Skip to content

L
linux
Switch branch/tag
  1. 27 Sep, 2019 2 commits
    • Qu Wenruo's avatar
      btrfs: qgroup: Fix reserved data space leak if we have multiple reserve calls · d4e20494
      Qu Wenruo authored 
      [BUG]
The following script can cause btrfs qgroup data space leak:

  mkfs.btrfs -f $dev
  mount $dev -o nospace_cache $mnt

  btrfs subv create $mnt/subv
  btrfs quota en $mnt
  btrfs quota rescan -w $mnt
  btrfs qgroup limit 128m $mnt/subv

  for (( i = 0; i < 3; i++)); do
          # Create 3 64M holes for latter fallocate to fail
          truncate -s 192m $mnt/subv/file
          xfs_io -c "pwrite 64m 4k" $mnt/subv/file > /dev/null
          xfs_io -c "pwrite 128m 4k" $mnt/subv/file > /dev/null
          sync

          # it's supposed to fail, and each failure will leak at least 64M
          # data space
          xfs_io -f -c "falloc 0 192m" $mnt/subv/file &> /dev/null
          rm $mnt/subv/file
          sync
  done

  # Shouldn't fail after we removed the file
  xfs_io -f -c "falloc 0 64m" $mnt/subv/file

[CAUSE]
Btrfs qgroup data reserve code allow multiple reservations to happen on
a single extent_changeset:
E.g:
	btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data(inode, &data_reserved, 0, SZ_1M);
	btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data(inode, &data_reserved, SZ_1M, SZ_2M);
	btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data(inode, &data_reserved, 0, SZ_4M);

Btrfs qgroup code has its internal tracking to make sure we don't
double-reserve in above example.

The only pattern utilizing this feature is in the main while loop of
btrfs_fallocate() function.

However btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data()'s error handling has a bug in that
on error it clears all ranges in the io_tree with EXTENT_QGROUP_RESERVED
flag but doesn't free previously reserved bytes.

This bug has a two fold effect:
- Clearing EXTENT_QGROUP_RESERVED ranges
  This is the correct behavior, but it prevents
  btrfs_qgroup_check_reserved_leak() to catch the leakage as the
  detector is purely EXTENT_QGROUP_RESERVED flag based.

- Leak the previously reserved data bytes.

The bug manifests when N calls to btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data are made and
the last one fails, leaking space reserved in the previous ones.

[FIX]
Also free previously reserved data bytes when btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data
fails.

Fixes: 52472553 ("btrfs: qgroup: Introduce btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data function")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: default avatarQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      d4e20494
    • Qu Wenruo's avatar
      btrfs: qgroup: Fix the wrong target io_tree when freeing reserved data space · bab32fc0
      Qu Wenruo authored 
      [BUG]
Under the following case with qgroup enabled, if some error happened
after we have reserved delalloc space, then in error handling path, we
could cause qgroup data space leakage:

From btrfs_truncate_block() in inode.c:

	ret = btrfs_delalloc_reserve_space(inode, &data_reserved,
					   block_start, blocksize);
	if (ret)
		goto out;

 again:
	page = find_or_create_page(mapping, index, mask);
	if (!page) {
		btrfs_delalloc_release_space(inode, data_reserved,
					     block_start, blocksize, true);
		btrfs_delalloc_release_extents(BTRFS_I(inode), blocksize, true);
		ret = -ENOMEM;
		goto out;
	}

[CAUSE]
In the above case, btrfs_delalloc_reserve_space() will call
btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data() and mark the io_tree range with
EXTENT_QGROUP_RESERVED flag.

In the error handling path, we have the following call stack:
btrfs_delalloc_release_space()
|- btrfs_free_reserved_data_space()
   |- btrsf_qgroup_free_data()
      |- __btrfs_qgroup_release_data(reserved=@reserved, free=1)
         |- qgroup_free_reserved_data(reserved=@reserved)
            |- clear_record_extent_bits();
            |- freed += changeset.bytes_changed;

However due to a completion bug, qgroup_free_reserved_data() will clear
EXTENT_QGROUP_RESERVED flag in BTRFS_I(inode)->io_failure_tree, other
than the correct BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree.
Since io_failure_tree is never marked with that flag,
btrfs_qgroup_free_data() will not free any data reserved space at all,
causing a leakage.

This type of error handling can only be triggered by errors outside of
qgroup code. So EDQUOT error from qgroup can't trigger it.

[FIX]
Fix the wrong target io_tree.
Reported-by: default avatarJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Fixes: bc42bda2 ("btrfs: qgroup: Fix qgroup reserved space underflow by only freeing reserved ranges")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Reviewed-by: default avatarNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      bab32fc0
  3. 25 Sep, 2019 2 commits
    • Qu Wenruo's avatar
      btrfs: Fix a regression which we can't convert to SINGLE profile · fab27359
      Qu Wenruo authored 
      [BUG]
With v5.3 kernel, we can't convert to SINGLE profile:

  # btrfs balance start -f -dconvert=single $mnt
  ERROR: error during balancing '/mnt/btrfs': Invalid argument
  # dmesg -t | tail
  validate_convert_profile: data profile=0x1000000000000 allowed=0x20 is_valid=1 final=0x1000000000000 ret=1
  BTRFS error (device dm-3): balance: invalid convert data profile single

[CAUSE]
With the extra debug output added, it shows that the @allowed bit is
lacking the special in-memory only SINGLE profile bit.

Thus we fail at that (profile & ~allowed) check.

This regression is caused by commit 081db89b ("btrfs: use raid_attr
to get allowed profiles for balance conversion") and the fact that we
don't use any bit to indicate SINGLE profile on-disk, but uses special
in-memory only bit to help distinguish different profiles.

[FIX]
Add that BTRFS_AVAIL_ALLOC_BIT_SINGLE to @allowed, so the code should be
the same as it was and fix the regression.
Reported-by: default avatarChris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com>
Fixes: 081db89b ("btrfs: use raid_attr to get allowed profiles for balance conversion")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.3+
Reviewed-by: default avatarAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      fab27359
    • Qu Wenruo's avatar
      btrfs: relocation: fix use-after-free on dead relocation roots · 1fac4a54
      Qu Wenruo authored 
      [BUG]
One user reported a reproducible KASAN report about use-after-free:

  BTRFS info (device sdi1): balance: start -dvrange=1256811659264..1256811659265
  BTRFS info (device sdi1): relocating block group 1256811659264 flags data|raid0
  ==================================================================
  BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in btrfs_init_reloc_root+0x2cd/0x340 [btrfs]
  Write of size 8 at addr ffff88856f671710 by task kworker/u24:10/261579

  CPU: 2 PID: 261579 Comm: kworker/u24:10 Tainted: P           OE     5.2.11-arch1-1-kasan #4
  Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./X99 Extreme4, BIOS P3.80 04/06/2018
  Workqueue: btrfs-endio-write btrfs_endio_write_helper [btrfs]
  Call Trace:
   dump_stack+0x7b/0xba
   print_address_description+0x6c/0x22e
   ? btrfs_init_reloc_root+0x2cd/0x340 [btrfs]
   __kasan_report.cold+0x1b/0x3b
   ? btrfs_init_reloc_root+0x2cd/0x340 [btrfs]
   kasan_report+0x12/0x17
   __asan_report_store8_noabort+0x17/0x20
   btrfs_init_reloc_root+0x2cd/0x340 [btrfs]
   record_root_in_trans+0x2a0/0x370 [btrfs]
   btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0xf4/0x140 [btrfs]
   start_transaction+0x1ab/0xe90 [btrfs]
   btrfs_join_transaction+0x1d/0x20 [btrfs]
   btrfs_finish_ordered_io+0x7bf/0x18a0 [btrfs]
   ? lock_repin_lock+0x400/0x400
   ? __kmem_cache_shutdown.cold+0x140/0x1ad
   ? btrfs_unlink_subvol+0x9b0/0x9b0 [btrfs]
   finish_ordered_fn+0x15/0x20 [btrfs]
   normal_work_helper+0x1bd/0xca0 [btrfs]
   ? process_one_work+0x819/0x1720
   ? kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20
   btrfs_endio_write_helper+0x12/0x20 [btrfs]
   process_one_work+0x8c9/0x1720
   ? pwq_dec_nr_in_flight+0x2f0/0x2f0
   ? worker_thread+0x1d9/0x1030
   worker_thread+0x98/0x1030
   kthread+0x2bb/0x3b0
   ? process_one_work+0x1720/0x1720
   ? kthread_park+0x120/0x120
   ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40

  Allocated by task 369692:
   __kasan_kmalloc.part.0+0x44/0xc0
   __kasan_kmalloc.constprop.0+0xba/0xc0
   kasan_kmalloc+0x9/0x10
   kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x138/0x260
   btrfs_read_tree_root+0x92/0x360 [btrfs]
   btrfs_read_fs_root+0x10/0xb0 [btrfs]
   create_reloc_root+0x47d/0xa10 [btrfs]
   btrfs_init_reloc_root+0x1e2/0x340 [btrfs]
   record_root_in_trans+0x2a0/0x370 [btrfs]
   btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0xf4/0x140 [btrfs]
   start_transaction+0x1ab/0xe90 [btrfs]
   btrfs_start_transaction+0x1e/0x20 [btrfs]
   __btrfs_prealloc_file_range+0x1c2/0xa00 [btrfs]
   btrfs_prealloc_file_range+0x13/0x20 [btrfs]
   prealloc_file_extent_cluster+0x29f/0x570 [btrfs]
   relocate_file_extent_cluster+0x193/0xc30 [btrfs]
   relocate_data_extent+0x1f8/0x490 [btrfs]
   relocate_block_group+0x600/0x1060 [btrfs]
   btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x3a0/0xa00 [btrfs]
   btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x9e/0x180 [btrfs]
   btrfs_balance+0x14e4/0x2fc0 [btrfs]
   btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x47f/0x640 [btrfs]
   btrfs_ioctl+0x119d/0x8380 [btrfs]
   do_vfs_ioctl+0x9f5/0x1060
   ksys_ioctl+0x67/0x90
   __x64_sys_ioctl+0x73/0xb0
   do_syscall_64+0xa5/0x370
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

  Freed by task 369692:
   __kasan_slab_free+0x14f/0x210
   kasan_slab_free+0xe/0x10
   kfree+0xd8/0x270
   btrfs_drop_snapshot+0x154c/0x1eb0 [btrfs]
   clean_dirty_subvols+0x227/0x340 [btrfs]
   relocate_block_group+0x972/0x1060 [btrfs]
   btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x3a0/0xa00 [btrfs]
   btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x9e/0x180 [btrfs]
   btrfs_balance+0x14e4/0x2fc0 [btrfs]
   btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x47f/0x640 [btrfs]
   btrfs_ioctl+0x119d/0x8380 [btrfs]
   do_vfs_ioctl+0x9f5/0x1060
   ksys_ioctl+0x67/0x90
   __x64_sys_ioctl+0x73/0xb0
   do_syscall_64+0xa5/0x370
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

  The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff88856f671100
   which belongs to the cache kmalloc-4k of size 4096
  The buggy address is located 1552 bytes inside of
   4096-byte region [ffff88856f671100, ffff88856f672100)
  The buggy address belongs to the page:
  page:ffffea0015bd9c00 refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:ffff88864400e600 index:0x0 compound_mapcount: 0
  flags: 0x2ffff0000010200(slab|head)
  raw: 02ffff0000010200 dead000000000100 dead000000000200 ffff88864400e600
  raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000070007 00000001ffffffff 0000000000000000
  page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected

  Memory state around the buggy address:
   ffff88856f671600: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
   ffff88856f671680: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
  >ffff88856f671700: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
                           ^
   ffff88856f671780: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
   ffff88856f671800: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
  ==================================================================
  BTRFS info (device sdi1): 1 enospc errors during balance
  BTRFS info (device sdi1): balance: ended with status: -28

[CAUSE]
The problem happens when finish_ordered_io() get called with balance
still running, while the reloc root of that subvolume is already dead.
(Tree is swap already done, but tree not yet deleted for possible qgroup
usage.)

That means root->reloc_root still exists, but that reloc_root can be
under btrfs_drop_snapshot(), thus we shouldn't access it.

The following race could cause the use-after-free problem:

                CPU1              |                CPU2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                  | relocate_block_group()
                                  | |- unset_reloc_control(rc)
                                  | |- btrfs_commit_transaction()
btrfs_finish_ordered_io()         | |- clean_dirty_subvols()
|- btrfs_join_transaction()       |    |
   |- record_root_in_trans()      |    |
      |- btrfs_init_reloc_root()  |    |
         |- if (root->reloc_root) |    |
         |                        |    |- root->reloc_root = NULL
         |                        |    |- btrfs_drop_snapshot(reloc_root);
         |- reloc_root->last_trans|
                 = trans->transid |
	    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
            Use after free

[FIX]
Fix it by the following modifications:

- Test if the root has dead reloc tree before accessing root->reloc_root
  If the root has BTRFS_ROOT_DEAD_RELOC_TREE, then we don't need to
  create or update root->reloc_tree

- Clear the BTRFS_ROOT_DEAD_RELOC_TREE flag until we have fully dropped
  reloc tree
  To co-operate with above modification, so as long as
  BTRFS_ROOT_DEAD_RELOC_TREE is still set, we won't try to re-create
  reloc tree at record_root_in_trans().
Reported-by: default avatarCebtenzzre <cebtenzzre@gmail.com>
Fixes: d2311e69 ("btrfs: relocation: Delay reloc tree deletion after merge_reloc_roots")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.1+
Reviewed-by: default avatarJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      1fac4a54
  5. 24 Sep, 2019 4 commits
    • Filipe Manana's avatar
      Btrfs: fix race setting up and completing qgroup rescan workers · 13fc1d27
      Filipe Manana authored 
      There is a race between setting up a qgroup rescan worker and completing
a qgroup rescan worker that can lead to callers of the qgroup rescan wait
ioctl to either not wait for the rescan worker to complete or to hang
forever due to missing wake ups. The following diagram shows a sequence
of steps that illustrates the race.

        CPU 1                                                         CPU 2                                  CPU 3

 btrfs_ioctl_quota_rescan()
  btrfs_qgroup_rescan()
   qgroup_rescan_init()
    mutex_lock(&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_lock)
    spin_lock(&fs_info->qgroup_lock)

    fs_info->qgroup_flags |=
      BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_RESCAN

    init_completion(
      &fs_info->qgroup_rescan_completion)

    fs_info->qgroup_rescan_running = true

    mutex_unlock(&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_lock)
    spin_unlock(&fs_info->qgroup_lock)

    btrfs_init_work()
     --> starts the worker

                                                        btrfs_qgroup_rescan_worker()
                                                         mutex_lock(&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_lock)

                                                         fs_info->qgroup_flags &=
                                                           ~BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_RESCAN

                                                         mutex_unlock(&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_lock)

                                                         starts transaction, updates qgroup status
                                                         item, etc

                                                                                                           btrfs_ioctl_quota_rescan()
                                                                                                            btrfs_qgroup_rescan()
                                                                                                             qgroup_rescan_init()
                                                                                                              mutex_lock(&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_lock)
                                                                                                              spin_lock(&fs_info->qgroup_lock)

                                                                                                              fs_info->qgroup_flags |=
                                                                                                                BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_RESCAN

                                                                                                              init_completion(
                                                                                                                &fs_info->qgroup_rescan_completion)

                                                                                                              fs_info->qgroup_rescan_running = true

                                                                                                              mutex_unlock(&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_lock)
                                                                                                              spin_unlock(&fs_info->qgroup_lock)

                                                                                                              btrfs_init_work()
                                                                                                               --> starts another worker

                                                         mutex_lock(&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_lock)

                                                         fs_info->qgroup_rescan_running = false

                                                         mutex_unlock(&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_lock)

							 complete_all(&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_completion)

Before the rescan worker started by the task at CPU 3 completes, if
another task calls btrfs_ioctl_quota_rescan(), it will get -EINPROGRESS
because the flag BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_RESCAN is set at
fs_info->qgroup_flags, which is expected and correct behaviour.

However if other task calls btrfs_ioctl_quota_rescan_wait() before the
rescan worker started by the task at CPU 3 completes, it will return
immediately without waiting for the new rescan worker to complete,
because fs_info->qgroup_rescan_running is set to false by CPU 2.

This race is making test case btrfs/171 (from fstests) to fail often:

  btrfs/171 9s ... - output mismatch (see /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//btrfs/171.out.bad)
      --- tests/btrfs/171.out     2018-09-16 21:30:48.505104287 +0100
      +++ /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//btrfs/171.out.bad      2019-09-19 02:01:36.938486039 +0100
      @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
       QA output created by 171
      +ERROR: quota rescan failed: Operation now in progress
       Silence is golden
      ...
      (Run 'diff -u /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/tests/btrfs/171.out /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//btrfs/171.out.bad'  to see the entire diff)

That is because the test calls the btrfs-progs commands "qgroup quota
rescan -w", "qgroup assign" and "qgroup remove" in a sequence that makes
calls to the rescan start ioctl fail with -EINPROGRESS (note the "btrfs"
commands 'qgroup assign' and 'qgroup remove' often call the rescan start
ioctl after calling the qgroup assign ioctl,
btrfs_ioctl_qgroup_assign()), since previous waits didn't actually wait
for a rescan worker to complete.

Another problem the race can cause is missing wake ups for waiters,
since the call to complete_all() happens outside a critical section and
after clearing the flag BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_RESCAN. In the sequence
diagram above, if we have a waiter for the first rescan task (executed
by CPU 2), then fs_info->qgroup_rescan_completion.wait is not empty, and
if after the rescan worker clears BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_RESCAN and
before it calls complete_all() against
fs_info->qgroup_rescan_completion, the task at CPU 3 calls
init_completion() against fs_info->qgroup_rescan_completion which
re-initilizes its wait queue to an empty queue, therefore causing the
rescan worker at CPU 2 to call complete_all() against an empty queue,
never waking up the task waiting for that rescan worker.

Fix this by clearing BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_RESCAN and setting
fs_info->qgroup_rescan_running to false in the same critical section,
delimited by the mutex fs_info->qgroup_rescan_lock, as well as doing the
call to complete_all() in that same critical section. This gives the
protection needed to avoid rescan wait ioctl callers not waiting for a
running rescan worker and the lost wake ups problem, since setting that
rescan flag and boolean as well as initializing the wait queue is done
already in a critical section delimited by that mutex (at
qgroup_rescan_init()).

Fixes: 57254b6e ("Btrfs: add ioctl to wait for qgroup rescan completion")
Fixes: d2c609b8 ("btrfs: properly track when rescan worker is running")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: default avatarJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      13fc1d27
    • Filipe Manana's avatar
      Btrfs: fix missing error return if writeback for extent buffer never started · 0607eb1d
      Filipe Manana authored 
      If lock_extent_buffer_for_io() fails, it returns a negative value, but its
caller btree_write_cache_pages() ignores such error. This means that a
call to flush_write_bio(), from lock_extent_buffer_for_io(), might have
failed. We should make btree_write_cache_pages() notice such error values
and stop immediatelly, making sure filemap_fdatawrite_range() returns an
error to the transaction commit path. A failure from flush_write_bio()
should also result in the endio callback end_bio_extent_buffer_writepage()
being invoked, which sets the BTRFS_FS_*_ERR bits appropriately, so that
there's no risk a transaction or log commit doesn't catch a writeback
failure.
Reviewed-by: default avatarJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      0607eb1d
    • Dennis Zhou's avatar
      btrfs: adjust dirty_metadata_bytes after writeback failure of extent buffer · eb5b64f1
      Dennis Zhou authored 
      Before, if a eb failed to write out, we would end up triggering a
BUG_ON(). As of f4340622 ("btrfs: extent_io: Move the BUG_ON() in
flush_write_bio() one level up"), we no longer BUG_ON(), so we should
make life consistent and add back the unwritten bytes to
dirty_metadata_bytes.

Fixes: f4340622 ("btrfs: extent_io: Move the BUG_ON() in flush_write_bio() one level up")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.2+
Reviewed-by: default avatarFilipe Manana <fdmanana@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDennis Zhou <dennis@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      eb5b64f1
    • Filipe Manana's avatar
      Btrfs: fix selftests failure due to uninitialized i_mode in test inodes · 9f7fec0b
      Filipe Manana authored 
      Some of the self tests create a test inode, setup some extents and then do
calls to btrfs_get_extent() to test that the corresponding extent maps
exist and are correct. However btrfs_get_extent(), since the 5.2 merge
window, now errors out when it finds a regular or prealloc extent for an
inode that does not correspond to a regular file (its ->i_mode is not
S_IFREG). This causes the self tests to fail sometimes, specially when
KASAN, slub_debug and page poisoning are enabled:

  $ modprobe btrfs
  modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'btrfs': Invalid argument

  $ dmesg
  [ 9414.691648] Btrfs loaded, crc32c=crc32c-intel, debug=on, assert=on, integrity-checker=on, ref-verify=on
  [ 9414.692655] BTRFS: selftest: sectorsize: 4096  nodesize: 4096
  [ 9414.692658] BTRFS: selftest: running btrfs free space cache tests
  [ 9414.692918] BTRFS: selftest: running extent only tests
  [ 9414.693061] BTRFS: selftest: running bitmap only tests
  [ 9414.693366] BTRFS: selftest: running bitmap and extent tests
  [ 9414.696455] BTRFS: selftest: running space stealing from bitmap to extent tests
  [ 9414.697131] BTRFS: selftest: running extent buffer operation tests
  [ 9414.697133] BTRFS: selftest: running btrfs_split_item tests
  [ 9414.697564] BTRFS: selftest: running extent I/O tests
  [ 9414.697583] BTRFS: selftest: running find delalloc tests
  [ 9415.081125] BTRFS: selftest: running find_first_clear_extent_bit test
  [ 9415.081278] BTRFS: selftest: running extent buffer bitmap tests
  [ 9415.124192] BTRFS: selftest: running inode tests
  [ 9415.124195] BTRFS: selftest: running btrfs_get_extent tests
  [ 9415.127909] BTRFS: selftest: running hole first btrfs_get_extent test
  [ 9415.128343] BTRFS critical (device (efault)): regular/prealloc extent found for non-regular inode 256
  [ 9415.131428] BTRFS: selftest: fs/btrfs/tests/inode-tests.c:904 expected a real extent, got 0

This happens because the test inodes are created without ever initializing
the i_mode field of the inode, and neither VFS's new_inode() nor the btrfs
callback btrfs_alloc_inode() initialize the i_mode. Initialization of the
i_mode is done through the various callbacks used by the VFS to create
new inodes (regular files, directories, symlinks, tmpfiles, etc), which
all call btrfs_new_inode() which in turn calls inode_init_owner(), which
sets the inode's i_mode. Since the tests only uses new_inode() to create
the test inodes, the i_mode was never initialized.

This always happens on a VM I used with kasan, slub_debug and many other
debug facilities enabled. It also happened to someone who reported this
on bugzilla (on a 5.3-rc).

Fix this by setting i_mode to S_IFREG at btrfs_new_test_inode().

Fixes: 6bf9e4bd ("btrfs: inode: Verify inode mode to avoid NULL pointer dereference")
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204397Signed-off-by: default avatarFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      9f7fec0b
  7. 09 Sep, 2019 32 commits
GitLab Nexedi Edition | About GitLab | About Nexedi | 沪ICP备2021021310号-2 | 沪ICP备2021021310号-7