Add a test case where the first property evaluated by Base._edit() is not

modified, and the second one is, causing the first one to be "lost".


git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@20050 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

product/ERP5/tests/testERP5Base.py

@@ -737,6 +737,25 @@ class TestERP5Base(ERP5TypeTestCase):
     self.assertEquals(organisation.getDefaultAddressCity(),'Lille')
     self.assertEquals(organisation.getDefaultAddressZipCode(), '59000')
 
+    # retry last action, inverting the modified property
+    # XXX Whether this test is usefull or not completely depends on Python
+    # implementation. Python currently does not guarantee the order of a dict,
+    # so it might very well be that at some point, a change in the
+    # implementation makes the test always succeed, where it would fail with
+    # the curent implementation.
+    person.manage_delObjects(['default_address'])
+
+    person.edit(
+        default_address_city='Lille',
+        default_address_zip_code='69000')
+
+    self.assertNotEquals(person.getDefaultAddress(),
+        organisation.getDefaultAddress())
+    self.assertEquals(person.getDefaultAddressCity(),'Lille')
+    self.assertEquals(person.getDefaultAddressZipCode(), '69000')
+    self.assertEquals(organisation.getDefaultAddressCity(),'Lille')
+    self.assertEquals(organisation.getDefaultAddressZipCode(), '59000')
+
   ##################################
   ##  Tests
   ##################################