Undo last changes : although all tests went fine, it breaks many things. Time...

Undo last changes : although all tests went fine, it breaks many things. Time to write some more tests.


git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@10261 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de

product/ERP5/bootstrap/erp5_xhtml_style/SkinTemplateItem/portal_skins/erp5_xhtml_style/ERP5XhtmlStyle_filterParameterList.xml

@@ -68,24 +68,50 @@
         </item>
         <item>
             <key> <string>_body</string> </key>
-            <value> <string>kept_names = (\'editable_mode\', \'ignore_layout\',                                 # erp5_web\n
-              \'selection_name\', \'selection_index\',                              # list mode\n
-              \'form_id\',                                                        # list mode and view mode\n
-              \'dialog_id\', \'dialog_method\', \'update_method\', \'dialog_category\', # dialog mode\n
-              \'object_uid\', \'object_path\',                                      # view mode\n
-              \'field_id\', \'form_pickle\', \'form_signature\',                      # related string field\n
-              \'cancel_url\',                                                     # xhtml_style\n
-             )\n
-kept_names = dict([(key, None) for key in kept_names])\n
+            <value> <string># XXX: This file contains many duplicated loops when filtering, this is done on purpose :\n
+# Each loop contains variable names which concern a certain hidden field generator (listbox, xhtml style,...).\n
+# Above each loop is said wether it is normal or shoul dbe fixed.\n
 \n
 def isValid(value_name):\n
   """\n
     Return true when the given field name can be propagated, false otherwise.\n
+\n
+    FIXME: _select should be a prefix, not a sufix, to avoid potential collisions with property names.\n
   """\n
-  if kept_names.has_key(value_name):\n
+  prefix = value_name.split(\'_\')[0]\n
+  if value_name == \'field_id\' \\\n
+     or prefix not in (\'field\', \'subfield\', \'default\', \'select\', \'search\'):\n
     return True\n
   return False\n
 \n
+# Remove a strange value. No idea on its meaning nor what it does here.\n
+if parameter_list.has_key(\'-C\'):\n
+  del parameter_list[\'-C\']\n
+\n
+# erp5_xhtml_style special fields.\n
+# This is normal.\n
+for k in (\'came_from\', \'SearchableText\', \'workflow_action\', \'portal_status_message\', \'reset\', \'dialog_id\', \'update_method\', \'dialog_method\', \'cancel_method\'):\n
+  if parameter_list.has_key(k):\n
+    del parameter_list[k]\n
+\n
+# Listbox search fields special values\n
+# XXX: This should not be needed.\n
+# for k in (\'id\', \'title\', \'description\', \'reporter\'):\n
+#   if parameter_list.has_key(k):\n
+#     del parameter_list[k]\n
+\n
+# Listbox special fields.\n
+# XXX: This should not be needed.\n
+for k in (\'listbox\', \'list_start\', \'uids\', \'listbox_uid\', \'list_selection_name\', \'md5_object_uid_list\'):\n
+  if parameter_list.has_key(k):\n
+    del parameter_list[k]\n
+\n
+# Subversion special fields\n
+# XXX: This should not be needed.\n
+for k in (\'changelog\', \'added\', \'removed\', \'modified\'):\n
+  if parameter_list.has_key(k):\n
+    del parameter_list[k]\n
+\n
 for k in parameter_list.keys():\n
   if not isValid(k):\n
     del parameter_list[k]\n
@@ -134,17 +160,11 @@ return parameter_list\n
                         <value>
                           <tuple>
                             <string>parameter_list</string>
-                            <string>kept_names</string>
-                            <string>dict</string>
-                            <string>append</string>
-                            <string>$append0</string>
-                            <string>_getiter_</string>
-                            <string>key</string>
-                            <string>None</string>
                             <string>isValid</string>
                             <string>_getattr_</string>
-                            <string>k</string>
                             <string>_write_</string>
+                            <string>_getiter_</string>
+                            <string>k</string>
                           </tuple>
                         </value>
                     </item>