- 09 Nov, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Stan Hu authored
-
- 08 Nov, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Douwe Maan authored
Fix for HackerOne XSS vulnerability in markdown This is an updated blacklist patch to fix https://dev.gitlab.org/gitlab/gitlabhq/merge_requests/2007. No text is removed. Dangerous schemes/protocols and invalid URIs are left intact but not linked. Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/23153 See merge request !2015 Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
-
- 03 Nov, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Rémy Coutable authored
[ci skip] Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
-
- 02 Nov, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Robert Speicher authored
-
- 01 Nov, 2016 4 commits
-
-
Robert Speicher authored
-
Robert Speicher authored
This reverts commit 49bf8674.
-
James Lopez authored
-
James Lopez authored
-
- 11 Oct, 2016 4 commits
-
-
Rémy Coutable authored
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
-
Rémy Coutable authored
API: Share projects only with groups current_user can access Aims to address the issues here: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/23004 * Projects can be shared with non-existent groups * Projects can be shared with groups that the current user does not have access to read Concerns: The new implementation of the API endpoint allows projects to be shared with a larger range of groups than can be done via the web UI. The form for sharing a project with a group uses the following API endpoint to index the available groups: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/494269fc92f61098ee6bd635a0426129ce2c5456/lib/api/groups.rb#L17. The groups indexed in the web form will only be those groups that the user is currently a member of. The new implementation allows projects to be shared with any group that the authenticated user has access to view. This widens the range of groups to those that are public and internal. See merge request !2005 Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Don't send Private-Token headers to Sentry Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/22537 This bumps 'raven' (the Ruby gem we use to send errors to Sentry) to version 2.0.2. We need 2.0.0 or newer to be able to sanitize HTTP headers. See merge request !2004 Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
-
- 29 Sep, 2016 4 commits
-
-
Rémy Coutable authored
-
Ruben Davila authored
-
Ruben Davila authored
-
Ruben Davila authored
-
- 28 Sep, 2016 4 commits
-
-
Robert Speicher authored
Escape HTML nodes in builds commands in ci linter This MR removes call to `simple_format` that behaves like `String#html_safe`, thus it passes unescaped HTML tags to the view. Closes #22541 See merge request !2001 Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
-
Douwe Maan authored
API: disable rails session auth for non-GET/HEAD requests Closes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/22435 See merge request !1999 Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
-
Douwe Maan authored
Set a restrictive CORS policy for the API Closes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/22450 See merge request !1998 Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Enforce the fork_project permission in Projects::CreateService Projects::ForkService delegates to this service almost entirely, but needed one small change so it would propagate create errors correctly. CreateService#execute needs significant refactoring; it is now right at the complexity limit set by Rubocop. I avoided doing so in this commit to keep the diff as small as possible. Closes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/18028 See merge request !1996 Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
-
- 19 Sep, 2016 4 commits
-
-
Rémy Coutable authored
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Avoid conflict with Admin labels when importing GitHub labels If the GitHub project have duplicated labels from the Admin labels, the importer will use the Admin label. Fixes #21319 See merge request !6158 Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
-
Jacob Schatz authored
Restore gl_dropdown.js changes Restores `fieldName` to allow only string values. `fieldName` was changed to accept function as a value in https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/merge_requests/581 Since the approach changed in https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/merge_requests/687 there's no need to accept function as value. Backport changes from https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/merge_requests/687 EE Issue: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/919 See merge request !6234 Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Allow the Rails cookie to be used for API authentication Makes the Rails cookie into a valid authentication token for the Grape API, and uses it instead of token authentication in frontend code that uses the API. Rendering the private token into client-side javascript is a security risk; it may be stolen through XSS or other attacks. In general, re-using API code in the frontend is more desirable than implementing endless actions that return JSON. Closes #18302 See merge request !1995 Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
-
- 14 Sep, 2016 12 commits
-
-
Rémy Coutable authored
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>
-
Douwe Maan authored
Exclude some pending or inactivated rows in Member scopes An unapproved request or not-yet-accepted invite should not give access rights. Neither should a blocked user be considered a member of anything. One visible outcome of this behaviour is that owners and masters of a group or project may be blocked, yet still receive notification emails for access requests. Closes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/21650 See merge request !1994
-
Ruben Davila authored
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Fix merge conflict size limit ## What does this MR do? The merge conflict size limit was set to 100 KB, but the docs (and the test repo, which the feature specs use) say 200 KB! ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? Don't think so. ## Why was this MR needed? Derp. ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - Tests - [x] Added for this feature/bug - [ ] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) See merge request !6052
-
Douwe Maan authored
Fix GitLab import button cc @MrChrisW Closes gitlab-org/gitlab-ce#21795 See merge request !6167
-
Yorick Peterse authored
Fix DB schema to match latest migration See merge request !6256
-
Douwe Maan authored
Merge branch '21109-discussion-resolve-runs-a-single-update-query-per-note-but-should-run-a-single-update-query-for-all-notes-instead' into 'master' Optimize discussion notes resolving and unresolving ## What does this MR do? Optimize discussion notes resolving and unresolving ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? Some changes had to be made to the discussion spec to account for the fact that notes are not individually updated now. I only focused on adapting them for the purpose of the regression fix, but admittedly they could be further improved in readability. ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [ ] API support added - Tests - [x] Added for this feature/bug - [x] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #21109 See merge request !6141
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Fix intermittent spec failures with spec/features/issues/user_uses_slash_commands_spec.rb This MR solves the intermittent spec failure: ``` 1) Issues > User uses slash commands behaves like issuable record that supports slash commands in its description and notes note on issue with a note changing the issue's title when current user cannot change title of issue does not reopen the issue Failure/Error: Gitlab::Routing.url_helpers.namespace_project_url(self.namespace, self) ActionController::UrlGenerationError: No route matches {:action=>"show", :controller=>"projects", :id=>#<Project id: 1, name: "project135", path: "gitlabhq", description: nil, created_at: "2016-08-31 20:45:48", updated_at: "2016-08-31 20:45:48", creator_id: 2, issues_enabled: true, merge_requests_enabled: true, wiki_enabled: true, namespace_id: 2, snippets_enabled: true, last_activity_at: "2016-08-31 20:45:48", import_url: nil, visibility_level: 20, archived: false, avatar: nil, import_status: "none", repository_size: 0.0, star_count: 0, import_type: nil, import_source: nil, commit_count: 0, import_error: nil, ci_id: nil, builds_enabled: true, shared_runners_enabled: true, runners_token: "_rNZHgsHzaDWGbyL3L2F", build_coverage_regex: nil, build_allow_git_fetch: true, build_timeout: 3600, pending_delete: false, public_builds: true, pushes_since_gc: 0, last_repository_check_failed: nil, last_repository_check_at: nil, container_registry_enabled: true, only_allow_merge_if_build_succeeds: false, has_external_issue_tracker: false, repository_storage: "default", request_access_enabled: true, has_external_wiki: false, lfs_enabled: nil>, :namespace_id=>nil} missing required keys: [:namespace_id] Shared Example Group: "issuable record that supports slash commands in its description and notes" called from ./spec/features/issues/user_uses_slash_commands_spec.rb:6 # ./app/models/project.rb:611:in `web_url' # ./app/models/project.rb:975:in `hook_attrs' # ./lib/gitlab/data_builder/note.rb:58:in `build_base_data' # ./lib/gitlab/data_builder/note.rb:38:in `build' # ./app/services/notes/post_process_service.rb:19:in `hook_data' # ./app/services/notes/post_process_service.rb:23:in `execute_note_hooks' # ./app/services/notes/post_process_service.rb:14:in `execute' # ./app/workers/new_note_worker.rb:10:in `perform' # ./app/services/notes/create_service.rb:29:in `execute' # ./app/controllers/projects/notes_controller.rb:26:in `create' # ./lib/gitlab/request_profiler/middleware.rb:15:in `call' # ./lib/gitlab/middleware/go.rb:16:in `call' # ./lib/gitlab/middleware/static.rb:9:in `call' ``` There were a number of issues: 1. Sidekiq async tasks were being run after project namespaces were deleted. Use Sidekiq in fake mode to prevent this from Sidekiq tasks from being enqueued in the first place. 2. Some outstanding Ajax requests (e.g. autocomplete) were still being loaded while `DatabaseCleaner` ran 3. `logout` did not always wait for logout actually to complete Closes #21723 See merge request !6271
-
Jacob Schatz authored
Fix unnecessary horizontal scroll area in pipeline visualizations ## What does this MR do? Removes a min-width attribute for the build pipeline visualization wrapper ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? I am curious why this line was there in the first place. Perhaps I'm just not seeing it. ## Why was this MR needed? I was noticing an unnecessary horizontal scroll bar when viewing pipeline visualizations embedded in merge request builds tab: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/5627/builds ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Line appears to have been introduced in !5742 ## Screenshots (if relevant) ![Screen_Shot_2016-08-24_at_11.15.13_PM](/uploads/e395ed8d4415187735d06b8386fe4633/Screen_Shot_2016-08-24_at_11.15.13_PM.png) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? As this is a very simple cosmetic change, I don't think it warrants inclusion in the changelog, documentation, or tests. - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) See merge request !6005
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Fix an error where we were unable to create a CommitStatus for running state Due to severe refactoring of Pipeline we introduced regression in how CommitStatus is handled. We received an report that it's impossible to create a CommitStatus with state `running` when there were not previous status. The support for Commit Statuses should be simplified. Right now I'm doing minimal change to move forward and fix a bug, but I'll create a new MR that will move all logic that is now part of `lib/api/commit_statuses.rb` to separate service to simplify the implementation. This error happens due to the fact that we introduced additional status of builds: `created`. Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/21345 See merge request !6107
-
Robert Speicher authored
Restore SSH Key title auto-population behavior Closes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/21823 See merge request !6186
-
- 08 Sep, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Ruben Davila authored
-
- 07 Sep, 2016 2 commits
-
-
Ruben Davila authored
-
Fatih Acet authored
Added search for all lists on issue boards Adds a search box to allow the user to search all lists in issue boards rather than just the backlog. ![Screen_Shot_2016-08-30_at_10.33.15](/uploads/67e96055d60a9b3209ce3831a1980c09/Screen_Shot_2016-08-30_at_10.33.15.png) ![Screen_Shot_2016-08-30_at_10.33.19](/uploads/8d5253b8f2ecf1cf9a69d70be8ccf1f9/Screen_Shot_2016-08-30_at_10.33.19.png) Closes #21139 See merge request !6101 Conflicts: app/assets/stylesheets/pages/boards.scss app/views/projects/boards/components/_board.html.haml
-
- 06 Sep, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Annabel Dunstone Gray authored
Merge branch '18851-commit-text-in-activity-commits-page-etc-has-the-wrong-line-height' into 'master' Changed `.commit-row-title` `line-height` to `1.35` from `1` ## What does this MR do? Changes `.commit-row-title` `line-height` to `1.35` from `1`, this is to match the `line-height: 20px;` from before 41c2ea9b. ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? ## Why was this MR needed? Not enough space between commit lines ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #18851. ## Screenshots (if relevant) New screenshot below. ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [ ] API support added - Tests - [ ] Added for this feature/bug - [ ] All builds are passing - [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) Closes #18851 See merge request !5996
-