- 25 Sep, 2012 1 commit
-
-
Paul E. McKenney authored
Merge branches 'bigrt.2012.09.23a', 'doctorture.2012.09.23a', 'fixes.2012.09.23a', 'hotplug.2012.09.23a' and 'idlechop.2012.09.23a' into HEAD bigrt.2012.09.23a contains additional commits to reduce scheduling latency from RCU on huge systems (many hundrends or thousands of CPUs). doctorture.2012.09.23a contains documentation changes and rcutorture fixes. fixes.2012.09.23a contains miscellaneous fixes. hotplug.2012.09.23a contains CPU-hotplug-related changes. idle.2012.09.23a fixes architectures for which RCU no longer considered the idle loop to be a quiescent state due to earlier adaptive-dynticks changes. Affected architectures are alpha, cris, frv, h8300, m32r, m68k, mn10300, parisc, score, xtensa, and ia64.
-
- 23 Sep, 2012 39 commits
-
-
Paul E. McKenney authored
Traditionally, the entire idle task served as an RCU quiescent state. But when RCU read side critical sections started appearing within the idle loop, this traditional strategy became untenable. The fix was to create new RCU APIs named rcu_idle_enter() and rcu_idle_exit(), which must be called by each architecture's idle loop so that RCU can tell when it is safe to ignore a given idle CPU. Unfortunately, this fix was never applied to ia64, a shortcoming remedied by this commit. Reported by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Signed-off-by:
Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.3+ Signed-off-by:
Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Tested by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Reviewed-by:
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
-
Frederic Weisbecker authored
In the old times, the whole idle task was considered as an RCU quiescent state. But as RCU became more and more successful overtime, some RCU read side critical section have been added even in the code of some architectures idle tasks, for tracing for example. So nowadays, rcu_idle_enter() and rcu_idle_exit() must be called by the architecture to tell RCU about the part in the idle loop that doesn't make use of rcu read side critical sections, typically the part that puts the CPU in low power mode. This is necessary for RCU to find the quiescent states in idle in order to complete grace periods. Add this missing pair of calls in the xtensa's idle loop. Reported-by:
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.3+ Signed-off-by:
-
Frederic Weisbecker authored
In the old times, the whole idle task was considered as an RCU quiescent state. But as RCU became more and more successful overtime, some RCU read side critical section have been added even in the code of some architectures idle tasks, for tracing for example. So nowadays, rcu_idle_enter() and rcu_idle_exit() must be called by the architecture to tell RCU about the part in the idle loop that doesn't make use of rcu read side critical sections, typically the part that puts the CPU in low power mode. This is necessary for RCU to find the quiescent states in idle in order to complete grace periods. Add this missing pair of calls in scores's idle loop. Reported-by:
-
Frederic Weisbecker authored
In the old times, the whole idle task was considered as an RCU quiescent state. But as RCU became more and more successful overtime, some RCU read side critical section have been added even in the code of some architectures idle tasks, for tracing for example. So nowadays, rcu_idle_enter() and rcu_idle_exit() must be called by the architecture to tell RCU about the part in the idle loop that doesn't make use of rcu read side critical sections, typically the part that puts the CPU in low power mode. This is necessary for RCU to find the quiescent states in idle in order to complete grace periods. Add this missing pair of calls in the parisc's idle loop. Reported-by:
-
Frederic Weisbecker authored
In the old times, the whole idle task was considered as an RCU quiescent state. But as RCU became more and more successful overtime, some RCU read side critical section have been added even in the code of some architectures idle tasks, for tracing for example. So nowadays, rcu_idle_enter() and rcu_idle_exit() must be called by the architecture to tell RCU about the part in the idle loop that doesn't make use of rcu read side critical sections, typically the part that puts the CPU in low power mode. This is necessary for RCU to find the quiescent states in idle in order to complete grace periods. Add this missing pair of calls in the mn10300's idle loop. Reported-by:
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Frederic Weisbecker authored
In the old times, the whole idle task was considered as an RCU quiescent state. But as RCU became more and more successful overtime, some RCU read side critical section have been added even in the code of some architectures idle tasks, for tracing for example. So nowadays, rcu_idle_enter() and rcu_idle_exit() must be called by the architecture to tell RCU about the part in the idle loop that doesn't make use of rcu read side critical sections, typically the part that puts the CPU in low power mode. This is necessary for RCU to find the quiescent states in idle in order to complete grace periods. Add this missing pair of calls in the m68k's idle loop. Reported-by:
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: m68k <linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.3+ Signed-off-by:
-
Frederic Weisbecker authored
In the old times, the whole idle task was considered as an RCU quiescent state. But as RCU became more and more successful overtime, some RCU read side critical section have been added even in the code of some architectures idle tasks, for tracing for example. So nowadays, rcu_idle_enter() and rcu_idle_exit() must be called by the architecture to tell RCU about the part in the idle loop that doesn't make use of rcu read side critical sections, typically the part that puts the CPU in low power mode. This is necessary for RCU to find the quiescent states in idle in order to complete grace periods. Add this missing pair of calls in the m32r's idle loop. Reported-by:
-
Frederic Weisbecker authored
In the old times, the whole idle task was considered as an RCU quiescent state. But as RCU became more and more successful overtime, some RCU read side critical section have been added even in the code of some architectures idle tasks, for tracing for example. So nowadays, rcu_idle_enter() and rcu_idle_exit() must be called by the architecture to tell RCU about the part in the idle loop that doesn't make use of rcu read side critical sections, typically the part that puts the CPU in low power mode. This is necessary for RCU to find the quiescent states in idle in order to complete grace periods. Add this missing pair of calls in the h8300's idle loop. Reported-by:
-
Frederic Weisbecker authored
In the old times, the whole idle task was considered as an RCU quiescent state. But as RCU became more and more successful overtime, some RCU read side critical section have been added even in the code of some architectures idle tasks, for tracing for example. So nowadays, rcu_idle_enter() and rcu_idle_exit() must be called by the architecture to tell RCU about the part in the idle loop that doesn't make use of rcu read side critical sections, typically the part that puts the CPU in low power mode. This is necessary for RCU to find the quiescent states in idle in order to complete grace periods. Add this missing pair of calls in the Frv's idle loop. Reported-by:
-
Frederic Weisbecker authored
In the old times, the whole idle task was considered as an RCU quiescent state. But as RCU became more and more successful overtime, some RCU read side critical section have been added even in the code of some architectures idle tasks, for tracing for example. So nowadays, rcu_idle_enter() and rcu_idle_exit() must be called by the architecture to tell RCU about the part in the idle loop that doesn't make use of rcu read side critical sections, typically the part that puts the CPU in low power mode. This is necessary for RCU to find the quiescent states in idle in order to complete grace periods. Add this missing pair of calls in the Cris's idle loop. Reported-by:
-
Frederic Weisbecker authored
In the old times, the whole idle task was considered as an RCU quiescent state. But as RCU became more and more successful overtime, some RCU read side critical section have been added even in the code of some architectures idle tasks, for tracing for example. So nowadays, rcu_idle_enter() and rcu_idle_exit() must be called by the architecture to tell RCU about the part in the idle loop that doesn't make use of rcu read side critical sections, typically the part that puts the CPU in low power mode. This is necessary for RCU to find the quiescent states in idle in order to complete grace periods. Add this missing pair of calls in the Alpha's idle loop. Reported-by:
Michael Cree <mcree@orcon.net.nz> Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net> Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru> Cc: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com> Cc: alpha <linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.3+ Reviewed-by:
-
Frederic Weisbecker authored
cpu_idle() is called on the boot CPU by the init code with preemption disabled. But the cpu_idle() function in alpha doesn't handle this when it calls schedule() directly. Fix it by converting it into schedule_preempt_disabled(). Also disable preemption before calling cpu_idle() from secondary CPU entry code to stay consistent with this state. Signed-off-by:
-
Silas Boyd-Wickizer authored
If arch/x86/kernel/cpuid.c is a module, a CPU might offline or online between the for_each_online_cpu() loop and the call to register_hotcpu_notifier in cpuid_init or the call to unregister_hotcpu_notifier in cpuid_exit. The potential races can lead to leaks/duplicates, attempts to destroy non-existant devices, or random pointer dereferences. For example, in cpuid_exit if: for_each_online_cpu(cpu) cpuid_device_destroy(cpu); class_destroy(cpuid_class); __unregister_chrdev(CPUID_MAJOR, 0, NR_CPUS, "cpu/cpuid"); <----- CPU onlines unregister_hotcpu_notifier(&cpuid_class_cpu_notifier); the hotcpu notifier will attempt to create a device for the cpuid_class, which the module already destroyed. This fix surrounds for_each_online_cpu and register_hotcpu_notifier or unregister_hotcpu_notifier with get_online_cpus+put_online_cpus. Tested on a VM. Signed-off-by:Silas Boyd-Wickizer <sbw@mit.edu> Signed-off-by:
-
Silas Boyd-Wickizer authored
If arch/x86/kernel/msr.c is a module, a CPU might offline or online between the for_each_online_cpu(i) loop and the call to register_hotcpu_notifier in msr_init or the call to unregister_hotcpu_notifier in msr_exit. The potential races can lead to leaks/duplicates, attempts to destroy non-existant devices, or random pointer dereferences. For example, in msr_init if: for_each_online_cpu(i) { err = msr_device_create(i); if (err != 0) goto out_class; } <----- CPU offlines register_hotcpu_notifier(&msr_class_cpu_notifier); and the CPU never onlines before msr_exit, then the module will never call msr_device_destroy for the associated CPU. This fix surrounds for_each_online_cpu and register_hotcpu_notifier or unregister_hotcpu_notifier with get_online_cpus+put_online_cpus. Tested on a VM. Signed-off-by: -
Peter Zijlstra authored
Rabik and Paul reported two different issues related to the same few lines of code. Rabik's issue is that the nr_uninterruptible migration code is wrong in that he sees artifacts due to this (Rabik please do expand in more detail). Paul's issue is that this code as it stands relies on us using stop_machine() for unplug, we all would like to remove this assumption so that eventually we can remove this stop_machine() usage altogether. The only reason we'd have to migrate nr_uninterruptible is so that we could use for_each_online_cpu() loops in favour of for_each_possible_cpu() loops, however since nr_uninterruptible() is the only such loop and its using possible lets not bother at all. The problem Rabik sees is (probably) caused by the fact that by migrating nr_uninterruptible we screw rq->calc_load_active for both rqs involved. So don't bother with fancy migration schemes (meaning we now have to keep using for_each_possible_cpu()) and instead fold any nr_active delta after we migrate all tasks away to make sure we don't have any skewed nr_active accounting. [ paulmck: Move call to calc_load_migration to CPU_DEAD to avoid miscounting noted by Rakib. ] Reported-by:
Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@gmail.com> Reported-by:
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by:
-
Paul E. McKenney authored
Posting a callback after the CPU_DEAD notifier effectively leaks that callback unless/until that CPU comes back online. Silence is unhelpful when attempting to track down such leaks, so this commit emits a WARN_ON_ONCE() and unconditionally leaks the callback when an offline CPU attempts to register a callback. The rdp->nxttail[RCU_NEXT_TAIL] is set to NULL in the CPU_DEAD notifier and restored in the CPU_UP_PREPARE notifier, allowing _call_rcu() to determine exactly when posting callbacks is illegal. Signed-off-by:
-
Paul E. McKenney authored
Currently, _rcu_barrier() relies on preempt_disable() to prevent any CPU from going offline, which in turn depends on CPU hotplug's use of __stop_machine(). This patch therefore makes _rcu_barrier() use get_online_cpus() to block CPU-hotplug operations. This has the added benefit of removing the need for _rcu_barrier() to adopt callbacks: Because CPU-hotplug operations are excluded, there can be no callbacks to adopt. This commit simplifies the code accordingly. Signed-off-by:
-
Paul E. McKenney authored
The print_cpu_stall_fast_no_hz() function attempts to print -1 when the ->idle_gp_timer is not pending, but unsigned arithmetic causes it to instead print ULONG_MAX, which is 4294967295 on 32-bit systems and 18446744073709551615 on 64-bit systems. Neither of these are the most reader-friendly values, so this commit instead causes "timer not pending" to be printed when ->idle_gp_timer is not pending. Reported-by:
Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Li Zhong authored
TINY_RCU's rcu_idle_enter_common() invokes rcu_sched_qs() in order to inform the RCU core of the quiescent state implied by idle entry. Of course, idle is also an extended quiescent state, so that the call to rcu_sched_qs() speeds up RCU's invoking of any callbacks that might be queued. This speed-up is important when entering into dyntick-idle mode -- if there are no further scheduling-clock interrupts, the callbacks might never be invoked, which could result in a system hang. However, processing callbacks does event tracing, which in turn implies RCU read-side critical sections, which are illegal in extended quiescent states. This patch therefore moves the call to rcu_sched_qs() so that it precedes the point at which we inform lockdep that RCU has entered an extended quiescent state. Signed-off-by:
Li Zhong <zhong@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Michael Wang authored
This patch replaces list_for_each_continue_rcu() with list_for_each_entry_continue_rcu() to save a few lines of code and allow removing list_for_each_continue_rcu(). Signed-off-by:
Michael Wang <wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by:
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Paul E. McKenney authored
The can_stop_idle_tick() function complains if a softirq vector is raised too late in the idle-entry process, presumably in order to prevent dangling softirq invocations from being delayed across the full idle period, which might be indefinitely long -- and if softirq was asserted any later than the call to this function, such a delay might well happen. However, RCU needs to be able to use softirq to stop idle entry in order to be able to drain RCU callbacks from the current CPU, which in turn enables faster entry into dyntick-idle mode, which in turn reduces power consumption. Because RCU takes this action at a well-defined point in the idle-entry path, it is safe for RCU to take this approach. This commit therefore silences the error message that is sometimes produced when the going-idle CPU suddenly finds that it has an RCU_SOFTIRQ to process. The error message will continue to be issued for other softirq vectors. Reported-by:
Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Paul E. McKenney authored
The use of raw_local_irq_save() is unnecessary, given that local_irq_save() really does disable interrupts. Also, it appears to interfere with lockdep. Therefore, this commit moves to local_irq_save(). Reported-by:
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Paul E. McKenney authored
The first memory barrier in __call_rcu() is supposed to order any updates done beforehand by the caller against the actual queuing of the callback. However, the second memory barrier (which is intended to order incrementing the queue lengths before queuing the callback) is also between the caller's updates and the queuing of the callback. The second memory barrier can therefore serve both purposes. This commit therefore removes the first memory barrier. Signed-off-by:
-
Paul E. McKenney authored
If a given CPU avoids the idle loop but also avoids starting a new RCU grace period for a full minute, RCU can issue spurious RCU CPU stall warnings. This commit fixes this issue by adding a check for ongoing grace period to avoid these spurious stall warnings. Reported-by:
Becky Bruce <bgillbruce@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Paul E. McKenney authored
The print_other_cpu_stall() function accesses a number of rcu_node fields without protection from the ->lock. In theory, this is not a problem because the fields accessed are all integers, but in practice the compiler can get nasty. Therefore, the commit extends the existing critical section to cover the entire loop body. Signed-off-by: -
Paul E. McKenney authored
The rcu_print_detail_task_stall_rnp() function invokes rcu_preempt_blocked_readers_cgp() to verify that there are some preempted RCU readers blocking the current grace period outside of the protection of the rcu_node structure's ->lock. This means that the last blocked reader might exit its RCU read-side critical section and remove itself from the ->blkd_tasks list before the ->lock is acquired, resulting in a segmentation fault when the subsequent code attempts to dereference the now-NULL gp_tasks pointer. This commit therefore moves the test under the lock. This will not have measurable effect on lock contention because this code is invoked only when printing RCU CPU stall warnings, in other words, in the common case, never. Signed-off-by: -
Paul E. McKenney authored
The increment_cpu_stall_ticks() function listed each RCU flavor explicitly, with an ifdef to handle preemptible RCU. This commit therefore applies for_each_rcu_flavor() to save a line of code. Because this commit switches from a code-based enumeration of the flavors of RCU to an rcu_state-list-based enumeration, it is no longer possible to apply __get_cpu_var() to the per-CPU rcu_data structures. We instead use __this_cpu_var() on the rcu_state structure's ->rda field that references the corresponding rcu_data structures. Signed-off-by: -
Paul E. McKenney authored
Commit 1217ed1b (rcu: permit rcu_read_unlock() to be called while holding runqueue locks) made rcu_initiate_boost() restore irq state when releasing the rcu_node structure's ->lock, but failed to update the header comment accordingly. This commit therefore brings the header comment up to date. Signed-off-by:
-
Paul E. McKenney authored
The rcu_implicit_offline_qs() function implicitly assumed that execution would progress predictably when interrupts are disabled, which is of course not guaranteed when running on a hypervisor. Furthermore, this function is short, and is called from one place only in a short function. This commit therefore ensures that the timing is checked before checking the condition, which guarantees correct behavior even given indefinite delays. It also inlines rcu_implicit_offline_qs() into rcu_implicit_dynticks_qs(). Signed-off-by:
-
Paul E. McKenney authored
The rcu_preempt_offline_tasks() moves all tasks queued on a given leaf rcu_node structure to the root rcu_node, which is done when the last CPU corresponding the the leaf rcu_node structure goes offline. Now that RCU-preempt's synchronize_rcu_expedited() implementation blocks CPU-hotplug operations during the initialization of each rcu_node structure's ->boost_tasks pointer, rcu_preempt_offline_tasks() can do a better job of setting the root rcu_node's ->boost_tasks pointer. The key point is that rcu_preempt_offline_tasks() runs as part of the CPU-hotplug process, so that a concurrent synchronize_rcu_expedited() is guaranteed to either have not started on the one hand (in which case there is no boosting on behalf of the expedited grace period) or to be completely initialized on the other (in which case, in the absence of other priority boosting, all ->boost_tasks pointers will be initialized). Therefore, if rcu_preempt_offline_tasks() finds that the ->boost_tasks pointer is equal to the ->exp_tasks pointer, it can be sure that it is correctly placed. In the case where there was boosting ongoing at the time that the synchronize_rcu_expedited() function started, different nodes might start boosting the tasks blocking the expedited grace period at different times. In this mixed case, the root node will either be boosting tasks for the expedited grace period already, or it will start as soon as it gets done boosting for the normal grace period -- but in this latter case, the root node's tasks needed to be boosted in any case. This commit therefore adds a check of the ->boost_tasks pointer against the ->exp_tasks pointer to the list that prevents updating ->boost_tasks. Signed-off-by:
-
Paul E. McKenney authored
There is a need to use RCU from interrupt context, but either before rcu_irq_enter() is called or after rcu_irq_exit() is called. If the interrupt occurs from idle, then lockdep-RCU will complain about such uses, as they appear to be illegal uses of RCU from the idle loop. In other environments, RCU_NONIDLE() could be used to properly protect the use of RCU, but RCU_NONIDLE() currently cannot be invoked except from process context. This commit therefore modifies RCU_NONIDLE() to permit its use more globally. Reported-by:
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by:
-
Paul E. McKenney authored
When rcu_preempt_offline_tasks() clears tasks from a leaf rcu_node structure, it does not NULL out the structure's ->boost_tasks field. This commit therefore fixes this issue. Signed-off-by:
-
Paul E. McKenney authored
Because TINY_RCU's idle detection keys directly off of the nesting level, rather than from a separate variable as in TREE_RCU, the TINY_RCU dyntick-idle tracing on transition to idle must happen before the change to the nesting level. This commit therefore makes this change by passing the desired new value (rather than the old value) of the nesting level in to rcu_idle_enter_common(). [ paulmck: Add fix for wrong-variable bug spotted by Michael Wang <wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>. ] Signed-off-by:
-
Paul E. McKenney authored
There have been some recent bugs that were triggered only when preemptible RCU's __rcu_read_unlock() was preempted just after setting ->rcu_read_lock_nesting to INT_MIN, which is a low-probability event. Therefore, reproducing those bugs (to say nothing of gaining confidence in alleged fixes) was quite difficult. This commit therefore creates a new debug-only RCU kernel config option that forces a short delay in __rcu_read_unlock() to increase the probability of those sorts of bugs occurring. Signed-off-by:
-
Paul E. McKenney authored
When you do something like "t = kthread_run(...)", it is possible that the kthread will start running before the assignment to "t" happens. If the child kthread expects to find a pointer to its task_struct in "t", it will then be fatally disappointed. This commit therefore switches such cases to kthread_create() followed by wake_up_process(), guaranteeing that the assignment happens before the child kthread starts running. Reported-by:
-
Paul E. McKenney authored
Drop a few characters by switching kernel/rcutorture.c from "printk(KERN_ALERT" to "pr_alert(". Signed-off-by: -
Paul E. McKenney authored
The current documentation did not help someone grepping for SRCU to learn that disabling preemption is not a replacement for srcu_read_lock(), so upgrade the documentation to bring this out, not just for SRCU, but also for RCU-bh. Also document the fact that SRCU readers are respected on CPUs executing in user mode, idle CPUs, and even on offline CPUs. Signed-off-by:
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
-
Paul E. McKenney authored
Many rcutorture runs include CPU-hotplug operations in their stress testing. This commit accumulates statistics on the durations of these operations in deference to the recent concern about the overhead and latency of these operations. Signed-off-by:
-
Paul E. McKenney authored
A number of new features have been added to rcutorture over the years, but the defaults have not been updated to include them. This commit therefore turns on a couple of them that have proven helpful and trustworthy, namely periodic progress reports and testing of NO_HZ. Signed-off-by:
-
