- 16 Apr, 2010 10 commits
-
-
Johannes Berg authored
Scan requesting doesn't need to be asynchronous since all code paths leading up to it can sleep. Make the scan request a new util operation that is hw-specific (to account for 3945 vs. agn) and call it right in place. This patch moves a lot of code into iwlagn as it need not be in iwlcore. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
-
Johannes Berg authored
I keep checking what "priv->scan" is, so rename it to "priv->scan_cmd" which more clearly tells us what it is. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
-
Johannes Berg authored
Since we no longer do a multi-pass scan, keeping track of how long each pass took is pointless since there will only be one. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
-
Johannes Berg authored
This logic is just confusing, if anything it belongs into mac80211. Also, even if we do scan during the EAPOL handshake, that will not cause any problems, just a short delay. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
-
Johannes Berg authored
With atomic bitops, test_and_{set,clear}_bit should be used instead of separate test_bit and set_bit/clear_bit. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
-
Johannes Berg authored
Since mac80211 will now never request scanning multiple bands, we can remove all the associated logic and scan a single band only in each scan. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
-
Wey-Yi Guy authored
Even the initial single/dual stream values will be overridden later when issue link quality command; but still make sense not to use hard-code value during initialization. Single/Dual stream mask are used to indicate the best antenna for SISO/MIMO; different NIC has different tx antenna configuration; so the parameter need to based on the valid tx antenna. 1x2 device: single tx antenna available, only SISO is valid configuration, but still need to set up MIMO configuration, so set it up with antenna A & B as default. 2x2 device: two tx antenna available, dual_stream will use both valid antenna. 3x3 device: three tx antenna available, skip the first antenna and choice the second and third antenna for dual_stream. Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
-
Reinette Chatre authored
Conflicts: drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-6000.c
-
Shanyu Zhao authored
For 6000 series, the 2.4G HT40 band regulatory settings address in EEPROM was off by 2. Before the fix, you'll see this in dmesg: [79535.788877] ieee80211 phy8: U iwl_mod_ht40_chan_info HT40 Ch. 7 [2.4GHz] WIDE (0x61 0dBm): Ad-Hoc not supported [79535.788880] ieee80211 phy8: U iwl_mod_ht40_chan_info HT40 Ch. 11 [2.4GHz] WIDE (0x61 0dBm): Ad-Hoc not supported And after the fix: [91132.688706] ieee80211 phy14: U iwl_mod_ht40_chan_info HT40 Ch. 7 [2.4GHz] IBSS ACTIVE WIDE (0x6f 0dBm): Ad-Hoc supported [91132.688709] ieee80211 phy14: U iwl_mod_ht40_chan_info HT40 Ch. 11 [2.4GHz] IBSS ACTIVE WIDE (0x6f 0dBm): Ad-Hoc supported Signed-off-by: Shanyu Zhao <shanyu.zhao@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
-
Johannes Berg authored
When an internal scan is started, nothing protects the is_internal_short_scan variable which can cause crashes, cf. https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15667. Fix this by making the short scan request use the mutex for locking, which requires making the request go to a work struct so that it can sleep. Reported-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
-
- 14 Apr, 2010 9 commits
-
-
Xose Vazquez Perez authored
A very useful information was provided by Sitecom R&D guys: Please find the information regarding our latest Ralink adapters below; WL-302 - VID: 0x0DF6, PID: 0x002D - Ralink RT2771 WL-315 - VID: 0x0DF6, PID: 0x0039 - Ralink RT2770 WL-319 - VID: 0x182D, PID: 0x0037 - Ralink RT2860 WL-321 - VID: 0x0DF6, PID: 0x003B - Ralink RT2770 WL-324 - VID: 0x0DF6, PID: 0x003D - Ralink RT2870 WL-329 - VID: 0x0DF6, PID: 0x0041 - Ralink RT3572 WL-343 - VID: 0x0DF6, PID: 0x003E - Ralink RT3070 WL-344 - VID: 0x0DF6, PID: 0x0040 - Ralink RT3071 WL-345 - VID: 0x0DF6, PID: 0x0042 - Ralink RT3072 WL-608 - VID: 0x0DF6, PID: 0x003F - Ralink RT2070 Note: PID: 0x003C, 0x004A, and 0x004D: --these products do not exist; devices were never produced/shipped-- The WL-349v4 USB dongle (0x0df6,0x0050) will be shipped soon (it isn't available yet), and uses a Ralink RT3370 chipset. Signed-off-by: Xose Vazquez Perez <xose.vazquez@gmail.com> Acked-by: Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Christian Lamparter authored
This patch adds the following 5 entries to the usbid device table: * Netgear WNA1000 * Proxim ORiNOCO Dual Band 802.11n USB Adapter * 3Com Dual Band 802.11n USB Adapter * H3C Dual Band 802.11n USB Adapter * WNC Generic 11n USB dongle CC: <stable@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@googlemail.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Grazvydas Ignotas authored
If EEPROM is used, NVS data is now loaded but ignored. Stop loading it to avoid need of dummy NVS file for modules with EEPROM. Signed-off-by: Grazvydas Ignotas <notasas@gmail.com> Acked-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@adurom.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Ming Lei authored
This patch fixes two warnings below after unplugging ar9271 usb device: -one is a kernel warning[1] -another is a lockdep warning[2] The root reason is that __skb_queue_purge can't be executed in hardirq context, so the patch forks ath9k_skb_queue_purge(ath9k version of _skb_queue_purge), which frees skb with dev_kfree_skb_any which can be run in hardirq context safely, then prevent the lockdep warning and kernel warning after unplugging ar9271 usb device. [1] kernel warning [ 602.894005] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 602.894005] WARNING: at net/core/skbuff.c:398 skb_release_head_state+0x71/0x87() [ 602.894005] Hardware name: 6475EK2 [ 602.894005] Modules linked in: ath9k_htc ath9k ath9k_common ath9k_hw ath bridge stp llc sunrpc ipv6 cpufreq_ondemand acpi_cpufreq freq_table kvm_intel kvm arc4 ecb mac80211 snd_hda_codec_conexant snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep thinkpad_acpi snd_pcm snd_timer hwmon iTCO_wdt snd e1000e pcspkr i2c_i801 usbhid iTCO_vendor_support wmi cfg80211 yenta_socket rsrc_nonstatic pata_acpi snd_page_alloc soundcore uhci_hcd ohci_hcd ehci_hcd usbcore i915 drm_kms_helper drm i2c_algo_bit i2c_core video output [last unloaded: ath] [ 602.894005] Pid: 2506, comm: ping Tainted: G W 2.6.34-rc3-wl #20 [ 602.894005] Call Trace: [ 602.894005] <IRQ> [<ffffffff8104a41c>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7c/0x94 [ 602.894005] [<ffffffffa022f398>] ? __skb_queue_purge+0x43/0x4a [ath9k_htc] [ 602.894005] [<ffffffff8104a448>] warn_slowpath_null+0x14/0x16 [ 602.894005] [<ffffffff813269c1>] skb_release_head_state+0x71/0x87 [ 602.894005] [<ffffffff8132829a>] __kfree_skb+0x16/0x81 [ 602.894005] [<ffffffff813283b2>] kfree_skb+0x7e/0x86 [ 602.894005] [<ffffffffa022f398>] __skb_queue_purge+0x43/0x4a [ath9k_htc] [ 602.894005] [<ffffffffa022f560>] __hif_usb_tx+0x1c1/0x21b [ath9k_htc] [ 602.894005] [<ffffffffa022f73c>] hif_usb_tx_cb+0x12f/0x154 [ath9k_htc] [ 602.894005] [<ffffffffa00d2fbe>] usb_hcd_giveback_urb+0x91/0xc5 [usbcore] [ 602.894005] [<ffffffffa00f6c34>] ehci_urb_done+0x7a/0x8b [ehci_hcd] [ 602.894005] [<ffffffffa00f6f33>] qh_completions+0x2ee/0x376 [ehci_hcd] [ 602.894005] [<ffffffffa00f8ba5>] ehci_work+0x95/0x76e [ehci_hcd] [ 602.894005] [<ffffffffa00fa5ae>] ? ehci_irq+0x2f/0x1d4 [ehci_hcd] [ 602.894005] [<ffffffffa00fa725>] ehci_irq+0x1a6/0x1d4 [ehci_hcd] [ 602.894005] [<ffffffff810a6d18>] ? __rcu_process_callbacks+0x7a/0x2df [ 602.894005] [<ffffffff810a47a4>] ? handle_fasteoi_irq+0x22/0xd2 [ 602.894005] [<ffffffffa00d268d>] usb_hcd_irq+0x4a/0xa7 [usbcore] [ 602.894005] [<ffffffff810a2853>] handle_IRQ_event+0x77/0x14f [ 602.894005] [<ffffffff813285ce>] ? skb_release_data+0xc9/0xce [ 602.894005] [<ffffffff810a4814>] handle_fasteoi_irq+0x92/0xd2 [ 602.894005] [<ffffffff8100c4fb>] handle_irq+0x88/0x91 [ 602.894005] [<ffffffff8100baed>] do_IRQ+0x63/0xc9 [ 602.894005] [<ffffffff81354245>] ? ip_flush_pending_frames+0x4d/0x5c [ 602.894005] [<ffffffff813ba993>] ret_from_intr+0x0/0x16 [ 602.894005] <EOI> [<ffffffff811095fe>] ? __delete_object+0x5a/0xb1 [ 602.894005] [<ffffffff813ba5f5>] ? _raw_write_unlock_irqrestore+0x47/0x7e [ 602.894005] [<ffffffff813ba5fa>] ? _raw_write_unlock_irqrestore+0x4c/0x7e [ 602.894005] [<ffffffff811095fe>] __delete_object+0x5a/0xb1 [ 602.894005] [<ffffffff81109814>] delete_object_full+0x25/0x31 [ 602.894005] [<ffffffff813a60c0>] kmemleak_free+0x26/0x45 [ 602.894005] [<ffffffff810ff517>] kfree+0xaa/0x149 [ 602.894005] [<ffffffff81323fb7>] ? sock_def_write_space+0x84/0x89 [ 602.894005] [<ffffffff81354245>] ? ip_flush_pending_frames+0x4d/0x5c [ 602.894005] [<ffffffff813285ce>] skb_release_data+0xc9/0xce [ 602.894005] [<ffffffff813282a2>] __kfree_skb+0x1e/0x81 [ 602.894005] [<ffffffff813283b2>] kfree_skb+0x7e/0x86 [ 602.894005] [<ffffffff81354245>] ip_flush_pending_frames+0x4d/0x5c [ 602.894005] [<ffffffff81370c1f>] raw_sendmsg+0x653/0x709 [ 602.894005] [<ffffffff81379e31>] inet_sendmsg+0x54/0x5d [ 602.894005] [<ffffffff813207a2>] ? sock_recvmsg+0xc6/0xdf [ 602.894005] [<ffffffff813208c1>] sock_sendmsg+0xc0/0xd9 [ 602.894005] [<ffffffff810e13b4>] ? might_fault+0x68/0xb8 [ 602.894005] [<ffffffff810e13fd>] ? might_fault+0xb1/0xb8 [ 602.894005] [<ffffffff8132a1c3>] ? copy_from_user+0x2f/0x31 [ 602.894005] [<ffffffff8132a5b3>] ? verify_iovec+0x54/0x91 [ 602.894005] [<ffffffff81320d41>] sys_sendmsg+0x1da/0x241 [ 602.894005] [<ffffffff8103d327>] ? finish_task_switch+0x0/0xc9 [ 602.894005] [<ffffffff8103d327>] ? finish_task_switch+0x0/0xc9 [ 602.894005] [<ffffffff8107642e>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x16/0x150 [ 602.894005] [<ffffffff813ba27d>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x56/0x63 [ 602.894005] [<ffffffff8103d3cb>] ? finish_task_switch+0xa4/0xc9 [ 602.894005] [<ffffffff8103d327>] ? finish_task_switch+0x0/0xc9 [ 602.894005] [<ffffffff810357fe>] ? need_resched+0x23/0x2d [ 602.894005] [<ffffffff8107642e>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x16/0x150 [ 602.894005] [<ffffffff813b9750>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f [ 602.894005] [<ffffffff81009c02>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [ 602.894005] ---[ end trace 91ba2d8dc7826839 ]--- [2] lockdep warning [ 169.363215] ====================================================== [ 169.365390] [ INFO: HARDIRQ-safe -> HARDIRQ-unsafe lock order detected ] [ 169.366334] 2.6.34-rc3-wl #20 [ 169.366872] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 169.366872] khubd/78 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire: [ 169.366872] (clock-AF_INET){++.?..}, at: [<ffffffff81323f51>] sock_def_write_space+0x1e/0x89 [ 169.366872] [ 169.366872] and this task is already holding: [ 169.366872] (&(&hif_dev->tx.tx_lock)->rlock){-.-...}, at: [<ffffffffa03715b0>] hif_usb_stop+0x24/0x53 [ath9k_htc] [ 169.366872] which would create a new lock dependency: [ 169.366872] (&(&hif_dev->tx.tx_lock)->rlock){-.-...} -> (clock-AF_INET){++.?..} [ 169.366872] [ 169.366872] but this new dependency connects a HARDIRQ-irq-safe lock: [ 169.366872] (&(&hif_dev->tx.tx_lock)->rlock){-.-...} [ 169.366872] ... which became HARDIRQ-irq-safe at: [ 169.366872] [<ffffffff810772d5>] __lock_acquire+0x2c6/0xd2b [ 169.366872] [<ffffffff8107866d>] lock_acquire+0xec/0x119 [ 169.366872] [<ffffffff813b99bb>] _raw_spin_lock+0x40/0x73 [ 169.366872] [<ffffffffa037163d>] hif_usb_tx_cb+0x5e/0x154 [ath9k_htc] [ 169.366872] [<ffffffffa00d2fbe>] usb_hcd_giveback_urb+0x91/0xc5 [usbcore] [ 169.366872] [<ffffffffa00f6c34>] ehci_urb_done+0x7a/0x8b [ehci_hcd] [ 169.366872] [<ffffffffa00f6f33>] qh_completions+0x2ee/0x376 [ehci_hcd] [ 169.366872] [<ffffffffa00f8ba5>] ehci_work+0x95/0x76e [ehci_hcd] [ 169.366872] [<ffffffffa00fa725>] ehci_irq+0x1a6/0x1d4 [ehci_hcd] [ 169.366872] [<ffffffffa00d268d>] usb_hcd_irq+0x4a/0xa7 [usbcore] [ 169.366872] [<ffffffff810a2853>] handle_IRQ_event+0x77/0x14f [ 169.366872] [<ffffffff810a4814>] handle_fasteoi_irq+0x92/0xd2 [ 169.366872] [<ffffffff8100c4fb>] handle_irq+0x88/0x91 [ 169.366872] [<ffffffff8100baed>] do_IRQ+0x63/0xc9 [ 169.366872] [<ffffffff813ba993>] ret_from_intr+0x0/0x16 [ 169.366872] [<ffffffff8130f6ee>] cpuidle_idle_call+0xa7/0x115 [ 169.366872] [<ffffffff81008c4f>] cpu_idle+0x68/0xc4 [ 169.366872] [<ffffffff813a41e0>] rest_init+0x104/0x10b [ 169.366872] [<ffffffff81899db3>] start_kernel+0x3f1/0x3fc [ 169.366872] [<ffffffff818992c8>] x86_64_start_reservations+0xb3/0xb7 [ 169.366872] [<ffffffff818993c4>] x86_64_start_kernel+0xf8/0x107 [ 169.366872] [ 169.366872] to a HARDIRQ-irq-unsafe lock: [ 169.366872] (clock-AF_INET){++.?..} [ 169.366872] ... which became HARDIRQ-irq-unsafe at: [ 169.366872] ... [<ffffffff81077349>] __lock_acquire+0x33a/0xd2b [ 169.366872] [<ffffffff8107866d>] lock_acquire+0xec/0x119 [ 169.366872] [<ffffffff813b9d07>] _raw_write_lock_bh+0x45/0x7a [ 169.366872] [<ffffffff8135cf14>] tcp_close+0x165/0x34d [ 169.366872] [<ffffffff8137aced>] inet_release+0x55/0x5c [ 169.366872] [<ffffffff81321350>] sock_release+0x1f/0x6e [ 169.366872] [<ffffffff813213c6>] sock_close+0x27/0x2b [ 169.366872] [<ffffffff8110dd45>] __fput+0x125/0x1ca [ 169.366872] [<ffffffff8110de04>] fput+0x1a/0x1c [ 169.366872] [<ffffffff8110adc9>] filp_close+0x68/0x72 [ 169.366872] [<ffffffff8110ae80>] sys_close+0xad/0xe7 [ 169.366872] [<ffffffff81009c02>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b (Trimmed at the "other info that might help us debug this" line in the interest of brevity... -- JWL) Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com> Acked-by: Sujith <Sujith.Manoharan@atheros.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Ming Lei authored
In ath9k-htc register out path, ath9k-htc will pass skb->data into usb hcd and usb hcd will do dma mapping and unmapping to the buffer pointed by skb->data, so we should pass a cache-line aligned address. This patch replace __dev_alloc_skb with alloc_skb to make skb->data pointed to a cacheline aligned address simply since ath9k-htc does not skb_push on the skb and pass it to mac80211, also use kfree_skb to free the skb allocated by alloc_skb(we can use kfree_skb safely in hardirq context since skb->destructor is NULL always in the path). Signed-off-by: Sujith <Sujith.Manoharan@atheros.com> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Ming Lei authored
In ath9k-htc register in path, ath9k-htc will pass skb->data into usb hcd and usb hcd will do dma mapping and unmapping to the buffer pointed by skb->data, so we should pass a cache-line aligned address. This patch replace __dev_alloc_skb with alloc_skb to make skb->data pointed to a cacheline aligned address simply since ath9k-htc does not skb_push on the skb and pass it to mac80211, also use kfree_skb to free the skb allocated by alloc_skb(we can use kfree_skb safely in hardirq context since skb->destructor is NULL always in the path). Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Ming Lei authored
In ath9k_hif_usb_alloc_rx_urbs, ath9k-htc will pass skb->data into usb hcd and usb hcd will do dma mapping and unmapping to the buffer pointed by skb->data, so we should pass a cache-line aligned address. This patch replace __dev_alloc_skb with alloc_skb to make skb->data pointed to a cacheline aligned address simply since ath9k-htc does not skb_push on the skb and pass it to mac80211, also use kfree_skb to free the skbs allocated by alloc_skb(we can use kfree_skb safely in hardirq context since skb->destructor is NULL always in the path). Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Bruno Randolf authored
We get RXORN interrupts when all receive buffers are full. This is not necessarily a fatal situation. It can also happen when the bus is busy or the CPU is not fast enough to process all frames. Older chipsets apparently need a reset to come out of this situration, but on newer chips we can treat RXORN like RX, as going thru a full reset does more harm than good, there. The exact chip revisions which need a reset are unknown - this guess AR5K_SREV_AR5212 ("venice") is copied from the HAL. Inspired by openwrt 413-rxorn.patch: "treat rxorn like rx, reset after rxorn seems to do more harm than good" Signed-off-by: Bruno Randolf <br1@einfach.org> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Bruno Randolf authored
There was a confusion in the usage of the bits AR5K_STA_ID1_ACKCTS_6MB and AR5K_STA_ID1_BASE_RATE_11B. If they are set (1), we will get lower bitrates for ACK and CTS. Therefore ath5k_hw_set_ack_bitrate_high(ah, false) actually resulted in high bitrates, which i think is what we want anyways. Cleared the confusion and added some documentation. Signed-off-by: Bruno Randolf <br1@einfach.org> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
- 12 Apr, 2010 11 commits
-
-
Gertjan van Wingerde authored
Add RT3390 specific register initializations to rt2x00, based on the latest Ralink rt3390 vendor driver. Untested as I don't actually own an RT3390 based device, but given experiences on rt3070/rt3071 very hopeful that this will actually work.. Signed-off-by: Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Gertjan van Wingerde authored
Add RT3090 specific register initializations to rt2x00, based on the latest Ralink rt3090 vendor driver. Untested as I don't actually own an RT3090 based device, but given experiences on rt3070/rt3071 very hopeful that this will actually work.. Signed-off-by: Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Gertjan van Wingerde authored
Add RT3071 specific register initializations to rt2x00, based on the latest Ralink rt3070 vendor driver. With this patch my RT3071 based devices start showing a sign of life. Signed-off-by: Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Gertjan van Wingerde authored
rt2x00 had preliminary support for RT3070 based devices, but the support was incomplete. Update the RT3070 register initialization to be similar to the latest Ralink vendor driver. With this patch my rt3070 based devices start showing a sign of life. Signed-off-by: Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Gertjan van Wingerde authored
Align the rt2800 register initializations with the latest versions of the Ralink vendor driver. This patch is also preparation for the addition of support for RT3070 / RT3071 / RT3090 / RT3390 based devices. Signed-off-by: Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Gertjan van Wingerde authored
The rt2800 version constants are inconsistent, and the version number don't mean a lot of things anyway. Refactor the constants to have some more meaningful names, and introduce and use some new helpers to check these chipset revisions. At the same time rename to revision, as they are more revision numbers rather than version numbers. Signed-off-by: Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Gertjan van Wingerde authored
Only include definitions for RT chipsets that are also used inside the Ralink vendor drivers. Signed-off-by: Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Gertjan van Wingerde authored
Definitions taken from the latest rt2860 / rt2870 / rt3070 / rt3090 Ralink vendor drivers. Signed-off-by: Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Gertjan van Wingerde authored
It seems that the distinction between RF channel switch method is solely based on the RF chipset that is used. Refactor the channel switch decision to just take the RF chipset into account, thereby greatly simplifying the check. Signed-off-by: Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com> Acked-by: Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Quintin Pitts authored
This patch fixes an old problem, which - under certain circumstances - could cause the device to become unresponsive. most of p54pci's rx-ring management is implemented in just two distinct standalone functions. p54p_check_rx_ring takes care of processing incoming data, while p54p_refill_rx_ring tries to replenish all depleted communication buffers. This has always worked fine on my fast machine, but now I know there is a hidden race... The most likely candidate here is ring_control->device_idx. Quintin Pitts had already analyzed the culprit and posted a patch back in Oct 2009. But sadly, no one's picked up on this. ( https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/53079/ [2 & 3] ). This patch does the same way, except that it also prioritize rx data processing, simply because tx routines *can* wait. Reported-by: Sean Young <sean@mess.org> Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11386Reported-by: Quintin Pitts <geek4linux@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Quintin Pitts <geek4linux@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@googlemail.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
John W. Linville authored
Merge branch 'wireless-next-2.6' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/iwlwifi/iwlwifi-2.6
-
- 09 Apr, 2010 10 commits
-
-
Zhu Yi authored
We used to free all the Tx queues memory when interface is brought down and reallocate them again in interface up. This requires order-4 allocation for txq->cmd[]. In situations like s2ram, this usually leads to allocation failure in the memory subsystem. The patch fixed this problem by allocating the Tx queues memory only at the first time. Later iwl_down/iwl_up only initialize but don't free and reallocate them. The memory is freed at the device removal time. BTW, we have already done this for the Rx queue. This fixed bug https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15551Signed-off-by: Zhu Yi <yi.zhu@intel.com> Acked-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
-
Wey-Yi Guy authored
Check return code on iwl_send_cmd_pdu() to get rid of compiler warning. Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
-
Reinette Chatre authored
Fixes: CC [M] drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-rs.o drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-rs.c: In function ‘rs_get_rate’: drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-rs.c:2419: warning: unused variable ‘priv’ CC [M] drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-sta.o drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-sta.c: In function ‘iwl_send_add_sta’: drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-sta.c:197: warning: unused variable ‘sta_id’ drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-3945.c: In function ‘iwl3945_rx_reply_rx’: drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-3945.c:601: warning: unused variable ‘rx_stats_noise_diff’ drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-3945.c:600: warning: unused variable ‘rx_stats_sig_avg’ drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-3945-rs.c: In function ‘rs_get_rate’: drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-3945-rs.c:650: warning: unused variable ‘priv’ Reported-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <lrodriguez@atheros.com> Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
-
Wey-Yi Guy authored
REPLY_TX_LINK_QUALITY_CMD was used by 4965, 5000 series and up Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
-
Wey-Yi Guy authored
Update to include additional tx command response status for "_agn" devices. The following status indicate the transmission was postponed: TX_STATUS_POSTPONE_DELAY TX_STATUS_POSTPONE_FEW_BYTES TX_STATUS_POSTPONE_BT_PRIO TX_STATUS_POSTPONE_QUIET_PERIOD TX_STATUS_POSTPONE_CALC_TTAK Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
-
Wey-Yi Guy authored
When sys assert happen, driver will dump the error table information provided by uCode. There are more information available but is not being display by the driver; adding program counter and last host command the to log to help uCode debugging. Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
-
Johannes Berg authored
The last_phy_res[100] variable is used in an odd way. The first byte of it is used as a flag, and the rest as the data. Thus, the array need only be 61 bytes, since it is just the flag and a struct iwl_rx_phy_res (which is 60 bytes). Clean this up by splitting the variable into two: last_phy_res and last_phy_res_valid, using correct types for both (struct and bool). While doing all this also move the variables to the _agn part of the hw-specific union since they only apply to A-MPDUs. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
-
Johannes Berg authored
lq->sta_id cannot be invalid here since this function will only be called after the station has been added properly. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
-
Johannes Berg authored
Simplify the WEP group key check by checking the sta pointer instead of the sta_id we calculate with it; also clean up the comment formatting. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
-
Johannes Berg authored
Default WEP keys and regular keys are not allocated from the same space in the firmware, so we shouldn't use the same bits to indicate in use. For default WEP keys, however, mac80211 won't allow using the same key index twice, so the check is not necessary at all -- add/remove are perfectly nested due to those checks. Other keys are allocated in the device in a global array that only has a certain number of slots, so for that we need to keep the allocation bitmap; but the 802.11 key index isn't relevant there. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
-