- 13 Aug, 2012 22 commits
-
-
Jiri Slaby authored
This has two outcomes: * we give the TTY layer a tty_port * we do not find the info structure every time open is called on that tty Since we take a reference to a port in ->install, we need also ->cleanup to drop that reference. Signed-off-by:
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Acked-by:
Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by:
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
Jiri Slaby authored
This has two outcomes: * we give the TTY layer a tty_port * we do not find the info structure every time open is called on that tty In this case ->install is the only thing we want to do. We do not need ->open at all. See the tty->count > 1 check. And since we take a reference in ->install, we need also ->cleanup to drop the reference to a view. Final note, see that we leave raw3270_find_view in place. It is because views are removed even from module_exit. Signed-off-by:
-
Jiri Slaby authored
This has two outcomes: * we give the TTY layer a tty_port * we do not find the info structure every time open is called on that tty Signed-off-by:
-
Jiri Slaby authored
This has two outcomes: * we give the TTY layer a tty_port * we do not find the info structure every time open is called on that tty Signed-off-by:
-
Jiri Slaby authored
This has two outcomes: * we give the TTY layer a tty_port * we do not find the info structure every time open is called on that tty Signed-off-by:
-
Jiri Slaby authored
This has two outcomes: * we give the TTY layer a tty_port * we do not find the info structure every time open is called on that tty The "tty->port = port" assignment is not needed anymore since it happens in tty_port_install implicitly. Signed-off-by:
-
Jiri Slaby authored
This has two outcomes: * we give the TTY layer a tty_port * we do not find the info structure every time open is called on that tty Signed-off-by:
-
Jiri Slaby authored
raw3215[line] is set in probe, but not unset in remove. This will lead to random crashes if the device is removed and the corresponding tty opened later. open would dereference freed memory. So set raw3215[line] to NULL in remove to fix that. Signed-off-by:
-
Jiri Slaby authored
Every tty driver needs tty_port for each line. So let us add one to nfcon too. And link it so that the tty layer knows about it. Signed-off-by:
-
Jiri Slaby authored
This allows us to provide the tty layer with information about tty_port for each link. We also provide a tty_port for the service port. For this one we allow only ioctl, so this is pretty ugly. Signed-off-by:
-
Jiri Slaby authored
* use <tab> for indentation * add KERN_* to printks * no more assignments in if's like if ((rc = function())) Signed-off-by:
-
Jiri Slaby authored
This allows us to provide the tty layer with information about tty_port for each link. And it also allows us to get rid of the remove_device loop in synclink_cs_exit because we had to reorder pcmcia and tty driver registration in init. This was because we need to have serial_driver initialized when calling tty_port_register_device from pcmcia ->probe. Signed-off-by:
-
Jiri Slaby authored
We will need to change the order of tty and pcmcia drivers initializations (see the reason later in this series). And the fail path handling is currently performed in a separate function that as well takes care of proper deinitialization in module_exit. It is hard to read and will need to be adjusted by our changes anyway. Instead, get rid of this helper function and do the fail paths handling directly in the init function. (And move the body of the function to module_exit.) Signed-off-by:
-
Jiri Slaby authored
So now for those drivers that can use neither tty_port_install nor tty_port_register_driver but still have tty_port available before tty_register_driver we use newly added tty_port_link_device. The rest of the drivers that still do not provide tty_struct <-> tty_port link will have to be converted to implement tty->ops->install. Signed-off-by:
-
Jiri Slaby authored
This is for those drivers which do not have dynamic device creation (do not call tty_port_register_device) and do not want to implement tty->ops->install (will not call tty_port_install). They still have to provide the link somehow though. And this newly added function is exactly to serve that purpose. Signed-off-by:
-
Jiri Slaby authored
I forgot to document tty_port_register_device and tty_port_install when they were added. Fix it now. Signed-off-by:
-
Jiri Slaby authored
This looks like it was a mistake not to create device nodes for these drivers. Let us create them from now on. It will be necessary to call tty_register_device some way, either by tty_register_driver implicitly or to call tty_register_device proper. Signed-off-by:
-
Jiri Slaby authored
Currently we have no way to assign tty->port while performing tty installation. There are two ways to provide the link tty_struct => tty_port. Either by calling tty_port_install from tty->ops->install or tty_port_register_device called instead of tty_register_device when the device is being set up after connected. In this patch we modify most of the drivers to do the latter. When the drivers use tty_register_device and we have tty_port already, we switch to tty_port_register_device. So we have the tty_struct => tty_port link for free for those. Signed-off-by:
-
Jiri Slaby authored
We need the /dev/ node not to be available before we call tty_register_device. Otherwise we might race with open and tty_struct->port might not be available at that time. This is not an issue now, but would be a problem after "TTY: use tty_port_register_device" is applied. Signed-off-by:
-
Jiri Slaby authored
This allows drivers like ttyprintk to avoid hacks to create an unnumbered node in /dev. It used to set TTY_DRIVER_DYNAMIC_DEV in flags and call device_create on its own. That is incorrect, because TTY_DRIVER_DYNAMIC_DEV may be set only if tty_register_device is called explicitly. Signed-off-by:
-
Jiri Slaby authored
So now, that we have flags and know everything needed, keep a promise and move all the tables and ports allocation from tty_register_driver to tty_alloc_driver. Not only that it makes sense, but we need this for tty_port_link_device which needs tty_driver->ports but is to be called before tty_register_driver. Signed-off-by:
-
Jiri Slaby authored
Switch to the new driver allocation interface, as this is one of the special call-sites. Here, we need TTY_DRIVER_DYNAMIC_ALLOC to not allocate tty_driver->ports, cdevs and potentially other structures because we reserve too many lines in pty. Instead, it provides the tty_port<->tty_struct link in tty->ops->install already. Signed-off-by:
-
- 10 Aug, 2012 18 commits
-
-
Jiri Slaby authored
We need to allow drivers that use neither tty_port_install nor tty_port_register_device to link a tty_port to a tty somehow. To avoid a race with open, this has to be performed before tty_register_device. But currently tty_driver->ports is allocated even in tty_register_device because we do not know whether this is the PTY driver. The PTY driver is special here due to an excessive count of lines it declares to handle. We cannot handle tty_ports there this way. To circumvent this, we start passing tty_driver flags to alloc_tty_driver already and we create tty_alloc_driver for this purpose. There we can allocate tty_driver->ports and do all the magic between tty_alloc_driver and tty_register_device. Later we will introduce tty_port_link_device function for that purpose. All drivers should eventually switch to this new tty driver allocation interface. Signed-off-by:
-
Jiri Slaby authored
On module unload, in tty3270_exit, we forgot to free the tty driver. Add there a call to put_tty_driver. Signed-off-by:
-
Jiri Slaby authored
After tty_register_driver is called, it is too late to initialize a guy with which we operate in open. When a process already called open(2) on that node, the structures may be in use uninitialized. Move the initialization prior to tty_register_driver. Signed-off-by:
-
Jiri Slaby authored
If a user provides a buffer larger than a tty->write_buf chunk and passes '\r' at the end of the buffer, we touch an out-of-bound memory. Add a check there to prevent this. Signed-off-by:
-
Jiri Slaby authored
When the tty_printk driver fails to create a node in sysfs, the system crashes. It is because the driver registers a tty driver and frees it without deregistering it first. The fix is easy: add a call to tty_unregister_driver to the fail path. This is very unlikely to happen in usual environment => no need for stable. The crash occurs at some place where we iterate over tty drivers first. It may look like this: BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffffffffffffff84 IP: [<ffffffff81278d56>] tty_open+0xd6/0x650 PGD 1a0d067 PUD 1a0e067 PMD 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP Modules linked in: CPU 0 Pid: 1183, comm: boot.localnet Tainted: G W 3.5.0-rc7-next-20120716+ #369 Bochs Bochs RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff81278d56>] [<ffffffff81278d56>] tty_open+0xd6/0x650 RSP: 0018:ffff8800162b3b98 EFLAGS: 00010207 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff880016ba6200 RCX: 0000000000002208 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00000000000000d0 RDI: ffffffff81a35080 RBP: ffff8800162b3c08 R08: ffffffff81276f42 R09: 0000000000400040 R10: ffff8800161dc005 R11: ffff8800188ee048 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: ffffffffffffff58 R14: 0000000000400040 R15: 0000000000008000 FS: 00007f3684abd700(0000) GS:ffff880018e00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: ffffffffffffff84 CR3: 000000001503e000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Process boot.localnet (pid: 1183, threadinfo ffff8800162b2000, task ffff8800188c5880) Stack: ffff8800162b3c08 ffffffff81363d63 ffffffff81a62940 ffff8800189b4e88 ffff8800188c5880 ffffffff81123180 0000000000000000 ffffffff18b20600 0000000000000000 ffff8800189b4e88 ffff880016ba6200 ffff880018b20600 Call Trace: [<ffffffff81363d63>] ? kobj_lookup+0x103/0x160 [<ffffffff81123180>] ? mount_fs+0x110/0x110 [<ffffffff81123a9c>] chrdev_open+0x9c/0x1a0 [<ffffffff81123a00>] ? cdev_put+0x30/0x30 [<ffffffff8111de76>] do_dentry_open.isra.19+0x1e6/0x270 [<ffffffff8111df65>] finish_open+0x65/0xa0 [<ffffffff8112dc9e>] do_last.isra.52+0x26e/0xd80 [<ffffffff8112b163>] ? inode_permission+0x13/0x50 [<ffffffff8112b203>] ? link_path_walk+0x63/0x940 [<ffffffff8112e85b>] path_openat+0xab/0x3d0 [<ffffffff8112ef5d>] do_filp_open+0x3d/0xa0 [<ffffffff8113ba72>] ? alloc_fd+0xd2/0x120 [<ffffffff8111eee3>] do_sys_open+0xf3/0x1d0 [<ffffffff8111efdc>] sys_open+0x1c/0x20 [<ffffffff815b5fe2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Signed-off-by:
-
Jiri Slaby authored
For many cards, this saves some IO space because interrupt status port has precedence over the rest of ports on the card. Hence it can be mapped to a hole in I/O ports. Here we add a kernel parameter which allows that if a user wants to. But they need to explicitly enable it by a module parameter. Signed-off-by:
-
Jiri Slaby authored
So now we have enough of tty_ports, so we can signal the TTY layer to use them by tty_port_register_device. The upside is that we look like we can introduce tty_port_easy_open and put it directly as tty_operations->open to drivers doing nothing in open and using tty_port_register_device. Because the easy open can obtain a tty_port rather easily from a tty now. Heh, what a nice by-product. Signed-off-by:
-
Jiri Slaby authored
We now have *one* tty_port for both TTYs. How this was supposed to work? Change it to have a tty_port for each of TTYs. Signed-off-by:
-
Jiri Slaby authored
Fail paths in ->probe and pti_init are incomplete. Fix that by adding proper clean-up paths. Note that we used to leak tty_driver on module unload. This is fixed here too. tty_unregister_driver needs not retval checking, so remove that. Signed-off-by:
-
Jiri Slaby authored
Currently, probe initializes some parts. Then, some of them are unwound in ->remove, some in module_exit. Let us do the opposite of whole ->probe in ->remove. Signed-off-by:
-
Jiri Slaby authored
The function is lost somewhere in the forest. Move it to have it along with probe and other pci_driver stuff. Signed-off-by:
-
Jiri Slaby authored
Ioremap space is different to iomap. ->probe function uses ioremap, but ->remove calls pci_iounmap. That one is illegal. Fix that by using iounmap. Signed-off-by:
-
Jiri Slaby authored
As we set drvdata unconditionally in ->probe, we need not check if it is NULL. Let us remove the check. Signed-off-by:
-
Jiri Slaby authored
It is annotated as __devinitconst. Despite the annotation is useless in most cases, const keyword is misssing there. So we are placing non-const data into rodata section. Fix that now. Signed-off-by:
-
Jiri Slaby authored
We need to link a port to a tty in install. And since dlci is allocated even in open, we need to create gsmtty_install, allocate dlci there and create also the link. Signed-off-by:
-
Jiri Slaby authored
tty_struct->termios is no longer a pointer. This was changed recently by "tty: move the termios object into the tty". But 68328serial was not changed, so we now have a compilation error: 68328serial.c: In function 'change_speed': 68328serial.c:518:22: error: invalid type argument of '->' (have 'struct ktermios') 68328serial.c: In function 'rs_set_ldisc': 68328serial.c:620:31: error: invalid type argument of '->' (have 'struct ktermios') 68328serial.c: In function 'rs_set_termios': 68328serial.c:988:20: error: invalid type argument of '->' (have 'struct ktermios') Fix that now. Signed-off-by:
-
Jiri Slaby authored
In case alloc_tty_struct fails in pty_common_install, we pass NULL to free_tty_struct. This is invalid as the function is not ready to cope with that. And even if it was, it is not nice to do that anyway. Signed-off-by:
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Jaeden Amero authored
When PARMRK is set and large transfers of characters that will get marked are being received, n_tty could drop data silently (i.e. without reporting any error to the client). This is because characters have the potential to take up to three bytes in the line discipline (when they get marked with parity or framing errors), but the amount of free space reported to tty_buffer flush_to_ldisc (via tty->receive_room) is based on the pre-marked data size. With this patch, the n_tty layer will no longer assume that each byte will only take up one byte in the line discipline. Instead, it will make an overly conservative estimate that each byte will take up three bytes in the line discipline when PARMRK is set. Signed-off-by:
Jaeden Amero <jaeden.amero@ni.com> Acked-by:
-
