- 08 Aug, 2019 6 commits
-
-
Kuninori Morimoto authored
card->deferred_resume_work is used if CONFIG_PM_SLEEP was defined. but 1) It is defined even though CONFIG_PM_SLEEP was not defined 2) random ifdef code is difficult to read. This patch tidyup these issues. Signed-off-by:
Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/877e7paho1.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.comSigned-off-by:
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
-
Kuninori Morimoto authored
list_for_each_entry_safe() will do nothing if it was empty list. This patch removes unneeded list_empty() check for list_for_each_entry_safe(). Signed-off-by:
-
Kuninori Morimoto authored
We have 2 soc_init_card_debugfs() implementations for with/without DEBUG_FS. But, snd_soc_instantiate_card() calls snd_soc_dapm_debugfs_init() under ifdef DEBUG_FS after soc_init_card_debugfs(). This is very strange. We can call snd_soc_dapm_debugfs_init() under soc_init_card_debugfs(). #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS => static void soc_init_card_debugfs(...) { ... } ... #else => static inline void soc_init_card_debugfs(...) { ... } #endif static int snd_soc_instantiate_card(struct snd_soc_card *card) { ... => soc_init_card_debugfs(card); * #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS * snd_soc_dapm_debugfs_init(&card->dapm, card->debugfs_card_root); * #endif } Signed-off-by: -
Kuninori Morimoto authored
snd_soc_add_card_controls() registers controls by using for(... i < num; ...). If controls was NULL, num should be zero. Thus, we don't need to check about controls pointer. This patch also cares missing return value. Signed-off-by:
-
Kuninori Morimoto authored
snd_soc_dapm_add_routes() registers routes by using for(... i < num; ...). If routes was NULL, num should be zero. Thus, we don't need to check about route pointer. This patch also cares missing return value. Signed-off-by:
-
Kuninori Morimoto authored
snd_soc_add_component_controls() registers controls by using for(... i < num; ...). If controls was NULL, num should be zero. Thus, we don't need to check about controls pointer. This patch also cares missing return value. Signed-off-by:
-
- 07 Aug, 2019 15 commits
-
-
Daniel Baluta authored
SAI module on imx7ulp/imx8m features 2 new registers (VERID and PARAM) at the beginning of register address space. On imx7ulp FIFOs can held up to 16 x 32 bit samples. On imx8mq FIFOs can held up to 128 x 32 bit samples. Signed-off-by:
Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@nxp.com> Acked-by:
Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190806151214.6783-5-daniel.baluta@nxp.comSigned-off-by:
-
Daniel Baluta authored
New IP version introduces Version ID and Parameter registers and optionally added Timestamp feature. VERID and PARAM registers are placed at the top of registers address space and some registers are shifted according to the following table: Tx/Rx data registers and Tx/Rx FIFO registers keep their addresses, all other registers are shifted by 8. SAI Memory map is described in chapter 13.10.4.1.1 I2S Memory map of the Reference Manual [1]. In order to make as less changes as possible we attach an offset to each register offset to each changed register definition. The offset is read from each board private data. [1]https://cache.nxp.com/secured/assets/documents/en/reference-manual/IMX8MDQLQRM.pdf?__gda__=1563728701_38bea7f0f726472cc675cb141b91bec7&fileExt=.pdfSigned-off-by:
Mihai Serban <mihai.serban@nxp.com> [initial coding in the NXP internal tree] Signed-off-by:
Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@nxp.com> [bugfixing and cleanups] Signed-off-by:
-
Daniel Baluta authored
Tx channel enable (TCE) / Rx channel enable (RCE) bits enable corresponding data channel for Tx/Rx operation. Because SAI supports up the 8 channels TCE/RCE occupy up the 8 bits inside TCR3/RCR3 registers we need to extend the mask to reflect this. Signed-off-by:
-
Daniel Baluta authored
SAI IP supports up to 8 data lines. The configuration of supported number of data lines is decided at SoC integration time. This patch adds definitions for all related data TX/RX registers: * TDR0..7, Transmit data register * TFR0..7, Transmit FIFO register * RDR0..7, Receive data register * RFR0..7, Receive FIFO register Signed-off-by:
-
Cezary Rojewski authored
struct ipc_message contains fields: header, tx_data and tx_size which represent TX i.e. request while RX is represented by rx_data and rx_size with reply's header equivalent missing. Reply header may contain some vital information including, but not limited to, received payload size. Some IPCs have entire payload found within RX header instead. Content and value of said header is context dependent and may vary between firmware versions and target platform. Current model does not allow such IPCs to function at all. Rather than appending yet another parameter to an already long list of such for sst_ipc_tx_message_XXXs, declare message container in form of struct sst_ipc_message and add them to parent's ipc_message declaration. Align haswell, baytrail and skylake with updated request-reply model and modify their reply processing functions to save RX header within message container. Despite the range of changes, status quo is achieved. Signed-off-by:
Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190723144341.21339-2-cezary.rojewski@intel.comSigned-off-by:
-
Kuninori Morimoto authored
snd_soc_dapm_new_controls() registers controls by using for(... i < num; ...). It means if widget was NULL, num should be zero. Thus, we don't need to check about widget pointer. This patch also cares missing return value. Signed-off-by:
Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Kuninori Morimoto authored
snd_soc_rtdcom_add() is using both "rtdcom" and "new_rtdcom" as variable name, but these are not used at same time. Let's reuse rtdcom. Signed-off-by:
-
Kuninori Morimoto authored
It doesn't removes list during loop at snd_soc_find_dai_link(). We don't need to use _safe loop. Signed-off-by:
-
Kuninori Morimoto authored
snd_soc_add_dai_link() might return error, we need to check it. Signed-off-by:
-
Kuninori Morimoto authored
soc-core has many for_each_xxx, but it is a little bit difficult to know which list is relead to which for_each_xxx. This patch adds missing comment for it. Signed-off-by:
-
Kuninori Morimoto authored
To be more safety code, let's set NULL to component->debugfs_root when it was cleanuped. Signed-off-by:
-
Daniel Baluta authored
For i.MX7ULP and i.MX8MQ register map is changed. Add two new compatbile strings to differentiate this. Signed-off-by:
-
Pierre-Louis Bossart authored
The addition of a kernel module parameter to optionally disable MSI had the side effect of permanently disabling it. The return value of pci_alloc_irq_vectors() is the number of allocated vectors or a negative number on error, so testing with the ! operator is not quite right. It was one optimization too far. Restore previous behavior to use MSI by default, unless the user selects not to do so or the allocation of irq_vectors fails. Fixes: 672ff5e3 ('ASoC: SOF: Intel: hda: add a parameter to disable MSI') Signed-off-by:
Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190806170603.10815-1-pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by:
-
Shuming Fan authored
The factory test needs to know whether the calibration completed. This flag helps to confirm the calibration completed or not. Signed-off-by:
Shuming Fan <shumingf@realtek.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190806091459.14382-1-shumingf@realtek.comSigned-off-by:
-
Shuming Fan authored
- The user level application could set the R0 temperature after booting system. The degree Celsius of R0 temperature store in the non-volatile space when doing R0 calibration. - TDM1 ADC2DAT Swap controls use to control TDM slot2/3 data Signed-off-by:
-
- 05 Aug, 2019 19 commits
-
-
Kuninori Morimoto authored
Current ALSA SoC is directly using component->driver->xxx, thus, the code nested deeply, and it makes code difficult to read, and is not good for encapsulation. We want to implement component related function at soc-component.c, but, some of them need to care whole snd_soc_pcm_runtime (= rtd) connected component. Let's call component related function which need to care with for_each_rtdcom() loop as snd_soc_pcm_component_xxx(). This patch adds new snd_soc_pcm_component_pcm_free() and use it. Signed-off-by:
-
Kuninori Morimoto authored
Current ALSA SoC is directly using component->driver->xxx, thus, the code nested deeply, and it makes code difficult to read, and is not good for encapsulation. We want to implement component related function at soc-component.c, but, some of them need to care whole snd_soc_pcm_runtime (= rtd) connected component. Let's call component related function which need to care with for_each_rtdcom() loop as snd_soc_pcm_component_xxx(). This patch adds new snd_soc_pcm_component_pcm() and use it. Signed-off-by:
-
Kuninori Morimoto authored
Current ALSA SoC is directly using component->driver->ops->xxx, thus, the code nested deeply, and it makes code difficult to read, and is not good for encapsulation. We want to implement component related function at soc-component.c, but, some of them need to care whole snd_soc_pcm_runtime (= rtd) connected component. Let's call component related function which need to care with for_each_rtdcom() loop as snd_soc_pcm_component_xxx(). This patch adds new snd_soc_pcm_component_mmap() and use it. Signed-off-by:
-
Kuninori Morimoto authored
Current ALSA SoC is directly using component->driver->ops->xxx, thus, the code nested deeply, and it makes code difficult to read, and is not good for encapsulation. We want to implement component related function at soc-component.c, but, some of them need to care whole snd_soc_pcm_runtime (= rtd) connected component. Let's call component related function which need to care with for_each_rtdcom() loop as snd_soc_pcm_component_xxx(). This patch adds new snd_soc_pcm_component_page() and use it. Signed-off-by:
-
Kuninori Morimoto authored
Current ALSA SoC is directly using component->driver->ops->xxx, thus, the code nested deeply, and it makes code difficult to read, and is not good for encapsulation. We want to implement component related function at soc-component.c, but, some of them need to care whole snd_soc_pcm_runtime (= rtd) connected component. Let's call component related function which need to care with for_each_rtdcom() loop as snd_soc_pcm_component_xxx(). This patch adds new snd_soc_pcm_component_copy_user() and use it. Signed-off-by:
-
Kuninori Morimoto authored
Current ALSA SoC is directly using component->driver->ops->xxx, thus, the code nested deeply, and it makes code difficult to read, and is not good for encapsulation. We want to implement component related function at soc-component.c, but, some of them need to care whole snd_soc_pcm_runtime (= rtd) connected component. Let's call component related function which need to care with for_each_rtdcom() loop as snd_soc_pcm_component_xxx(). This patch adds new snd_soc_pcm_component_ioctrl() and use it. Signed-off-by:
-
Kuninori Morimoto authored
Current ALSA SoC is directly using component->driver->ops->xxx, thus, the code nested deeply, and it makes code difficult to read, and is not good for encapsulation. We want to implement component related function at soc-component.c, but, some of them need to care whole snd_soc_pcm_runtime (= rtd) connected component. Let's call component related function which need to care with for_each_rtdcom() loop as snd_soc_pcm_component_xxx(). This patch adds new snd_soc_pcm_component_pointer() and use it. Signed-off-by:
-
Kuninori Morimoto authored
Current soc-dapm / soc-core are using a long way round to call .set_bias_level. if (driver->set_bias_level) dapm->set_bias_level = ...; ... if (dapm->set_bias_level) ret = dapm->set_bias_level(...); We can directly call it via driver->set_bias_level. One note here is that both Card and Component have dapm, but, Card's dapm doesn't have dapm->component. We need to check it. This patch moves snd_soc_component_set_bias_level() to soc-component.c and updates parameters. dapm->set_bias_level is no longer needed Signed-off-by:
-
Kuninori Morimoto authored
Current soc-dapm / soc-core are using a long way round to call .stream_event. if (driver->stream_event) dapm->stream_event = ...; ... if (dapm->stream_event) ret = dapm->stream_event(...); We can directly call it via driver->stream_event. One note here is that both Card and Component have dapm, but, Card's dapm doesn't have dapm->component. We need to check it. This patch moves snd_soc_component_stream_event() to soc-component.c and updates parameters. dapm->stream_event is no longer needed Signed-off-by:
-
Kuninori Morimoto authored
Current soc-dapm / soc-core are using a long way round to call .seq_notifier. if (driver->seq_notifier) dapm->seq_notifier = ...; ... if (dapm->seq_notifier) ret = dapm->seq_notifier(...); We can directly call it via driver->seq_notifier. One note here is that both Card and Component have dapm, but, Card's dapm doesn't have dapm->component. We need to check it. This patch moves snd_soc_component_seq_notifier() to soc-component.c, and updates parameters. dapm->seq_notifier is no longer needed Signed-off-by:
-
Kuninori Morimoto authored
Current ALSA SoC is directly using component->driver->xxx, thus, it is deep nested, and makes code difficult to read, and is not good for encapsulation. This patch adds new snd_soc_component_of_xlate_dai_name() and use it Signed-off-by:
-
Kuninori Morimoto authored
Current ALSA SoC is directly using component->driver->xxx, thus, it is deep nested, and makes code difficult to read, and is not good for encapsulation. This patch adds new snd_soc_component_of_xlate_dai_id() and use it. Signed-off-by:
-
Kuninori Morimoto authored
Current ALSA SoC is directly using component->driver->xxx, thus, it is deep nested, and makes code difficult to read, and is not good for encapsulation. This patch adds new snd_soc_component_remove() and use it. Signed-off-by:
-
Kuninori Morimoto authored
Current ALSA SoC is directly using component->driver->xxx, thus, it is deep nested, and makes code difficult to read, and is not good for encapsulation. This patch adds new snd_soc_component_probe() and use it. Signed-off-by:
-
Kuninori Morimoto authored
Current ALSA SoC is directly using component->xxx, But, it is not good for encapsulation. This patch adds new snd_soc_component_is_suspended() and use it. Signed-off-by:
-
Kuninori Morimoto authored
Current ALSA SoC is directly using component->driver->xxx, thus, it is deep nested, and makes code difficult to read, and is not good for encapsulation. This patch adds new snd_soc_component_resume() and use it. Signed-off-by:
-
Kuninori Morimoto authored
Current ALSA SoC is directly using component->driver->xxx, thus, it is deep nested, and makes code difficult to read, and is not good for encapsulation. This patch adds new snd_soc_component_suspend() and use it. Signed-off-by:
-
Kuninori Morimoto authored
Current ALSA SoC is directly using component->driver->ops->xxx, thus, it is deep nested, and makes code difficult to read, and is not good for encapsulation. This patch adds new snd_soc_component_trigger() and use it. Signed-off-by:
-
Kuninori Morimoto authored
Current ALSA SoC is directly using component->driver->ops->xxx, thus, it is deep nested, and makes code difficult to read, and is not good for encapsulation. This patch adds new snd_soc_component_hw_free() and use it. Signed-off-by:
-
