The variable n is being assigned a value that is never read inside
an if statement block, the assignment is redundant and can be removed.
With this removed, n is only being used for a constant loop bounds
check, so replace n with that value instead and remove n completely.

Addresses-Coverity: ("Unused value")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190905152227.4610-1-colin.king@canonical.comSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Fixes a typo in the documentation.
Signed-off-by: Rohit Sarkar <rohitsarkar5398@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190905132219.GA1004@SARKARSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

time_t suffers from overflow problems and should not be used.

In exfat, it is currently used in two open-coded time64_to_tm()
implementations. Changes those to use the existing function instead.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190906150917.1025250-2-arnd@arndb.deSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

When CONFIG_VFAT_FS is disabled, the reference to CONFIG_FAT_DEFAULT_IOCHARSET
causes a link failure:

drivers/staging/exfat/exfat_super.c:46:41: error: use of undeclared identifier 'CONFIG_FAT_DEFAULT_IOCHARSET'
static char exfat_default_iocharset[] = CONFIG_FAT_DEFAULT_IOCHARSET;

I could not figure out why the correct code is commented
out, but using that fixes the problem.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190906150917.1025250-1-arnd@arndb.deSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

The commit 473d12f7

  ("iio: hid-sensor-attributes: Convert to use int_pow()")

converted to use generic int_pow() helper. Though, the generic one returns
64-bit value and, in cases when it is used as divisor, it compels 64-bit
division from compiler.

In order to fix this, introduce a temporary 32-bit variable to hold the result
of int_pow() and use it as divisor afterwards.

In couple of cases, replace int_pow() with a predefined unit factors for time
and frequency.

Fixes: 473d12f7 ("iio: hid-sensor-attributes: Convert to use int_pow()")
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190905112759.13035-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

As Christoph said [1], "I'd much prefer to just use
read_cache_page_gfp, and live with the fact that this
allocates bufferheads behind you for now.  I'll try to
speed up my attempts to get rid of the buffer heads on
the block device mapping instead. "

This simplifies the code a lot and a minor thing is
"no REQ_META (e.g. for blktrace) on metadata at all..."

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190903153704.GA2201@infradead.org/Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190904020912.63925-26-gaoxiang25@huawei.comSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

As Christoph said [1] [2], "Just use the slightly
more complicated 32-bit version everywhere so that
you have a single actually tested code path.
And then remove this helper. "

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190829102426.GE20598@infradead.org/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190902125320.GA16726@infradead.org/Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190904020912.63925-25-gaoxiang25@huawei.comSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

As Christoph said [1], "This seems to be your only direct
use of buffer heads, which while not deprecated are a bit
of an ugly step child.  So if you can easily avoid creating
a buffer_head dependency in a new filesystem I think you
should avoid it. "

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190902125109.GA9826@infradead.org/Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190904020912.63925-24-gaoxiang25@huawei.comSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Add prefix "erofs_" to these functions and print
sb->s_id as a prefix to erofs_{err, info} so that
the user knows which file system is affected.
Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190904020912.63925-23-gaoxiang25@huawei.comSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

As Christoph said [1], ".. and save one
level of indentation."

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190829102426.GE20598@infradead.org/Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190904020912.63925-22-gaoxiang25@huawei.comSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

As Christoph said [1],
"vm_map_ram is supposed to generally behave better.  So if
it doesn't please report that that to the arch maintainer
and linux-mm so that they can look into the issue.  Having
user make choices of deep down kernel internals is just
a horrible interface.

Please talk to maintainers of other bits of the kernel
if you see issues and / or need enhancements. "

Let's redo the previous conclusion and kill the vmap
approach.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190830165533.GA10909@infradead.org/Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190904020912.63925-21-gaoxiang25@huawei.comSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

As Christoph suggested [1], "Please just use plain kmalloc
everywhere and let the normal kernel error injection code
take care of injeting any errors."

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190829102426.GE20598@infradead.org/Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190904020912.63925-20-gaoxiang25@huawei.comSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Add erofs_ prefix to free_inode, alloc_inode, ...
Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190904020912.63925-19-gaoxiang25@huawei.comSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

As Christoph pointed out [1], "
Why is there __submit_bio which really just obsfucates
what is going on?  Also why is __submit_bio using
bio_set_op_attrs instead of opencode it as the comment
right next to it asks you to? "

Let's use submit_bio directly instead.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190830162812.GA10694@infradead.org/Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190904020912.63925-18-gaoxiang25@huawei.comSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

As Christoph pointed out [1],
"Why is there __erofs_get_meta_page with the two weird
booleans instead of a single erofs_get_meta_page that
gets and gfp_t for additional flags and an unsigned int
for additional bio op flags."

And since all callers can handle errors, let's kill
prio and nofail and erofs_get_inline_page() now.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190830162812.GA10694@infradead.org/Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190904020912.63925-17-gaoxiang25@huawei.comSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

As Christoph pointed out [1], "erofs_grab_bio tries to
handle a bio_alloc failure, except that the function will
not actually fail due the mempool backing it."

Sorry about useless code, fix it now and
localize erofs_grab_bio [2].

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190830162812.GA10694@infradead.org/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190902122016.GL15931@infradead.org/Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190904020912.63925-16-gaoxiang25@huawei.comSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

As Christoph said [1], "That is some very verbose
debug info.  We usually don't add that and let
people trace the function instead. "

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190829101545.GC20598@infradead.org/Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190904020912.63925-15-gaoxiang25@huawei.comSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

As Christoph pointed out [1], "Why is the variable name
for the on-disk subperblock layout? We usually still
calls this something with sb in the name, e.g. dsb.
for disksuper block. " Let's fix it.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190829101545.GC20598@infradead.org/Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190904020912.63925-14-gaoxiang25@huawei.comSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Fix as Christoph suggested [1] [2], "remove is_inode_fast_symlink
and just opencode it in the few places using it"

and
"Please just set the ops directly instead of obsfucating that in
a single caller, single line inline function.  And please set it
instead of the normal symlink iops in the same place where you
also set those."

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190830163910.GB29603@infradead.org/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190829102426.GE20598@infradead.org/Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190904020912.63925-13-gaoxiang25@huawei.comSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

As Christoph suggested [1], update them all.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190829102426.GE20598@infradead.org/Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190904020912.63925-12-gaoxiang25@huawei.comSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

As Christoph said [1] [2], update it now.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190902124521.GA22153@infradead.org/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190902120548.GB15931@infradead.org/Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190904020912.63925-11-gaoxiang25@huawei.comSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

As Christoph suggested [1], "Why is this called vnode instead
of inode?  That seems like a rather odd naming for a Linux
file system."

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190829101545.GC20598@infradead.org/Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190904020912.63925-10-gaoxiang25@huawei.comSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

As Christoph said [1] "having this function seems
entirely pointless", let's kill those.

filesystem                              function name
ext2,f2fs,ext4,isofs,squashfs,cifs,...  init_inodecache

In addition, add a necessary "rcu_barrier()" on exit_fs();

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190829101545.GC20598@infradead.org/Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190904020912.63925-9-gaoxiang25@huawei.comSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

updates inode naming
 - kill is_inode_layout_compression [1]
 - kill magic underscores [2] [3]
 - better naming for datamode & data_mapping_mode [3]
 - better naming erofs_inode_{compact, extended} [4]

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190829102426.GE20598@infradead.org/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190829102426.GE20598@infradead.org/
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190902122627.GN15931@infradead.org/
[4] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190902125438.GA17750@infradead.org/Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190904020912.63925-8-gaoxiang25@huawei.comSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

As Christoph said [1], "This is only cosmetic, why
not stick to feature_compat and feature_incompat?"

In my thought, requirements means "incompatible"
instead of "feature" though.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190902125109.GA9826@infradead.org/Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190904020912.63925-7-gaoxiang25@huawei.comSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

As Christoph said, "This looks like a really obsfucated
way to write:
	return datamode == EROFS_INODE_FLAT_COMPRESSION ||
		datamode == EROFS_INODE_FLAT_COMPRESSION_LEGACY; "

Although I had my own consideration, it's the right way for now.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190829095954.GB20598@infradead.org/Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190904020912.63925-6-gaoxiang25@huawei.comSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

As Christoph suggested "Please don't add __packed" [1],
remove all __packed except struct erofs_dirent here.

Note that all on-disk fields except struct erofs_dirent
(12 bytes with a 8-byte nid) in EROFS are naturally aligned.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190829095954.GB20598@infradead.org/Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190904020912.63925-5-gaoxiang25@huawei.comSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

As Christoph suggested [1], these macros are much
more readable as a function.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190829095954.GB20598@infradead.org/Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190904020912.63925-4-gaoxiang25@huawei.comSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

As Christoph suggested [1], on-disk format should have
explicitly assigned numbers.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190829095954.GB20598@infradead.org/Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190904020912.63925-3-gaoxiang25@huawei.comSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

As Christoph suggested [1], "Please remove all the byte offset comments.
that is something that can easily be checked with gdb or pahole."

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190829095954.GB20598@infradead.org/Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190904020912.63925-2-gaoxiang25@huawei.comSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Fix the following checkpatch warning:

"WARNING: void function return statements are not generally useful"
Signed-off-by: Leandro Ribeiro <leandrohr@riseup.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190904210631.13599-1-leandrohr@riseup.netSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Fix checkpath error "CHECK: Blank lines aren't necessary after an open
brace '{'"
in rtllib.h:482.
Signed-off-by: Beatriz Martins de Carvalho <martinsdecarvalhobeatriz@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190904210326.17983-1-martinsdecarvalhobeatriz@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Use kmemdup rather than duplicating its implementation
Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190905030047.88401-1-yuehaibing@huawei.comSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Remove including <linux/version.h> that don't need it.
Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190905025623.63210-1-yuehaibing@huawei.comSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Remove duplicated include.
Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190905025608.61884-1-yuehaibing@huawei.comSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

kfree has taken the null check in account. hence it is unnecessary to add the
null check before kfree the object. Just remove it.
Reported-by: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1567591408-24268-1-git-send-email-zhongjiang@huawei.comSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

These two error paths need to unlock before we can return.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190904095908.GA7007@mwandaSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

while filling the linux inode, using switch-case statement to check
the type of inode.
switch-case statement looks more clean here.
Signed-off-by: Pratik Shinde <pratikshinde320@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190830095615.10995-1-pratikshinde320@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Fixes checkpatch.pl warnings:

  CHECK: Comparison to NULL could be written "expr"
  CHECK: Comparison to NULL could be written "!expr"
Signed-off-by: Valentin Vidic <vvidic@valentin-vidic.from.hr>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190903205659.18856-1-vvidic@valentin-vidic.from.hrSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Use kzfree instead of memset() + kfree().
Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1567566079-7412-4-git-send-email-zhongjiang@huawei.comSigned-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>