Commit 0d0cdb02 authored by Aaron Lu's avatar Aaron Lu Committed by Jeff Garzik

libata: restore acpi disable functionality

Commit 66fa7f21 "libata-acpi: improve ACPI disabling" introdcued the
behaviour of disabling ATA ACPI if ata_acpi_on_devcfg failed the 2nd
time, but commit 30dcf76a dropped this behaviour and this caused
problem for Dimitris Damigos, where his laptop can not resume correctly.

The bugzilla page for it is:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49331

The problem is, ata_dev_push_id will fail the 2nd time it is invoked,
and due to disabling ACPI code is dropped, ata_acpi_on_devcfg which
calls ata_dev_push_id will keep failing and eventually made the device
disabled.

This patch restores the original behaviour, if acpi failed the 2nd time,
disable acpi functionality for the device(and we do not event need to
add a debug message for this as it is still there ;-).
Reported-by: default avatarDimitris Damigos <damigos@freemail.gr>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
parent a52f514c
......@@ -76,6 +76,9 @@ acpi_handle ata_dev_acpi_handle(struct ata_device *dev)
acpi_integer adr;
struct ata_port *ap = dev->link->ap;
if (dev->flags & ATA_DFLAG_ACPI_DISABLED)
return NULL;
if (ap->flags & ATA_FLAG_ACPI_SATA) {
if (!sata_pmp_attached(ap))
adr = SATA_ADR(ap->port_no, NO_PORT_MULT);
......@@ -945,6 +948,7 @@ int ata_acpi_on_devcfg(struct ata_device *dev)
return rc;
}
dev->flags |= ATA_DFLAG_ACPI_DISABLED;
ata_dev_warn(dev, "ACPI: failed the second time, disabled\n");
/* We can safely continue if no _GTF command has been executed
......
......@@ -163,6 +163,7 @@ enum {
ATA_DFLAG_DA = (1 << 26), /* device supports Device Attention */
ATA_DFLAG_DEVSLP = (1 << 27), /* device supports Device Sleep */
ATA_DFLAG_ACPI_DISABLED = (1 << 28), /* ACPI for the device is disabled */
ATA_DEV_UNKNOWN = 0, /* unknown device */
ATA_DEV_ATA = 1, /* ATA device */
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment