Skip to content

L
linux
Switch branch/tag
  1. 22 Jan, 2019 34 commits
  3. 16 Jan, 2019 6 commits
    • Greg Kroah-Hartman's avatar
      Linux 4.19.16 · 9c5931b6
      Greg Kroah-Hartman authored
      9c5931b6
    • Filipe Manana's avatar
      Btrfs: use nofs context when initializing security xattrs to avoid deadlock · 7a1b9b76
      Filipe Manana authored 
      commit 827aa18e upstream.

When initializing the security xattrs, we are holding a transaction handle
therefore we need to use a GFP_NOFS context in order to avoid a deadlock
with reclaim in case it's triggered.

Fixes: 39a27ec1 ("btrfs: use GFP_KERNEL for xattr and acl allocations")
Reviewed-by: default avatarNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      7a1b9b76
    • Filipe Manana's avatar
      Btrfs: fix deadlock when enabling quotas due to concurrent snapshot creation · 79aa5c0d
      Filipe Manana authored 
      commit 9a6f209e upstream.

If the quota enable and snapshot creation ioctls are called concurrently
we can get into a deadlock where the task enabling quotas will deadlock
on the fs_info->qgroup_ioctl_lock mutex because it attempts to lock it
twice, or the task creating a snapshot tries to commit the transaction
while the task enabling quota waits for the former task to commit the
transaction while holding the mutex. The following time diagrams show how
both cases happen.

First scenario:

           CPU 0                                    CPU 1

 btrfs_ioctl()
  btrfs_ioctl_quota_ctl()
   btrfs_quota_enable()
    mutex_lock(fs_info->qgroup_ioctl_lock)
    btrfs_start_transaction()

                                             btrfs_ioctl()
                                              btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2
                                               create_snapshot()
                                                --> adds snapshot to the
                                                    list pending_snapshots
                                                    of the current
                                                    transaction

    btrfs_commit_transaction()
     create_pending_snapshots()
       create_pending_snapshot()
        qgroup_account_snapshot()
         btrfs_qgroup_inherit()
	   mutex_lock(fs_info->qgroup_ioctl_lock)
	    --> deadlock, mutex already locked
	        by this task at
		btrfs_quota_enable()

Second scenario:

           CPU 0                                    CPU 1

 btrfs_ioctl()
  btrfs_ioctl_quota_ctl()
   btrfs_quota_enable()
    mutex_lock(fs_info->qgroup_ioctl_lock)
    btrfs_start_transaction()

                                             btrfs_ioctl()
                                              btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2
                                               create_snapshot()
                                                --> adds snapshot to the
                                                    list pending_snapshots
                                                    of the current
                                                    transaction

                                                btrfs_commit_transaction()
                                                 --> waits for task at
                                                     CPU 0 to release
                                                     its transaction
                                                     handle

    btrfs_commit_transaction()
     --> sees another task started
         the transaction commit first
     --> releases its transaction
         handle
     --> waits for the transaction
         commit to be completed by
         the task at CPU 1

                                                 create_pending_snapshot()
                                                  qgroup_account_snapshot()
                                                   btrfs_qgroup_inherit()
                                                    mutex_lock(fs_info->qgroup_ioctl_lock)
                                                     --> deadlock, task at CPU 0
                                                         has the mutex locked but
                                                         it is waiting for us to
                                                         finish the transaction
                                                         commit

So fix this by setting the quota enabled flag in fs_info after committing
the transaction at btrfs_quota_enable(). This ends up serializing quota
enable and snapshot creation as if the snapshot creation happened just
before the quota enable request. The quota rescan task, scheduled after
committing the transaction in btrfs_quote_enable(), will do the accounting.

Fixes: 6426c7ad ("btrfs: qgroup: Fix qgroup accounting when creating snapshot")
Signed-off-by: default avatarFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      79aa5c0d
    • Filipe Manana's avatar
      Btrfs: fix access to available allocation bits when starting balance · 829431a2
      Filipe Manana authored 
      commit 5a8067c0 upstream.

The available allocation bits members from struct btrfs_fs_info are
protected by a sequence lock, and when starting balance we access them
incorrectly in two different ways:

1) In the read sequence lock loop at btrfs_balance() we use the values we
   read from fs_info->avail_*_alloc_bits and we can immediately do actions
   that have side effects and can not be undone (printing a message and
   jumping to a label). This is wrong because a retry might be needed, so
   our actions must not have side effects and must be repeatable as long
   as read_seqretry() returns a non-zero value. In other words, we were
   essentially ignoring the sequence lock;

2) Right below the read sequence lock loop, we were reading the values
   from avail_metadata_alloc_bits and avail_data_alloc_bits without any
   protection from concurrent writers, that is, reading them outside of
   the read sequence lock critical section.

So fix this by making sure we only read the available allocation bits
while in a read sequence lock critical section and that what we do in the
critical section is repeatable (has nothing that can not be undone) so
that any eventual retry that is needed is handled properly.

Fixes: de98ced9 ("Btrfs: use seqlock to protect fs_info->avail_{data, metadata, system}_alloc_bits")
Fixes: 14506127 ("btrfs: fix a bogus warning when converting only data or metadata")
Reviewed-by: default avatarNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      829431a2
    • Will Deacon's avatar
      arm64: compat: Don't pull syscall number from regs in arm_compat_syscall · 6c9a2046
      Will Deacon authored 
      commit 53290432 upstream.

The syscall number may have been changed by a tracer, so we should pass
the actual number in from the caller instead of pulling it from the
saved r7 value directly.

Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Pi-Hsun Shih <pihsun@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      6c9a2046
    • Christoffer Dall's avatar
      KVM: arm/arm64: Fix VMID alloc race by reverting to lock-less · 4f14f446
      Christoffer Dall authored 
      commit fb544d1c upstream.

We recently addressed a VMID generation race by introducing a read/write
lock around accesses and updates to the vmid generation values.

However, kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run() also calls need_new_vmid_gen() but
does so without taking the read lock.

As far as I can tell, this can lead to the same kind of race:

  VM 0, VCPU 0			VM 0, VCPU 1
  ------------			------------
  update_vttbr (vmid 254)
  				update_vttbr (vmid 1) // roll over
				read_lock(kvm_vmid_lock);
				force_vm_exit()
  local_irq_disable
  need_new_vmid_gen == false //because vmid gen matches

  enter_guest (vmid 254)
  				kvm_arch.vttbr = <PGD>:<VMID 1>
				read_unlock(kvm_vmid_lock);

  				enter_guest (vmid 1)

Which results in running two VCPUs in the same VM with different VMIDs
and (even worse) other VCPUs from other VMs could now allocate clashing
VMID 254 from the new generation as long as VCPU 0 is not exiting.

Attempt to solve this by making sure vttbr is updated before another CPU
can observe the updated VMID generation.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: f0cf47d9 "KVM: arm/arm64: Close VMID generation race"
Reviewed-by: default avatarJulien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarChristoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      4f14f446
GitLab Nexedi Edition | About GitLab | About Nexedi | 沪ICP备2021021310号-2 | 沪ICP备2021021310号-7