- 31 Mar, 2020 2 commits
-
-
Jérome Perrin authored
This scripts are used only in code mirror integration
-
Jérome Perrin authored
This busines template has actions using forms from erp5_simulation, for example Rule_view on Payment Simulation Rule
-
- 30 Mar, 2020 7 commits
-
-
Jérome Perrin authored
This portal type is defined in erp5_trade, and the allowed content type in Delivery Builder is defined in erp5_trade, only the allowed content type we defined in erp5_base, which is incorrect, because it makes erp5_trade allow some non existing types in Order Builder. Fix this by moving the allowed content type in erp5_trade.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
- fix indentation - make overloaded methods accept same arguments as on parent class - use list comprehension instead of map()
-
Jérome Perrin authored
PDM has some scripts, such as Consumption_asCellRange, it seems consumption is a generic concept that should be in pdm, not in apparel.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
erp5_pdm does not depend on erp5_trade, so it cannot use proxy fields from erp5_trade
-
Jérome Perrin authored
This business template uses proxy fields from erp5_trade
-
Jérome Perrin authored
These scripts are used in coding style tests, but because it was in erp5_administration, all coding style tests had to install erp5_administration and all its dependencies. Which is against one idea of the coding style test, which is supposed to check that business templates declare their dependencies correctly, but if we install all business templates that erp5_administration depends on, the test might have false positives of missing dependencies.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
This is already defined in erp5_simulation, also Solver Type does not exist in erp5_base
-
- 27 Mar, 2020 7 commits
-
-
Arnaud Fontaine authored
-
Arnaud Fontaine authored
testUpgradeInstanceWithOldDataFs: New Unit Test to check upgrade of old instance to current ERP5 version. After copying old instance ZODB and SQL from erp5-bin.git, this checks whether instance can be successfully through upgrader. Introduced because of 140be41d.
-
Roque authored
See merge request !1085
-
Roque authored
-
Arnaud Fontaine authored
runUnitTest: Set `skip-ownership-checking true` as we already do for a normal instance through zope.conf. Related to 58c9f7c3c688854958592590dd396929b5a0c8d4 in slapos.git.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
In nexedi/erp5@935b39f9 we accidentally enabled coding style test for `erp5_project`. Let's fix the current problems reported by coding style test. See merge request !1087
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
- 26 Mar, 2020 14 commits
-
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
See merge request !1079
-
Lu Xu authored
-
Romain Courteaud authored
It was required by Handlebars
-
Romain Courteaud authored
-
Romain Courteaud authored
Allow to use it from erp5_xhtml_style.
-
Roque authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
This business template is not used and contain a preference referencing non existing paths, which causes errors in coding style test with test_moduleListMethod that cannot display accounting module, because preference is set to group/my_group which does not exist. Instead of trying to fix, let's remove the business template if it's not used.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
Project_viewAccountingTransactionList uses some scripts from erp5_accounting
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
metadata was not committed, so next time VCS tab is used on this business template the path is marked as removed.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
authentication policy, invoicing, ingestion and credential See merge request !1081
-
Jérome Perrin authored
When these printouts were made, cloudooo did not had so many fonts as today, and it was picking up "Liberation Sans" for the "Arial" used in these templates; Since slapos@135cbe43 ( yes, 5 years ago ) we have more fonts, and since then the rendering of these printout changed, a "Roman" font was selected instead. This changes the templates to use explicitly "Liberation Sans", which makes the printouts use the old looks even on newer cloudooo . See merge request !1080
-
- 25 Mar, 2020 3 commits
-
-
Ivan Tyagov authored
In case of erp5_core business template update this code is called (with update=True argument) and thus it will effectively override previous portal_alarms' state which is wrong as no "general purpose" code should overwrite potential developer configuration. Tests passing at https://nexedi.erp5.net/test_result_module/20200324-3BC4D696 thus merging right away. See merge request !1086
-
Roque authored
See merge request !1050
-
Nicolas Wavrant authored
-
- 24 Mar, 2020 7 commits
-
-
Roque authored
-
Roque authored
-
Roque authored
-
Roque authored
-
Ivan Tyagov authored
business template update this code is called (with update=True argument) and thus it will effectivly override previous portal_alarms' state which is wrong as no "general purpose" code should ovewrite potential developer configuration.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
Also extend coding style test to cover this kind of issues with business templates. See merge request !1083
-
Jérome Perrin authored
This caused upgrader errors such as: Error: Web Site web_site_module/ooffice_spreadsheet references a non existant appcache gadget_officejs_spreadsheet.appcache
-