Commit d9df9783 authored by Vincent Pelletier's avatar Vincent Pelletier

Undo last changes : although all tests went fine, it breaks many things. Time...

Undo last changes : although all tests went fine, it breaks many things. Time to write some more tests.


git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@10261 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de
parent 50ccec74
...@@ -68,24 +68,50 @@ ...@@ -68,24 +68,50 @@
</item> </item>
<item> <item>
<key> <string>_body</string> </key> <key> <string>_body</string> </key>
<value> <string>kept_names = (\'editable_mode\', \'ignore_layout\', # erp5_web\n <value> <string># XXX: This file contains many duplicated loops when filtering, this is done on purpose :\n
\'selection_name\', \'selection_index\', # list mode\n # Each loop contains variable names which concern a certain hidden field generator (listbox, xhtml style,...).\n
\'form_id\', # list mode and view mode\n # Above each loop is said wether it is normal or shoul dbe fixed.\n
\'dialog_id\', \'dialog_method\', \'update_method\', \'dialog_category\', # dialog mode\n
\'object_uid\', \'object_path\', # view mode\n
\'field_id\', \'form_pickle\', \'form_signature\', # related string field\n
\'cancel_url\', # xhtml_style\n
)\n
kept_names = dict([(key, None) for key in kept_names])\n
\n \n
def isValid(value_name):\n def isValid(value_name):\n
"""\n """\n
Return true when the given field name can be propagated, false otherwise.\n Return true when the given field name can be propagated, false otherwise.\n
\n
FIXME: _select should be a prefix, not a sufix, to avoid potential collisions with property names.\n
"""\n """\n
if kept_names.has_key(value_name):\n prefix = value_name.split(\'_\')[0]\n
if value_name == \'field_id\' \\\n
or prefix not in (\'field\', \'subfield\', \'default\', \'select\', \'search\'):\n
return True\n return True\n
return False\n return False\n
\n \n
# Remove a strange value. No idea on its meaning nor what it does here.\n
if parameter_list.has_key(\'-C\'):\n
del parameter_list[\'-C\']\n
\n
# erp5_xhtml_style special fields.\n
# This is normal.\n
for k in (\'came_from\', \'SearchableText\', \'workflow_action\', \'portal_status_message\', \'reset\', \'dialog_id\', \'update_method\', \'dialog_method\', \'cancel_method\'):\n
if parameter_list.has_key(k):\n
del parameter_list[k]\n
\n
# Listbox search fields special values\n
# XXX: This should not be needed.\n
# for k in (\'id\', \'title\', \'description\', \'reporter\'):\n
# if parameter_list.has_key(k):\n
# del parameter_list[k]\n
\n
# Listbox special fields.\n
# XXX: This should not be needed.\n
for k in (\'listbox\', \'list_start\', \'uids\', \'listbox_uid\', \'list_selection_name\', \'md5_object_uid_list\'):\n
if parameter_list.has_key(k):\n
del parameter_list[k]\n
\n
# Subversion special fields\n
# XXX: This should not be needed.\n
for k in (\'changelog\', \'added\', \'removed\', \'modified\'):\n
if parameter_list.has_key(k):\n
del parameter_list[k]\n
\n
for k in parameter_list.keys():\n for k in parameter_list.keys():\n
if not isValid(k):\n if not isValid(k):\n
del parameter_list[k]\n del parameter_list[k]\n
...@@ -134,17 +160,11 @@ return parameter_list\n ...@@ -134,17 +160,11 @@ return parameter_list\n
<value> <value>
<tuple> <tuple>
<string>parameter_list</string> <string>parameter_list</string>
<string>kept_names</string>
<string>dict</string>
<string>append</string>
<string>$append0</string>
<string>_getiter_</string>
<string>key</string>
<string>None</string>
<string>isValid</string> <string>isValid</string>
<string>_getattr_</string> <string>_getattr_</string>
<string>k</string>
<string>_write_</string> <string>_write_</string>
<string>_getiter_</string>
<string>k</string>
</tuple> </tuple>
</value> </value>
</item> </item>
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment