This is required for multiple sites support and allow us write unit tests and not create a 100 lines mock.

   This allow the administrator define which Login portal types are searched.

Prefer to use Login_checkExistence from this Skins over the version on erp5_base.

Also extend tests to cover recently changes

This reverts commit 9eb3828d.

   This is an alternetive way to login using Certificates. Probably this format
   will evolve into use caucase;  however this only introduce some most basic features.

   Use Certificate Login for store login definitions

   Move test into the business template

  Please squash me in future.

  This optimisation aims reduce the potential activity leak when over launching accross multiple activities/transactions the updateSimulation.
  SubscriptionItem: Add a method to call updateSimulation from sqldict activities
    updateExpandableRootSimulation allow launch activities in a safer matter and have lower calls.

  If the user wants actitivites, it should create multiples StandardBT5ConfiguratorItems,
  This should accellerate Tests based on ERP5Configurator.

  This should be recoded, but it should speed up bootstrap of a site,
  as get modified objects are not called.

It the user don't have fully permission on the object (already changed state), this set will fail to check if source should be defined.

Ignore list is usefull when you have old business templates in production (used to include data for example) and test business templates on test environment (ie;: erp5_test_ui_core). This allow us control the dump to assert changes easily.

1 minute is too agressive for general use.

  The upgrade ordering seems buggy and requires to force reinstall it

This allow during a subscription process, create a user and them create all
documents using that user w/o rely on proxy roles (keeping good ownership
across the documents).

Without this (on slapos master ui) the redirection places value unquoted causing parser to fail later on when resolve {n.me}

  The user can be present from diferent logins, password tool only works with ERP5LoginUserMager
  users.

Mixed commit:

  43b1ae1b
  2f05fe1b

Returning true allows to add movements to existing one, and this group shall
always separate them.

uid is used internally during recursive calls and using uid can lead to
traverse all lines of catalog.

Note: Generic code shall have no constraints at all.

Conflicts:

	bt5/erp5_accounting/bt/revision

If 2 lines have the same effective date (catalog has a 1 second precision),
always return the validate and open first.

Commit: 02d06501

Changes applied from history:

http://git.erp5.org/gitweb/erp5.git/history/refs/heads/interaction-drop:/product/ERP5/Document/SubscriptionItem.py?js=1

Original commit from : Lukasz Nowak <luke@nexedi.com>
                       3e45ec35

From Lukasz Nowak:

1- Compensation is undesired. (51c8a250)

  Raise loudly with message.

2- Disallow any compensation. (3c74ed07)

3- Emit more informative log. (534b2e77)

Also minimise activity hurricane by calling expand directly.

Open Orders are searched using indexation timestamp, which allows to see them
in "windows", and does not repeat expand if not needed.

Generate activities and allow to pass the tag. Use search and activate
everywhere which will allow to walk through objects without killing the cluster
even in case of really big documents.

Avoid calling isDivergent which can take few minutes to finish.

causality_state comes from well designed causality workflow, which informs
enough about delivery state. Fetching causality_state property is extremely
fast.

Notes:

Do nothing on 'calculate' instead of disabling *_causality_interaction_workflow as
these interaction workflows do not generate activities directly, and do work
that can't be postponed.

By contrast, 'calculate' transition of delivery_causality_workflow is modified
so that no 'updateCausalityState' activity is created by default.

This commit also update list of method_id which should not call calculate_causality

Conflicts:
	bt5/erp5_crm/bt/revision

These are simple report/exports, they work fine with ERP5JS

Since a long time python unittest provides good assertions and we don't need to
build out own.