- 08 Mar, 2012 8 commits
-
-
Johannes Berg authored
There's not much point in passing priv and hw pointers since they can be derived from each other, and the function doesn't use the hw pointer anyway. Remove it. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Johannes Berg authored
The dump functions never access the incoming attributes, so don't pass them. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Johannes Berg authored
The function never uses the priv argument as it only fills in the passed data, so remove the argument. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Johannes Berg authored
There's only one user, so the function can be moved into the correct file. It also loses an argument along the way. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Johannes Berg authored
The function never uses its conf argument, so remove it. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Johannes Berg authored
The function has two arguments it never uses, remove them. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Luciano Coelho authored
-
Arik Nemtsov authored
Track freed FW blocks during Tx. If no blocks were freed during a predefined timeout, initiate a HW recovery. This helps in situations when the FW watchdog fails. Don't trigger recovery during activities that can temporarily stop Tx. This includes: - scanning - buffering packets for sleeping stations (AP role) - ROC on any role Signed-off-by: Arik Nemtsov <arik@wizery.com> Signed-off-by: Eliad Peller <eliad@wizery.com> Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <coelho@ti.com>
-
- 07 Mar, 2012 32 commits
-
-
Attila Fazekas authored
Add AD-HOC support to the rtl8187 based on the rtl8180 source Signed-off-by: Attila Fazekas <turul64@gmail.com> Acked-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Rafał Miłecki authored
Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Thomas Pedersen authored
smatch was complaining: CHECK net/mac80211/mesh_pathtbl.c net/mac80211/mesh_pathtbl.c:562 mesh_path_add() error: double lock 'bottom_half:' net/mac80211/mesh_pathtbl.c:580 mesh_path_add() error: double unlock 'bottom_half:' net/mac80211/mesh_pathtbl.c:589 mesh_path_add() error: double unlock 'bottom_half:' net/mac80211/mesh_pathtbl.c:691 mpp_path_add() error: double lock 'bottom_half:' net/mac80211/mesh_pathtbl.c:707 mpp_path_add() error: double unlock 'bottom_half:' net/mac80211/mesh_pathtbl.c:716 mpp_path_add() error: double unlock 'bottom_half:' net/mac80211/mesh_pathtbl.c:814 mesh_path_flush_by_nexthop() error: double lock 'bottom_half:' net/mac80211/mesh_pathtbl.c:819 mesh_path_flush_by_nexthop() error: double unlock 'bottom_half:' net/mac80211/mesh_pathtbl.c:887 mesh_path_del() error: double lock 'bottom_half:' net/mac80211/mesh_pathtbl.c:901 mesh_path_del() error: double unlock 'bottom_half:' So don't lock / unlock with _bh() while bottom halves are already disabled. Reported-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Signed-off-by: Thomas Pedersen <thomas@cozybit.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Johannes Berg authored
This function is only used in iwl-scan.c, so if we move it up a little in the file it can be made static. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Johannes Berg authored
Do some cleanups here: * remove an unused prototype * remove some unused constants * clean up includes Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Johannes Berg authored
It's only needed in a few places. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Johannes Berg authored
No need to have a special config variable for the PA type, we can just use the additional NIC config function to config the hardware correctly. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Johannes Berg authored
Finally nothing needs to access priv from shared any more, so remove it. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Johannes Berg authored
The nic_config sets uCode dependent register bits, so it must be virtual in the op_mode. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Johannes Berg authored
The base packet structure will (hopefully) be the same for all transports, but what is in it differs. Remove the union of all the possible contents and move the packet itself into the transport header file. This requires changing all users of the union to just use pkt->data. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Johannes Berg authored
Even if the variable might also be used by other transports, there's no need for anything outside of the transport itself to access it, so move it into the private area. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Johannes Berg authored
All variables related to uCode loading (the waitqueue and done indication) should be in the PCI-E transport's private data as this is transport specific. Move them there. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Johannes Berg authored
The transport doesn't really need to know as we can enforce it in the command wrapper. Move the ucode_owner variable into priv and do all enforcing there. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Johannes Berg authored
This will be sharable, but needs to live in the op_mode as it is dependent on command processing. Make a library out of the notification wait code. Since I wrote all of the code originally and only Intel employees changed it, we can also relicense it to dual BSD/GPL. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Johannes Berg authored
In "iwlwifi: consolidate the start_device flow" Emmanuel added the return if the fw isn't there but forgot to take into account that the struct for notification wait needs to be added only after the check -- fix that. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Johannes Berg authored
The HW configuration settings base_params, ht_params and bt_params all should be const, make it so. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Johannes Berg authored
The hardware config ht_params shouldn't be modified, so copy the use_rts_for_aggregation parameter into hw_params and use/modify it there. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Johannes Berg authored
This is the version that can be modified, the config params should be read-only. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Johannes Berg authored
The base_params shouldn't be writable, so keep a copy of this in priv that can be modified. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Johannes Berg authored
This can be used directly from the config now. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Johannes Berg authored
This is a hardware parameter, so it shouldn't be configurable by the user. Users can disable aggregation (which is the only thing affected) with 11n_disable. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Johannes Berg authored
The transport doesn't need to include iwl-core.h any more. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Johannes Berg authored
When the command queue is full, the transport will return -ENOSPC, but the reaction to that depends on the op_mode. Virtualize that, the DVM op_mode checks for CT-kill and restarts the hardware otherwise. We may be able to get rid of this callback by putting the behaviour check into the wrapper but that needs more careful evaluation. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Johannes Berg authored
Tracing used the priv pointer as an identifier, which has the problem that we don't have it in all code, and also some people say no pointers should be "leaked" to userspace. Use the device name instead, it is more useful anyway. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Johannes Berg authored
They are only used in the DVM op_mode. Also move the rfkill debug macros that depend on them. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Johannes Berg authored
There's no need to copy shadow_reg_enable into hw_params since it is a pure hardware parameter that will never change, we can access it from the config directly. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Johannes Berg authored
As iwl_prepare_card_hw() is idempotent (and many cards support AMT anyway) there's no point in calling iwl_prepare_card_hw() only for AMT capable devices -- call it always and simplify the code that way. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Johannes Berg authored
That name better reflects the contents of the file and the fact that it isn't related to iwl-ucode.c. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Johannes Berg authored
The transport layer should only check the hardware RF kill status, not impose any policy or reaction based on it, so move that out of it into the op_mode. For now keep the restriction on loading firmware, that will have to be removed later. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Johannes Berg authored
Now the mutex no longer needs to be shared, so move it into iwl_priv. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Johannes Berg authored
The fact that the mutex must be held is an implementation detail of DVM, but something has to ensure that no two synchronous cmds are submitted concurrently. Move the lockdep assertion into the DVM-specific code, but also make the transport abort if there are two concurrently commands. The assertion is much more useful though as the transport check can only catch it when it actually happens, while the assertion makes sure it can't possibly happen. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
Johannes Berg authored
Currently, we cannot send any commands when the uCode is in RF or CT kill, but that will not be true for all new uCode versions, so we need to move the check into the uCode specific code. Also remove the duplicate rfkill check. Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-