- 24 Feb, 2022 9 commits
-
-
Jérome Perrin authored
Because we want to check consistency on all documents created by configurator, we also need documents created during the test to be consistent (or deleted)
-
Jérome Perrin authored
We had trade phase duplication: - `trade_phase/default/*` were provided by erp5_simulation_test - `trade_phase/trade/*` are provided by erp5_configurator_standard_categories so the former was only for testing and the later were actually used in instance configured by configurator. But in some paths from configurator_standard_*template, which are also used on configurated instances, were using trade_phase/default (the one from test). Some rules were referencing these categories, but apparenlty not using them. To fix this confusion, use trade_phase/trade/* everywhere, and install erp5_configurator_standard_categories where needed in tests.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
BusinessConfiguration have a resource category, but it's the workflow, it's not really a resource, so some APIs from the base Amount class are not available. Because they have no meaning on BusinessConfiguration anyway, define the broken APIs to return nothing. This fixes errors trying to use check_consistency alarm on Business Configurations.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
Tools also contain documents, so it makes sense to check them as well
-
Jérome Perrin authored
These documents were probably edited before they had correct property sheets, because they had local properties as incorrect type, as reported by PropertyTypeValidity: <ERP5Type.ConsistencyMessage for PropertyTypeValidity type_check on portal_gadgets/erp5_persons (message: Attribute gadget_type should be of type lines but is of type <type 'str'>)> <ERP5Type.ConsistencyMessage for PropertyTypeValidity type_check on portal_gadgets/erp5_gadget_new_sale_opportunity (message: Attribute gadget_type should be of type lines but is of type <type 'str'>)> <ERP5Type.ConsistencyMessage for PropertyTypeValidity type_check on portal_gadgets/erp5_gadget_contact_person (message: Attribute gadget_type should be of type lines but is of type <type 'str'>)>
-
Jérome Perrin authored
This disable price lookup on domains, because it errors and because the meaning is not clear. It errors because Domains are MetaResources, so they are subclass of Resource and they inherit the price lookup mechanism, which does not work on domains because of their different `getRelativeUrl` implementation.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
check_consistency alarm checks that every document created satisfy contraints. This is done in order to verify that configurator it self create consistent documents and also that all default documents from a realistic configuration are consistent.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
the API is not to return a list of strings, but a list of ConsistencyMessage
-
- 23 Feb, 2022 2 commits
-
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
Replace it with a method on ERP5Type.Base so these activities get found by CopySupport.unindexObject and flushed, rather than remaining on the interaction workflow's context and failing when run. It seems a lot more likely for a document to be deleted while interactions are being spawned than an interaction workflow itself. So this should be a net benefit in activity stability.
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
This currently only works because CookieCrumbler reacts on *all* urls which contain the magic login & password fields. But the POST request body lacks any value from submit fields, which bypasses the "logged-in" scripts, which is harmless with current code but lack realism.
-
- 22 Feb, 2022 1 commit
-
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
See merge request nexedi/erp5!1516
-
- 21 Feb, 2022 13 commits
-
-
Gabriel Monnerat authored
The initial idea was that publishing documents is something really exceptional, the "attach document" normal use case is typically use cases like attaching a PDF invoice to an invoice document in accounting, ie. most of the time it's with sensitive information that we don't want users to be mistakenly publish on the internet just because they selected a wrong value in the field. Now we have a project with use cases where the attached documents needs to be published, we did not change our mind that publishing an attached document is an exceptional case, but we want to make it possible to configure so that in certain contexts, publishing documents is possible. So we reuse the existing configuration by type based method idea and when the getPreferredAttachedDocumentPublicationState returns "published" we make it possible to publish by default.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
Theses methods have always been using user_id, but where written at a time where there was not such disctinction
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
This test case tries to provide message helpful for debugging in case of assertion failure for assertUserCanPassWorkflowTransition, but this was not correctly using new workflow API and in case of failure there was an error like this: File ".../custom/test.py" self.assertUserCanPassWorkflowTransition(user, 'stop_action', packing_list) File "product/ERP5Type/tests/SecurityTestCase.py", line 237, in failUnlessUserCanPassWorkflowTransition if wf_transition.trigger_type == TRIGGER_USER_ACTION: AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'trigger_type' The previous implementation was using getGuardSummary, which no longer exist in new workflow, so we implement similar logic here. The new message changes a bit, it now look like this: AssertionError: User X can NOT pass stop_action transition on Internal Packing List at /erp5/internal_packing_list_module/20220218-22A38 (draft on delivery_causality_workflow, draft on internal_packing_list_notification_workflow, started on packing_list_workflow). Roles: [Owner, Member, Authenticated, Associate] Available transitions: deliver_action[packing_list_workflow] Expression: Permissions: Groups: * stop_action[packing_list_workflow] Expression: python: not(state_change['object'].getPortalType() == "Sale Packing List" and state_change['object'].getSimulationState() == "confirmed") Permissions: Groups:
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
1b1dbf60 (tests: also consider python unittest failures in functional tests, 2021-06-16) was not counting properly the cases where we have selenium failures. In that case we only want to count selenium failures, if we add with the python failures from status_dict, we report one extra failures. The correct approach is to count selenium failures if any and otherwise count python failures Co-authored-by: Vincent Pelletier <vincent@nexedi.com>
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
Avoids duplicating items from that list.
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
Both so that changes to the list of core business templates are applied on upgrade, and to avoid uninstalling core business templates, if no other maintained-up-to-date business templates depend on them. Also, improve the documentation of the erp5_upgrader version of this script.
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
But make it non-publishable.
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
The main reason is to use portal type setters, and not set the properties directly: setting the properties directly bypasses interactions which trigger type refresh, which hence prevents such changes from being applied to the types until something else would cause a reload. While at it: - modify the property sheet list once only instead of once per added property sheet - only modify the property sheet list when fixit is true - improve constraint message to actually tell what is being detected - do not report a constraint error when no change is necessary - follow naming conventions: avoid abbreviations, variables holding documents must end in "_value" - avoid single-use local variables
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
This reverts commit 77b3f202. For some obscure reason, this affects unit tests related to inventory unit conversion. There seems to be too much code to cleanup to keep this patch for now, so drop it.
-
- 18 Feb, 2022 2 commits
-
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
Document/WebSite&erp5_web: introduce web site language priority convention to fix report language issue on renderjs ui 1. [Browser is supposed to send something between 0 and 1]( https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Accept-Language ) 2. [Localizer will set 2 or 3 for cases where user selected language]( https://lab.nexedi.com/nexedi/erp5/blob/08be2f8cc936fbdc3d5bafb4355c3a475198abc1/product/Localizer/Localizer.py#L149-172 ) 3. all print scripts seems set selected language priority to 10 so here we introduce a convention that site language priority should be 8(>3 and < 10) to fix report language issue
-
- 17 Feb, 2022 7 commits
-
-
Romain Courteaud authored
Fallback to modification_date if a document does not have an effective_date.
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
Indexation activities may spawn further activities, and for_each_activity expects the number of activities after a test to be zero.
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
System user should be more reliable than whatever user has ownership of catalog tool (which may have its account closed or its roles changed).
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
CMFActivity: Fix ActivityRuntimeEnvironment.getPriority when activity was not loaded from an SQL queue. This happens when activities are being flushed from the ActivityBuffer directly, without being inserted into and then loaded from the SQL queue. It is unclear whether there are uses of this pattern besides testCMFActivity, but it is easy enough to fix.
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
Checking activity presence/absence is not enough: it risks both false negatives and false positives. Instead, manually poison the catalog's content and check which value we retrieve after executing spawned activities (if any).
-
- 16 Feb, 2022 6 commits
-
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
it's not finished, rework if need
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
-
Georgios Dagkakis authored
- Remove trailing whitespaces - Follow guidelines - Fixup types
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
Also, use it in Products.ERP5Type.tests.ERP5TypeTestCase.
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
The only use 'my_' has above 'your_' is to provide a default field value without needing a TALES expression. This only gets applied based on the field ID in the form being rendered. Field libraries are never meant to be rendered, so using 'my_' is always (if harmless) pointless. What really matters for the field naming convention (which exist to avoid collisions with form properties) is that *some* prefix is used, be it 'my_' or 'your_'. So update this check rule to tolerate 'your_' prefixes in addition to 'my_'. Also, use 'not any([...])' instead of 'not 1 in [...]'.
-