurations that can be selected using
this attribute:

 "off"     - The driver is not in use at this time.
 "active"  - The driver works as a P-state governor (default).
 "passive" - The driver works as a regular cpufreq one and collaborates
             with the generic cpufreq governors (it sets P-states as
             requested by those governors).  [This is the same mode
             the driver can be started in by passing intel_pstate=passive
             in the kernel command line.]

The current setting is returned by reads from this attribute.  Writing
one of the above strings to it changes the operation mode as indicated
by that string, if possible.

If HW-managed P-states (HWP) feature is enabled, it is not possible
to change the driver's operation mode and attempts to write to this
attribute will fail.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Expose the intel_pstate's global sysfs attributes before registering
the driver to prepare for the addition of an attribute that also will
have to work if the driver is not registered.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Its not used anymore, remove it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

acpi_processor_ppc_notifier() can live without using CPUFREQ_START
(which is gonna be removed soon), as it is only used while setting
ignore_ppc to 0. This can be done with the help of "ignore_ppc < 0"
check alone. The notifier function anyway ignores all events except
CPUFREQ_ADJUST and dropping CPUFREQ_START wouldn't harm at all.

Once CPUFREQ_START event is removed from the cpufreq core,
acpi_processor_ppc_notifier() will get called only for CPUFREQ_NOTIFY or
CPUFREQ_ADJUST event. Drop the return statement from the first if block
to make sure we don't ignore any such events.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

In P8+, Workload Optimized Frequency(WOF) provides the capability to
boost the cpu frequency based on the utilization of the other cpus
running in the chip. The On-Chip-Controller(OCC) firmware will control
the achievability of these frequencies depending on the power headroom
available in the chip. Currently the ultra-turbo frequencies provided
by this feature are exported along with the turbo and sub-turbo
frequencies as scaling_available_frequencies. This patch will export
the ultra-turbo frequencies separately as scaling_boost_frequencies in
WOF enabled systems. This patch will add the boost sysfs file which
can be used to disable/enable ultra-turbo frequencies.
Signed-off-by: Shilpasri G Bhat <shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The cpufreq core has gone though lots of updates in recent times, but on
many occasions the documentation wasn't updated along with the code.
This patch tries to catchup the documentation with the code.

Also add Rafael and Viresh as the contributors to the documentation.

Based on a patch from Claudio Scordino.
Signed-off-by: Claudio Scordino <claudio@evidence.eu.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

This patch doesn't change the content of the documentation, but rather
reformat it to make it more readable.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>