Skip to content

L
linux
Switch branch/tag
  1. 14 Dec, 2022 1 commit
  3. 12 Dec, 2022 1 commit
    • Rafael J. Wysocki's avatar
      Merge branch 'thermal-intel' · 75b15aa0
      Rafael J. Wysocki authored 
      Merge one more Intel thermal control change for 6.2-rc1:

 - Remove a pointless die_id chec from the Intel HFI thermal control
   driver (Ricardo Neri).

* thermal-intel:
  thermal: intel: hfi: Remove a pointless die_id check
      75b15aa0
  5. 02 Dec, 2022 2 commits
    • Ricardo Neri's avatar
      thermal: intel: hfi: Remove a pointless die_id check · 3a3073b6
      Ricardo Neri authored 
      die_id is an u16 quantity. On single-die systems the default value of
die_id is 0. No need to check for negative values.

Plus, removing this check makes Coverity happy.
Signed-off-by: default avatarRicardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      3a3073b6
    • Rafael J. Wysocki's avatar
      Merge Intel thermal control drivers changes for v6.2 · 7d4b19ab
      Rafael J. Wysocki authored 
       - Add Raptor Lake-S support to the intel_tcc_cooling driver (Zhang
   Rui).

 - Make the intel_tcc_cooling driver detect TCC locking (Zhang Rui).

 - Address Coverity warning in intel_hfi_process_event() (Ricardo Neri).

 - Prevent accidental clearing of HFI in the package thermal interrupt
   status (Srinivas Pandruvada).

 - Protect the clearing of status bits in MSR_IA32_PACKAGE_THERM_STATUS
   and MSR_IA32_THERM_STATUS (Srinivas Pandruvada).

 - Allow the HFI interrupt handler to ACK an event for the same
   timestamp (Srinivas Pandruvada).

* thermal-intel:
  thermal: intel: hfi: ACK HFI for the same timestamp
  thermal: intel: Protect clearing of thermal status bits
  thermal: intel: Prevent accidental clearing of HFI status
  thermal: intel: intel_tcc_cooling: Add TCC cooling support for RaptorLake-S
  thermal: intel: intel_tcc_cooling: Detect TCC lock bit
  thermal: intel: hfi: Improve the type of hfi_features::nr_table_pages
      7d4b19ab
  7. 25 Nov, 2022 1 commit
  9. 23 Nov, 2022 3 commits
    • Srinivas Pandruvada's avatar
      thermal: intel: hfi: ACK HFI for the same timestamp · c0e3acdc
      Srinivas Pandruvada authored 
      Some processors issue more than one HFI interrupt with the same
timestamp. Each interrupt must be acknowledged to let the hardware issue
new HFI interrupts. But this can't be done without some additional flow
modification in the existing interrupt handling.

For background, the HFI interrupt is a package level thermal interrupt
delivered via a LVT. This LVT is common for both the CPU and package
level interrupts. Hence, all CPUs receive the HFI interrupts. But only
one CPU should process interrupt and others simply exit by issuing EOI
to LAPIC.

The current HFI interrupt processing flow:

  1. Receive Thermal interrupt
  2. Check if there is an active HFI status in MSR_IA32_THERM_STATUS
  3. Try and get spinlock, one CPU will enter spinlock and others
     will simply return from here to issue EOI.
    (Let's assume CPU 4 is processing interrupt)
  4. Check the stored time-stamp from the HFI memory time-stamp
  5. if same
  6.      ignore interrupt, unlock and return
  7. Copy the HFI message to local buffer
  8. unlock spinlock
  9. ACK HFI interrupt
 10. Queue the message for processing in a work-queue

It is tempting to simply acknowledge all the interrupts even if they
have the same timestamp. This may cause some interrupts to not be
processed.

Let's say CPU5 is slightly late and reaches step 4 while CPU4 is
between steps 8 and 9.

Currently we simply ignore interrupts with the same timestamp. No
issue here for CPU5. When CPU4 acknowledges the interrupt, the next
HFI interrupt can be delivered.

If we acknowledge interrupts with the same timestamp (at step 6), there
is a race condition. Under the same scenario, CPU 5 will acknowledge
the HFI interrupt. This lets hardware generate another HFI interrupt,
before CPU 4 start executing step 9. Once CPU 4 complete step 9, it
will acknowledge the newly arrived HFI interrupt, without actually
processing it.

Acknowledge the interrupt when holding the spinlock. This avoids
contention of the interrupt acknowledgment.

Updated flow:

  1. Receive HFI Thermal interrupt
  2. Check if there is an active HFI status in MSR_IA32_THERM_STATUS
  3. Try and get spin-lock
     Let's assume CPU 4 is processing interrupt
  4.1 Read MSR_IA32_PACKAGE_THERM_STATUS and check HFI status bit
  4.2	If hfi status is 0
  4.3		unlock spinlock
  4.4		return
  4.5 Check the stored time-stamp from the HFI memory time-stamp
  5. if same
  6.1      ACK HFI Interrupt,
  6.2	unlock spinlock
  6.3	return
  7. Copy the HFI message to local buffer
  8. ACK HFI interrupt
  9. unlock spinlock
 10. Queue the message for processing in a work-queue

To avoid taking the lock unnecessarily, intel_hfi_process_event() checks
the status of the HFI interrupt before taking the lock. If CPU5 is late,
when it starts processing the interrupt there are two scenarios:

 a) CPU4 acknowledged the HFI interrupt before CPU5 read
    MSR_IA32_THERM_STATUS. CPU5 exits.

 b) CPU5 reads MSR_IA32_THERM_STATUS before CPU4 has acknowledged the
    interrupt. CPU5 will take the lock if CPU4 has released it. It then
    re-reads MSR_IA32_THERM_STATUS. If there is not a new interrupt,
    the HFI status bit is clear and CPU5 exits. If a new HFI interrupt
    was generated it will find that the status bit is set and it will
    continue to process the interrupt. In this case even if timestamp
    is not changed, the ACK can be issued as this is a new interrupt.
Signed-off-by: default avatarSrinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarRicardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Arshad, Adeel<adeel.arshad@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      c0e3acdc
    • Srinivas Pandruvada's avatar
      thermal: intel: Protect clearing of thermal status bits · 930d06bf
      Srinivas Pandruvada authored 
      The clearing of the package thermal status is done by Read-Modify-Write
operation. This may result in clearing of some new status bits which are
being or about to be processed.

For example, while clearing of HFI status, after read of thermal status
register, a new thermal status bit is set by the hardware. But during
write back, the newly generated status bit will be set to 0 or cleared.
So, it is not safe to do read-modify-write.

Since thermal status Read-Write bits can be set to only 0 not 1, it is
safe to set all other bits to 1 which are not getting cleared.

Create a common interface for clearing package thermal status bits. Use
this interface to replace existing code to clear thermal package status
bits.

It is safe to call from different CPUs without protection as there is no
read-modify-write. Also wrmsrl results in just single instruction. For
example while CPU 0 and CPU 3 are clearing bit 1 and 3 respectively. If
CPU 3 wins the race, it will write 0x4000aa2, then CPU 1 will write
0x4000aa8. The bits which are not part of clear are set to 1. The default
mask for bits, which can be written here is 0x4000aaa.
Signed-off-by: default avatarSrinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarRicardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      930d06bf
    • Srinivas Pandruvada's avatar
      thermal: intel: Prevent accidental clearing of HFI status · 6fe1e64b
      Srinivas Pandruvada authored 
      When there is a package thermal interrupt with PROCHOT log, it will be
processed and cleared. It is possible that there is an active HFI event
status, which is about to get processed or getting processed. While
clearing PROCHOT log bit, it will also clear HFI status bit. This means
that hardware is free to update HFI memory.

When clearing a package thermal interrupt, some processors will generate
a "general protection fault" when any of the read only bit is set to 1.

The driver maintains a mask of all read-write bits which can be set.

This mask doesn't include HFI status bit. This bit will also be cleared,
as it will be assumed read-only bit. So, add HFI status bit 26 to the
mask.
Signed-off-by: default avatarSrinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarRicardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      6fe1e64b
  11. 14 Nov, 2022 9 commits
    • Guenter Roeck's avatar
      thermal/core: Protect thermal device operations against thermal device removal · b778b4d7
      Guenter Roeck authored 
      Thermal device operations may be called after thermal zone device removal.
After thermal zone device removal, thermal zone device operations must
no longer be called. To prevent such calls from happening, ensure that
the thermal device is registered before executing any thermal device
operations.
Signed-off-by: default avatarGuenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: default avatarRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      b778b4d7
    • Guenter Roeck's avatar
      thermal/core: Remove thermal_zone_set_trips() · 91b3aafc
      Guenter Roeck authored 
      Since no callers of thermal_zone_set_trips() are left, remove the function.
Document __thermal_zone_set_trips() instead. Explicitly state that the
thermal zone lock must be held when calling the function, and that the
pointer to the thermal zone must be valid.
Signed-off-by: default avatarGuenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: default avatarRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      91b3aafc
    • Guenter Roeck's avatar
      thermal/core: Protect sysfs accesses to thermal operations with thermal zone mutex · 05eeee2b
      Guenter Roeck authored 
      Protect access to thermal operations against thermal zone removal by
acquiring the thermal zone device mutex. After acquiring the mutex, check
if the thermal zone device is registered and abort the operation if not.

With this change, we can call __thermal_zone_device_update() instead of
thermal_zone_device_update() from trip_point_temp_store() and from
emul_temp_store(). Similar, we can call __thermal_zone_set_trips() instead
of thermal_zone_set_trips() from trip_point_hyst_store().
Signed-off-by: default avatarGuenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: default avatarRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      05eeee2b
    • Guenter Roeck's avatar
      thermal/core: Protect hwmon accesses to thermal operations with thermal zone mutex · ea37bec5
      Guenter Roeck authored 
      In preparation to protecting access to thermal operations against thermal
zone device removal, protect hwmon accesses to thermal zone operations
with the thermal zone mutex. After acquiring the mutex, ensure that the
thermal zone device is registered before proceeding.
Signed-off-by: default avatarGuenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: default avatarRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      ea37bec5
    • Guenter Roeck's avatar
      thermal/core: Introduce locked version of thermal_zone_device_update · 1c439dec
      Guenter Roeck authored 
      In thermal_zone_device_set_mode(), the thermal zone mutex is released only
to be reacquired in the subsequent call to thermal_zone_device_update().

Introduce __thermal_zone_device_update(), which is similar to
thermal_zone_device_update() but has to be called with the thermal device
mutex held. Call the new function from thermal_zone_device_set_mode()
to avoid the extra thermal device mutex release/acquire sequence in that
function.

With the new function in place, re-implement thermal_zone_device_update()
as wrapper around __thermal_zone_device_update() to acquire and release
the thermal device mutex.
Signed-off-by: default avatarGuenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: default avatarRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      1c439dec
    • Guenter Roeck's avatar
      thermal/core: Move parameter validation from __thermal_zone_get_temp to thermal_zone_get_temp · ed97d10a
      Guenter Roeck authored 
      All callers of __thermal_zone_get_temp() already validated the
thermal zone parameters. Move validation to thermal_zone_get_temp()
where it is actually needed. Also add kernel documentation for
__thermal_zone_get_temp(), listing the requirement that the
function must be called with validated parameters and with thermal
device mutex held.
Signed-off-by: default avatarGuenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: default avatarRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      ed97d10a
    • Guenter Roeck's avatar
      thermal/core: Ensure that thermal device is registered in thermal_zone_get_temp · 1c6b3006
      Guenter Roeck authored 
      Calls to thermal_zone_get_temp() are not protected against thermal zone
device removal. As result, it is possible that the thermal zone operations
callbacks are no longer valid when thermal_zone_get_temp() is called.
This may result in crashes such as

BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffffffc04ef420
 #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
 #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
PGD 5d60e067 P4D 5d60e067 PUD 5d610067 PMD 110197067 PTE 0
Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
CPU: 1 PID: 3209 Comm: cat Tainted: G        W         5.10.136-19389-g615abc6eb807 #1 02df41ac0b12f3a64f4b34245188d8875bb3bce1
Hardware name: Google Coral/Coral, BIOS Google_Coral.10068.92.0 11/27/2018
RIP: 0010:thermal_zone_get_temp+0x26/0x73
Code: 89 c3 eb d3 0f 1f 44 00 00 55 48 89 e5 41 57 41 56 53 48 85 ff 74 50 48 89 fb 48 81 ff 00 f0 ff ff 77 44 48 8b 83 98 03 00 00 <48> 83 78 10 00 74 36 49 89 f6 4c 8d bb d8 03 00 00 4c 89 ff e8 9f
RSP: 0018:ffffb3758138fd38 EFLAGS: 00010287
RAX: ffffffffc04ef410 RBX: ffff98f14d7fb000 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: ffff98f17cf90000 RSI: ffffb3758138fd64 RDI: ffff98f14d7fb000
RBP: ffffb3758138fd50 R08: 0000000000001000 R09: ffff98f17cf90000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: ffffffff8dacad28 R12: 0000000000001000
R13: ffff98f1793a7d80 R14: ffff98f143231708 R15: ffff98f14d7fb018
FS:  00007ec166097800(0000) GS:ffff98f1bbd00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: ffffffffc04ef420 CR3: 000000010ee9a000 CR4: 00000000003506e0
Call Trace:
 temp_show+0x31/0x68
 dev_attr_show+0x1d/0x4f
 sysfs_kf_seq_show+0x92/0x107
 seq_read_iter+0xf5/0x3f2
 vfs_read+0x205/0x379
 __x64_sys_read+0x7c/0xe2
 do_syscall_64+0x43/0x55
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x61/0xc6

if a thermal device is removed while accesses to its device attributes
are ongoing.

The problem is exposed by code in iwl_op_mode_mvm_start(), which registers
a thermal zone device only to unregister it shortly afterwards if an
unrelated failure is encountered while accessing the hardware.

Check if the thermal zone device is registered after acquiring the
thermal zone device mutex to ensure this does not happen.

The code was tested by triggering the failure in iwl_op_mode_mvm_start()
on purpose. Without this patch, the kernel crashes reliably. The crash
is no longer observed after applying this and the preceding patches.
Signed-off-by: default avatarGuenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: default avatarRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      1c6b3006
    • Guenter Roeck's avatar
      thermal/core: Delete device under thermal device zone lock · 30b2ae07
      Guenter Roeck authored 
      Thermal device attributes may still be opened after unregistering
the thermal zone and deleting the thermal device.

Currently there is no protection against accessing thermal device
operations after unregistering a thermal zone. To enable adding
such protection, protect the device delete operation with the
thermal zone device mutex. This requires splitting the call to
device_unregister() into its components, device_del() and put_device().
Only the first call can be executed under mutex protection, since
put_device() may result in releasing the thermal zone device memory.
Signed-off-by: default avatarGuenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: default avatarRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      30b2ae07
    • Guenter Roeck's avatar
      thermal/core: Destroy thermal zone device mutex in release function · d35f29ed
      Guenter Roeck authored 
      Accesses to thermal zones, and with it the thermal zone device mutex,
are still possible after the thermal zone device has been unregistered.
For example, thermal_zone_get_temp() can be called from temp_show()
in thermal_sysfs.c if the sysfs attribute was opened before the thermal
device was unregistered.

Move the call to mutex_destroy from thermal_zone_device_unregister()
to thermal_release() to ensure that it is only destroyed after it is
guaranteed to be no longer accessed.
Signed-off-by: default avatarGuenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: default avatarRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      d35f29ed
  13. 09 Nov, 2022 2 commits
  15. 28 Oct, 2022 2 commits
  17. 25 Oct, 2022 2 commits
  19. 23 Oct, 2022 9 commits
  21. 22 Oct, 2022 8 commits
GitLab Nexedi Edition | About GitLab | About Nexedi | 沪ICP备2021021310号-2 | 沪ICP备2021021310号-7