1. 31 Dec, 2015 2 commits
    • Kent Overstreet's avatar
      bcache: Add a cond_resched() call to gc · c5f1e5ad
      Kent Overstreet authored
      Signed-off-by: default avatarTakashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
      Tested-by: default avatarEric Wheeler <bcache@linux.ewheeler.net>
      Cc: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
      c5f1e5ad
    • Zheng Liu's avatar
      bcache: fix a livelock when we cause a huge number of cache misses · 2ef9ccbf
      Zheng Liu authored
      Subject :	[PATCH v2] bcache: fix a livelock in btree lock
      Date :	Wed, 25 Feb 2015 20:32:09 +0800 (02/25/2015 04:32:09 AM)
      
      This commit tries to fix a livelock in bcache.  This livelock might
      happen when we causes a huge number of cache misses simultaneously.
      
      When we get a cache miss, bcache will execute the following path.
      
      ->cached_dev_make_request()
        ->cached_dev_read()
          ->cached_lookup()
            ->bch->btree_map_keys()
              ->btree_root()  <------------------------
                ->bch_btree_map_keys_recurse()        |
                  ->cache_lookup_fn()                 |
                    ->cached_dev_cache_miss()         |
                      ->bch_btree_insert_check_key() -|
                        [If btree->seq is not equal to seq + 1, we should return
                         EINTR and traverse btree again.]
      
      In bch_btree_insert_check_key() function we first need to check upgrade
      flag (op->lock == -1), and when this flag is true we need to release
      read btree->lock and try to take write btree->lock.  During taking and
      releasing this write lock, btree->seq will be monotone increased in
      order to prevent other threads modify this in cache miss (see btree.h:74).
      But if there are some cache misses caused by some requested, we could
      meet a livelock because btree->seq is always changed by others.  Thus no
      one can make progress.
      
      This commit will try to take write btree->lock if it encounters a race
      when we traverse btree.  Although it sacrifice the scalability but we
      can ensure that only one can modify the btree.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarZheng Liu <wenqing.lz@taobao.com>
      Tested-by: default avatarJoshua Schmid <jschmid@suse.com>
      Tested-by: default avatarEric Wheeler <bcache@linux.ewheeler.net>
      Cc: Joshua Schmid <jschmid@suse.com>
      Cc: Zhu Yanhai <zhu.yanhai@gmail.com>
      Cc: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
      2ef9ccbf
  2. 23 Dec, 2015 1 commit
  3. 22 Dec, 2015 1 commit
    • Shraddha Barke's avatar
      block: sx8.c: Replace timeval with ktime_t · 8182503d
      Shraddha Barke authored
      32-bit systems using 'struct timeval' will break in the year 2038,
      in order to avoid that replace the code with more appropriate types.
      This patch replaces timeval with 64 bit ktime_t which is y2038 safe.
      Since st->timestamp is only interested in seconds, directly using
      time64_t here. Function ktime_get_seconds is used since it uses
      monotonic instead of real time and thus will not cause overflow.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarShraddha Barke <shraddha.6596@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
      8182503d
  4. 25 Nov, 2015 36 commits