- 11 Jul, 2011 2 commits
-
-
Josef Bacik authored
We have to do weird things when handling enospc in the transaction joining code. Because we've already joined the transaction we cannot commit the transaction within the reservation code since it will deadlock, so we have to return EAGAIN and then make sure we don't retry too many times. Instead of doing this, just do the reservation the normal way before we join the transaction, that way we can do whatever we want to try and reclaim space, and then if it fails we know for sure we are out of space and we can return ENOSPC. Thanks, Signed-off-by:Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
Josef Bacik authored
I've been watching how many btrfs_search_slot()'s we do and I noticed that when we create a file with selinux enabled we were doing 2 each time we initialize the security context. That's because we lookup the xattr first so we can delete it if we're setting a new value to an existing xattr. But in the create case we don't have any xattrs, so it is completely useless to have the extra lookup. So re-arrange things so that we only lookup first if we specifically have XATTR_REPLACE. That way in the basic case we only do 1 search, and in the more complicated case we do the normal 2 lookups. Thanks, Signed-off-by:
-
- 06 Jul, 2011 3 commits
-
-
Miao Xie authored
We need to make sure the data relocation inode doesn't go through the delayed metadata updates, otherwise we get an oops during balance: kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4303! [SNIP] Call Trace: [<ffffffffa03143fd>] ? update_ref_for_cow+0x22d/0x330 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa0314951>] __btrfs_cow_block+0x451/0x5e0 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa031355d>] ? read_block_for_search+0x14d/0x4d0 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa0314beb>] btrfs_cow_block+0x10b/0x240 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa031acae>] btrfs_search_slot+0x49e/0x7a0 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa032d8af>] btrfs_lookup_inode+0x2f/0xa0 [btrfs] [<ffffffff8147bf0e>] ? mutex_lock+0x1e/0x50 [<ffffffffa0380cf1>] btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x71/0x160 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa037ff27>] ? __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x67/0x190 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa0381cf8>] btrfs_run_delayed_items+0xe8/0x120 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa03365e0>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x250/0x850 [btrfs] [<ffffffff810f91d9>] ? find_get_pages+0x39/0x130 [<ffffffffa0336cd5>] ? join_transaction+0x25/0x250 [btrfs] [<ffffffff81081de0>] ? wake_up_bit+0x40/0x40 [<ffffffffa03785fa>] prepare_to_relocate+0xda/0xf0 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa037f2bb>] relocate_block_group+0x4b/0x620 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa0334cf5>] ? btrfs_clean_old_snapshots+0x35/0x150 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa037fa43>] btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x1b3/0x2e0 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa0368ec0>] ? btrfs_tree_unlock+0x50/0x50 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa035e39b>] btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x8b/0x670 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa031303d>] ? btrfs_set_path_blocking+0x3d/0x50 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa03577d8>] ? read_extent_buffer+0xd8/0x1d0 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa031bea1>] ? btrfs_previous_item+0xb1/0x150 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa03577d8>] ? read_extent_buffer+0xd8/0x1d0 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa035f5aa>] btrfs_balance+0x21a/0x2b0 [btrfs] [<ffffffffa0368898>] btrfs_ioctl+0x798/0xd20 [btrfs] [<ffffffff8111e358>] ? handle_mm_fault+0x148/0x270 [<ffffffff814809e8>] ? do_page_fault+0x1d8/0x4b0 [<ffffffff81160d6a>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x9a/0x540 [<ffffffff811612b1>] sys_ioctl+0xa1/0xb0 [<ffffffff81484ec2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [SNIP] RIP [<ffffffffa037c1cc>] btrfs_reloc_cow_block+0x22c/0x270 [btrfs] Signed-off-by:
Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by:
Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
Josef Bacik authored
A user reported an error where if we try to balance an fs after a device has been removed it will blow up. This is because we get an EIO back and this is where BUG_ON(ret) bites us in the ass. To fix we just exit. Thanks, Reported-by:
Anand Jain <Anand.Jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by:
-
David Sterba authored
There are three missed mount options settable by user which are not currently displayed in mount output. Signed-off-by:
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by:
-
- 27 Jun, 2011 1 commit
-
-
Miao Xie authored
When iputting the inode, We may leave the delayed nodes if they have some delayed items that have not been dealt with. So when the inode is read again, we must look up the relative delayed node, and use the information in it to initialize the inode. Or we will get inconsonant inode information, it may cause that the same directory index number is allocated again, and hit the following oops: [ 5447.554187] err add delayed dir index item(name: pglog_0.965_0) into the insertion tree of the delayed node(root id: 262, inode id: 258, errno: -17) [ 5447.569766] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 5447.575361] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1301! [SNIP] [ 5447.790721] Call Trace: [ 5447.793191] [<ffffffffa0641c4e>] btrfs_insert_dir_item+0x189/0x1bb [btrfs] [ 5447.800156] [<ffffffffa0651a45>] btrfs_add_link+0x12b/0x191 [btrfs] [ 5447.806517] [<ffffffffa0651adc>] btrfs_add_nondir+0x31/0x58 [btrfs] [ 5447.812876] [<ffffffffa0651d6a>] btrfs_create+0xf9/0x197 [btrfs] [ 5447.818961] [<ffffffff8111f840>] vfs_create+0x72/0x92 [ 5447.824090] [<ffffffff8111fa8c>] do_last+0x22c/0x40b [ 5447.829133] [<ffffffff8112076a>] path_openat+0xc0/0x2ef [ 5447.834438] [<ffffffff810c58e2>] ? __perf_event_task_sched_out+0x24/0x44 [ 5447.841216] [<ffffffff8103ecdd>] ? perf_event_task_sched_out+0x59/0x67 [ 5447.847846] [<ffffffff81121a79>] do_filp_open+0x3d/0x87 [ 5447.853156] [<ffffffff811e126c>] ? strncpy_from_user+0x43/0x4d [ 5447.859072] [<ffffffff8111f1f5>] ? getname_flags+0x2e/0x80 [ 5447.864636] [<ffffffff8111f179>] ? do_getname+0x14b/0x173 [ 5447.870112] [<ffffffff8111f1b7>] ? audit_getname+0x16/0x26 [ 5447.875682] [<ffffffff8112b1ab>] ? spin_lock+0xe/0x10 [ 5447.880882] [<ffffffff81112d39>] do_sys_open+0x69/0xae [ 5447.886153] [<ffffffff81112db1>] sys_open+0x20/0x22 [ 5447.891114] [<ffffffff813b9aab>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Fix it by reusing the old delayed node. Reported-by:
Jim Schutt <jaschut@sandia.gov> Signed-off-by:
-
- 25 Jun, 2011 2 commits
-
-
Josef Bacik authored
A user reported this bug again where we have more bitmaps than we are supposed to. This is because we failed to load the free space cache, but don't update the ctl->total_bitmaps counter when we remove entries from the tree. This patch fixes this problem and we should be good to go again. Thanks, Signed-off-by:
-
Ilya Dryomov authored
data parameter should be u64 because a full-sized chunk flags field is passed instead of 0/1 for distinguishing data from metadata. All underlying functions expect u64. Signed-off-by:
Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
- 24 Jun, 2011 1 commit
-
-
Chris Mason authored
When we create a new inode, we aren't filling in the field that records the transaction that last changed this inode. If we then go to fsync that inode, it will be skipped because the field isn't filled in. Signed-off-by:
-
- 17 Jun, 2011 7 commits
-
-
Chris Mason authored
Snapshot creation has two phases. One is the initial snapshot setup, and the second is done during commit, while nobody is allowed to modify the root we are snapshotting. The delayed metadata insertion code can break that rule, it does a delayed inode update on the inode of the parent of the snapshot, and delayed directory item insertion. This makes sure to run the pending delayed operations before we record the snapshot root, which avoids corruptions. Signed-off-by: -
David Sterba authored
When allocation fails in btrfs_read_fs_root_no_name, ret is not set although it is returned, holding a garbage value. Signed-off-by:
Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Miao Xie authored
We have migrated the space for the delayed inode items from trans_block_rsv to global_block_rsv, but we forgot to set trans->block_rsv to global_block_rsv when we doing delayed inode operations, and the following Oops happened: [ 9792.654889] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 9792.654898] WARNING: at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:5681 btrfs_alloc_free_block+0xca/0x27c [btrfs]() [ 9792.654899] Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. [ 9792.654900] Modules linked in: btrfs zlib_deflate libcrc32c ip6t_REJECT nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 ip6table_filter ip6_tables arc4 rt61pci rt2x00pci rt2x00lib snd_hda_codec_hdmi mac80211 snd_hda_codec_realtek cfg80211 snd_hda_intel edac_core snd_seq rfkill pcspkr serio_raw snd_hda_codec eeprom_93cx6 edac_mce_amd sp5100_tco i2c_piix4 k10temp snd_hwdep snd_seq_device snd_pcm floppy r8169 xhci_hcd mii snd_timer snd soundcore snd_page_alloc ipv6 firewire_ohci pata_acpi ata_generic firewire_core pata_via crc_itu_t radeon ttm drm_kms_helper drm i2c_algo_bit i2c_core [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan] [ 9792.654919] Pid: 2762, comm: rm Tainted: G W 2.6.39+ #1 [ 9792.654920] Call Trace: [ 9792.654922] [<ffffffff81053c4a>] warn_slowpath_common+0x83/0x9b [ 9792.654925] [<ffffffff81053c7c>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x1c [ 9792.654933] [<ffffffffa038e747>] btrfs_alloc_free_block+0xca/0x27c [btrfs] [ 9792.654945] [<ffffffffa03b8562>] ? map_extent_buffer+0x6e/0xa8 [btrfs] [ 9792.654953] [<ffffffffa038189b>] __btrfs_cow_block+0xfc/0x30c [btrfs] [ 9792.654963] [<ffffffffa0396aa6>] ? btrfs_buffer_uptodate+0x47/0x58 [btrfs] [ 9792.654970] [<ffffffffa0382e48>] ? read_block_for_search+0x94/0x368 [btrfs] [ 9792.654978] [<ffffffffa0381ba9>] btrfs_cow_block+0xfe/0x146 [btrfs] [ 9792.654986] [<ffffffffa03848b0>] btrfs_search_slot+0x14d/0x4b6 [btrfs] [ 9792.654997] [<ffffffffa03b8562>] ? map_extent_buffer+0x6e/0xa8 [btrfs] [ 9792.655022] [<ffffffffa03938e8>] btrfs_lookup_inode+0x2f/0x8f [btrfs] [ 9792.655025] [<ffffffff8147afac>] ? _cond_resched+0xe/0x22 [ 9792.655027] [<ffffffff8147b892>] ? mutex_lock+0x29/0x50 [ 9792.655039] [<ffffffffa03d41b1>] btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x72/0x137 [btrfs] [ 9792.655051] [<ffffffffa03d4ea2>] btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x90/0xdb [btrfs] [ 9792.655062] [<ffffffffa039a69b>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x228/0x654 [btrfs] [ 9792.655064] [<ffffffff8106e8da>] ? remove_wait_queue+0x3a/0x3a [ 9792.655075] [<ffffffffa03a2fa5>] btrfs_evict_inode+0x14d/0x202 [btrfs] [ 9792.655077] [<ffffffff81132bd6>] evict+0x71/0x111 [ 9792.655079] [<ffffffff81132de0>] iput+0x12a/0x132 [ 9792.655081] [<ffffffff8112aa3a>] do_unlinkat+0x106/0x155 [ 9792.655083] [<ffffffff81127b83>] ? path_put+0x1f/0x23 [ 9792.655085] [<ffffffff8109c53c>] ? audit_syscall_entry+0x145/0x171 [ 9792.655087] [<ffffffff81128410>] ? putname+0x34/0x36 [ 9792.655090] [<ffffffff8112b441>] sys_unlinkat+0x29/0x2b [ 9792.655092] [<ffffffff81482c42>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [ 9792.655093] ---[ end trace 02b696eb02b3f768 ]--- This patch fix it by setting the reservation of the transaction handle to the correct one. Reported-by:
-
Maarten Lankhorst authored
Removes code no longer used. The sysfs file itself is kept, because the btrfs developers expressed interest in putting new entries to sysfs. Signed-off-by:
Maarten Lankhorst <m.b.lankhorst@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
David Sterba authored
smatch reports: btrfs_recover_log_trees error: 'wc.replay_dest' dereferencing possible ERR_PTR() Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Mason authored
Merge branch 'for-chris' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/josef/btrfs-work into for-linus Conflicts: fs/btrfs/transaction.c Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Mason authored
The recent commit to get rid of our trans_mutex introduced some races with block group relocation. The problem is that relocation needs to do some record keeping about each root, and it was relying on the transaction mutex to coordinate things in subtle ways. This fix adds a mutex just for the relocation code and makes sure it doesn't have a big impact on normal operations. The race is really fixed in btrfs_record_root_in_trans, which is where we step back and wait for the relocation code to finish accounting setup. Signed-off-by:
-
- 15 Jun, 2011 3 commits
-
-
Josef Bacik authored
We can lockup if we try to allow new writers join the transaction and we have flushoncommit set or have a pending snapshot. This is because we set no_trans_join and then loop around and try to wait for ordered extents again. The problem is the ordered endio stuff needs to join the transaction, which it can't do because no_trans_join is set. So instead wait until after this loop to set no_trans_join and then make sure to wait for num_writers == 1 in case anybody got started in between us exiting the loop and setting no_trans_join. This could easily be reproduced by mounting -o flushoncommit and running xfstest 13. It cannot be reproduced with this patch. Thanks, Reported-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
Currently there is nothing protecting the pending_snapshots list on the transaction. We only hold the directory mutex that we are snapshotting and a read lock on the subvol_sem, so we could race with somebody else creating a snapshot in a different directory and end up with list corruption. So protect this list with the trans_lock. Thanks, Signed-off-by: -
Josef Bacik authored
The delayed ref patch accidently removed the btrfs_free_path in btrfs_unlink_subvol, this puts it back and means we don't leak a path. Thanks, Signed-off-by:
-
- 13 Jun, 2011 2 commits
-
-
Chris Mason authored
Even when delalloc_bytes is zero, we may need to sleep while waiting for delalloc space. Signed-off-by: -
Chris Mason authored
Al Viro noticed we weren't checking for set_anon_super failures. This adds the required checks. Signed-off-by:
-
- 11 Jun, 2011 1 commit
-
-
Li Zefan authored
The WARN_ON() in start_transaction() was triggered while balancing. The cause is btrfs_relocate_chunk() started a transaction and then called iput() on the inode that stores free space cache, and iput() called btrfs_start_transaction() again. Reported-by:
Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by:
-
- 10 Jun, 2011 12 commits
-
-
Ilya Dryomov authored
Get rid of FIXME comment. Uuids from dmesg are now the same as uuids given by btrfs-progs. Signed-off-by:
-
Jan Schmidt authored
When encountering an EIO while reading from a nodatasum extent, we insert an error record into the inode's failure tree. btrfs_readpage_end_io_hook returns early for nodatasum inodes. We'd better clear the failure tree in that case, otherwise the kernel complains about BUG extent_state: Objects remaining on kmem_cache_close() on rmmod. Signed-off-by:
Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net> Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Mason authored
Merge branch 'for-chris' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arne/btrfs-unstable-arne into for-linus
-
David Sterba authored
list_splice_init will make delalloc_inodes empty, but without a spinlock around, this may produce corrupted list head, accessed in many placess, The race window is very tight and nobody seems to have hit it so far. Signed-off-by:
-
Li Zefan authored
The size of struct btrfs_ioctl_fs_info_args is as big as 1KB, so don't declare the variable on stack. Signed-off-by:
-
richard kennedy authored
Reorder extent_buffer to remove 8 bytes of alignment padding on 64 bit builds. This shrinks its size to 128 bytes allowing it to fit into one fewer cache lines and allows more objects per slab in its kmem_cache. slabinfo extent_buffer reports :- before:- Sizes (bytes) Slabs ---------------------------------- Object : 136 Total : 123 SlabObj: 136 Full : 121 SlabSiz: 4096 Partial: 0 Loss : 0 CpuSlab: 2 Align : 8 Objects: 30 after :- Object : 128 Total : 4 SlabObj: 128 Full : 2 SlabSiz: 4096 Partial: 0 Loss : 0 CpuSlab: 2 Align : 8 Objects: 32 Signed-off-by:Richard Kennedy <richard@rsk.demon.co.uk> Signed-off-by:
-
Sage Weil authored
Normally current->jouranl_info is cleared by commit_transaction. For an async snap or subvol creation, though, it runs in a work queue. Clear it in btrfs_commit_transaction_async() to avoid leaking a non-NULL journal_info when we return to userspace. When the actual commit runs in the other thread it won't care that it's current->journal_info is already NULL. Signed-off-by:
Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net> Tested-by:
-
Chris Mason authored
Josef recently changed the free extent cache to look in the block group cluster for any bitmaps before trying to add a new bitmap for the same offset. This avoids BUG_ON()s due covering duplicate ranges. But it didn't go quite far enough. A given free range might span between one or more bitmaps or free space entries. The code has looping to cover this, but it doesn't check for clustered bitmaps every time. This shuffles our gotos to check for a bitmap in the cluster for every new bitmap entry we try to add. Signed-off-by: -
Arne Jansen authored
Signed-off-by:Arne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>
-
Arne Jansen authored
Scrub starts the workers each time a scrub starts and stops them after it finished. This patch adds an initialization for the workers before each start, otherwise the workers behave strangely. Signed-off-by: -
Arne Jansen authored
due to the semantics of btrfs_search_slot the path can point to an invalid slot when ret > 0. This condition went unnoticed, which in turn could have led to an incomplete scrubbing. Signed-off-by: -
Josef Bacik authored
Arne's scrub stuff exposed a problem with mapping the extent buffer in reada_for_search. He searches the commit root with multiple threads and with skip_locking set, so we can race and overwrite node->map_token since node isn't locked. So fix this so that we only map the extent buffer if we don't already have a map_token and skip_locking isn't set. Without this patch scrub would panic almost immediately, with the patch it doesn't panic anymore. Thanks, Reported-by:
-
- 09 Jun, 2011 2 commits
-
-
Josef Bacik authored
In btrfs_wait_for_commit if we came upon a transaction that had committed we just exited, but that's bad since we are holding the trans_lock. So break instead so that the lock is dropped. Thanks, Reported-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
Arne's scrub stuff exposed a problem with mapping the extent buffer in reada_for_search. He searches the commit root with multiple threads and with skip_locking set, so we can race and overwrite node->map_token since node isn't locked. So fix this so that we only map the extent buffer if we don't already have a map_token and skip_locking isn't set. Without this patch scrub would panic almost immediately, with the patch it doesn't panic anymore. Thanks, Reported-by:
-
- 08 Jun, 2011 4 commits
-
-
Josef Bacik authored
When merging my code into the integration test the second check for duplicate entries got screwed up. This patch fixes it by dropping ret2 and just using ret for the return value, and checking if we got an error before adding the bitmap to the local list. Thanks, Signed-off-by: -
Josef Bacik authored
I was testing with empty_cluster = 0 to try and reproduce a problem and kept hitting early enospc panics. This was because our loop logic was a little confused. So this is what I did 1) Make the loop variable the ultimate decider on wether we should loop again isntead of checking to see if we had an uncached bg, empty size or empty cluster. 2) Increment loop before checking to see what we are on to make the loop definitions make more sense. 3) If we are on the chunk alloc loop don't set empty_size/empty_cluster to 0 unless we didn't actually allocate a chunk. If we did allocate a chunk we should be able to easily setup a new cluster so clearing empty_size/empty_cluster makes us less efficient. This kept me from hitting panics while trying to reproduce the other problem. Thanks, Signed-off-by: -
Josef Bacik authored
In cleaning up the clustering code I accidently introduced a regression by adding bitmap entries to the cluster rb tree. The problem is if we've maxed out the number of bitmaps we can have for the block group we can only add free space to the bitmaps, but since the bitmap is on the cluster we can't find it and we try to create another one. This would result in a panic because the total bitmaps was bigger than the max bitmaps that were allowed. This patch fixes this by checking to see if we have a cluster, and then looking at the cluster rb tree to see if it has a bitmap entry and if it does and that space belongs to that bitmap, go ahead and add it to that bitmap. I could hit this panic every time with an fs_mark test within a couple of minutes. With this patch I no longer hit the panic and fs_mark goes to completion. Thanks, Signed-off-by: -
Josef Bacik authored
I noticed when running an enospc test that we would get stuck committing the transaction in check_data_space even though we truly didn't have enough space. So check to see if bytes_pinned is bigger than num_bytes, if it's not don't commit the transaction. Thanks, Signed-off-by:
-
