fix bug of supporting new simulation hierarchy.

git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@32535 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

bt5/erp5_mrp/SkinTemplateItem/portal_skins/erp5_mrp/SimulationMovement_testTransformationModelRule.xml

@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ order = root_applied_rule.getCausalityValue()\n
 \n
 # Test movement\n
 if (root_rule is None or\n
-    root_rule.getPortalType() != "Production Order Model Rule" or\n
+    root_rule.getPortalType() not in ("Production Order Model Rule", "Production Order Model Simulation Rule")  or\n
     order is None or\n
     movement.getSource() is None):\n
   return False\n

bt5/erp5_mrp/SkinTemplateItem/portal_skins/erp5_mrp/SimulationMovement_testTransformationSourcingModelRule.xml

@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ parent_rule = movement.getParentValue().getSpecialiseValue()\n
 \n
 # Test movement\n
 if (root_rule is None or\n
-    root_rule.getPortalType() != "Production Order Model Rule" or\n
+    root_rule.getPortalType() not in ("Production Order Model Rule", "Production Order Model Simulation Rule") or\n
     order is None or\n
     parent_rule.getPortalType() != "Transformation Model Rule"):\n
   return False\n

bt5/erp5_mrp/SkinTemplateItem/portal_skins/erp5_mrp/SimulationMovement_testTransformationSourcingRule.xml

@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ order = root_applied_rule.getCausalityValue()\n
 \n
 # Test movement\n
 if (root_rule is None or\n
-    root_rule.getPortalType() != "Production Order Rule" or\n
+    root_rule.getPortalType() not in ("Production Order Rule", "Production Order Simulation Rule") or\n
     order is None or\n
     movement.getResourceValue() is None or\n
     movement.getSourceValue() is None):\n