-
Kirill Smelkov authored
Benchmark the time it takes for virtmem to handle pagefault with noop loadblk for loadblk both implemented in C and in Python. On my computer it is: name µs/op PagefaultC 269 ± 0% pagefault_py 291 ± 0% Quite a big time in other words. It turned out to be mostly spent in fallocate'ing pages on tmpfs from /dev/shm. Part of the above 269 µs/op is taken by freeing (reclaiming) pages back when benchmarking work size exceed /dev/shm size, and part to allocating. If I limit the work size (via npage in benchmem.c) to be less than whole /dev/shm it starts to be ~ 170 µs/op and with additional tracing it shows as something like this: .. on_pagefault_start 0.954 µs .. vma_on_pagefault_pre 0.954 µs .. ramh_alloc_page_pre 0.954 µs .. ramh_alloc_page 169.992 µs .. vma_on_pagefault 172.853 µs .. vma_on_pagefault_pre 172.853 µs .. vma_on_pagefault 174.046 µs .. on_pagefault_end 174.046 ...
3cfc2728