- 10 Jun, 2014 40 commits
-
-
Filipe Manana authored
On snapshot creation (either writable or read-only), we do orphan cleanup against the root of the snapshot. If the cleanup did remove any orphans, then the current root node will be different from the commit root node until the next transaction commit happens. A send operation always uses the commit root of a snapshot - this means it will see the orphans if it starts computing the send stream before the next transaction commit happens (triggered by a timer or sync() for .e.g), which is when the commit root gets assigned a reference to current root, where the orphans are not visible anymore. The consequence of send seeing the orphans is explained below. For example: mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd mount -o commit=999 /dev/sdd /mnt # open a file with O_TMPFILE and leave it open # write some data to the file btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/send.data The send operation will fail with the following error: ERROR: send ioctl failed with -116: Stale file handle What happens here is that our snapshot has an orphan inode still visible through the commit root, that corresponds to the tmpfile. However send will attempt to call inode.c:btrfs_iget(), with the goal of reading the file's data, which will return -ESTALE because it will use the current root (and not the commit root) of the snapshot. Of course, there are other cases where we can get orphans, but this example using a tmpfile makes it much easier to reproduce the issue. Therefore on snapshot creation, after calling btrfs_orphan_cleanup, if the commit root is different from the current root, just commit the transaction associated with the snapshot's root (if it exists), so that a send will not see any orphans that don't exist anymore. This also guarantees a send will always see the same content regardless of whether a transaction commit happened already before the send was requested and after the orphan cleanup (meaning the commit root and current roots are the same) or it hasn't happened yet (commit and current roots are different). Signed-off-by:Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
Filipe Manana authored
In ioctl.c:lock_extent_range(), after locking our target range, the ordered extent that btrfs_lookup_first_ordered_extent() returns us may not overlap our target range at all. In this case we would just unlock our target range, wait for any new ordered extents that overlap the range to complete, lock again the range and repeat all these steps until we don't get any ordered extent and the delalloc flag isn't set in the io tree for our target range. Therefore just stop if we get an ordered extent that doesn't overlap our target range and the dealalloc flag isn't set for the range in the inode's io tree. Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
When cloning a range of a file, we were visiting all the extent items in the btree that belong to our source inode. We don't need to visit those extent items that don't overlap the range we are cloning, as doing so only makes us waste time and do unnecessary btree navigations (btrfs_next_leaf) for inodes that have a large number of file extent items in the btree. Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
We were setting the BTRFS_ROOT_SUBVOL_DEAD flag on the root of the parent of our target snapshot, instead of setting it in the target snapshot's root. This is easy to observe by running the following scenario: mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd mount /dev/sdd /mnt btrfs subvolume create /mnt/first_subvol btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/mysnap1 btrfs subvolume delete /mnt/first_subvol btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/mysnap2 btrfs send -p /mnt/mysnap1 /mnt/mysnap2 -f /tmp/send.data The send command failed because the send ioctl returned -EPERM. A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by:David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
We were cleaning the clone target file range from the page cache before we did replace the file extent items in the fs tree. This was racy, as right after cleaning the relevant range from the page cache and before replacing the file extent items, a read against that range could be performed by another task and populate again the page cache with stale data (stale after the cloning finishes). This would result in reads after the clone operation successfully finishes to get old data (and potentially for a very long time). Therefore evict the pages after replacing the file extent items, so that subsequent reads will always get the new data. Similarly, we were prone to races while cloning the file extent items because we weren't locking the target range and wait for any existing ordered extents against that range to complete. It was possible that after cloning the extent items, a write operation that was performed before the clone operation and overlaps the same range, would end up undoing all or part of the work the clone operation did (a worker task running inode.c:btrfs_finish_ordered_io). Therefore lock the target range in the io tree, wait for all pending ordered extents against that range to finish and then safely perform the cloning. The issue of reading stale data after the clone operation is easy to reproduce by running the following C program in a loop until it exits with return value 1. #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <pthread.h> #include <fcntl.h> #include <assert.h> #include <asm/types.h> #include <linux/ioctl.h> #include <sys/stat.h> #include <sys/types.h> #include <sys/ioctl.h> #define SRC_FILE "/mnt/sdd/foo" #define DST_FILE "/mnt/sdd/bar" #define FILE_SIZE (16 * 1024) #define PATTERN_SRC 'X' #define PATTERN_DST 'Y' struct btrfs_ioctl_clone_range_args { __s64 src_fd; __u64 src_offset, src_length; __u64 dest_offset; }; #define BTRFS_IOCTL_MAGIC 0x94 #define BTRFS_IOC_CLONE_RANGE _IOW(BTRFS_IOCTL_MAGIC, 13, \ struct btrfs_ioctl_clone_range_args) static pthread_mutex_t mutex = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER; static int clone_done = 0; static int reader_ready = 0; static int stale_data = 0; static void *reader_loop(void *arg) { char buf[4096], want_buf[4096]; memset(want_buf, PATTERN_SRC, 4096); pthread_mutex_lock(&mutex); reader_ready = 1; pthread_mutex_unlock(&mutex); while (1) { int done, fd, ret; fd = open(DST_FILE, O_RDONLY); assert(fd != -1); pthread_mutex_lock(&mutex); done = clone_done; pthread_mutex_unlock(&mutex); ret = read(fd, buf, 4096); assert(ret == 4096); close(fd); if (done) { ret = memcmp(buf, want_buf, 4096); if (ret == 0) { printf("Found new content\n"); } else { printf("Found old content\n"); pthread_mutex_lock(&mutex); stale_data = 1; pthread_mutex_unlock(&mutex); } break; } } return NULL; } int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { pthread_t reader; int ret, i, fd; struct btrfs_ioctl_clone_range_args clone_args; int fd1, fd2; ret = remove(SRC_FILE); if (ret == -1 && errno != ENOENT) { fprintf(stderr, "Error deleting src file: %s\n", strerror(errno)); return 1; } ret = remove(DST_FILE); if (ret == -1 && errno != ENOENT) { fprintf(stderr, "Error deleting dst file: %s\n", strerror(errno)); return 1; } fd = open(SRC_FILE, O_CREAT | O_WRONLY | O_TRUNC, S_IRWXU); assert(fd != -1); for (i = 0; i < FILE_SIZE; i++) { char c = PATTERN_SRC; ret = write(fd, &c, 1); assert(ret == 1); } close(fd); fd = open(DST_FILE, O_CREAT | O_WRONLY | O_TRUNC, S_IRWXU); assert(fd != -1); for (i = 0; i < FILE_SIZE; i++) { char c = PATTERN_DST; ret = write(fd, &c, 1); assert(ret == 1); } close(fd); sync(); ret = pthread_create(&reader, NULL, reader_loop, NULL); assert(ret == 0); while (1) { int r; pthread_mutex_lock(&mutex); r = reader_ready; pthread_mutex_unlock(&mutex); if (r) break; } fd1 = open(SRC_FILE, O_RDONLY); if (fd1 < 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Error open src file: %s\n", strerror(errno)); return 1; } fd2 = open(DST_FILE, O_RDWR); if (fd2 < 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Error open dst file: %s\n", strerror(errno)); return 1; } clone_args.src_fd = fd1; clone_args.src_offset = 0; clone_args.src_length = 4096; clone_args.dest_offset = 0; ret = ioctl(fd2, BTRFS_IOC_CLONE_RANGE, &clone_args); assert(ret == 0); close(fd1); close(fd2); pthread_mutex_lock(&mutex); clone_done = 1; pthread_mutex_unlock(&mutex); ret = pthread_join(reader, NULL); assert(ret == 0); pthread_mutex_lock(&mutex); ret = stale_data ? 1 : 0; pthread_mutex_unlock(&mutex); return ret; } Signed-off-by: -
Rickard Strandqvist authored
There is otherwise a risk of a possible null pointer dereference. Was largely found by using a static code analysis program called cppcheck. Signed-off-by:
Rickard Strandqvist <rickard_strandqvist@spectrumdigital.se> Signed-off-by:
-
Jeff Mahoney authored
We are currently allocating space_info objects in an array when we allocate space_info. When a user does something like: # btrfs balance start -mconvert=raid1 -dconvert=raid1 /mnt # btrfs balance start -mconvert=single -dconvert=single /mnt -f # btrfs balance start -mconvert=raid1 -dconvert=raid1 / We can end up with memory corruption since the kobject hasn't been reinitialized properly and the name pointer was left set. The rationale behind allocating them statically was to avoid creating a separate kobject container that just contained the raid type. It used the index in the array to determine the index. Ultimately, though, this wastes more memory than it saves in all but the most complex scenarios and introduces kobject lifetime questions. This patch allocates the kobjects dynamically instead. Note that we also remove the kobject_get/put of the parent kobject since kobject_add and kobject_del do that internally. Signed-off-by:
Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Reported-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
We were limiting the sum of the xattr name and value lengths to PATH_MAX, which is not correct, specially on filesystems created with btrfs-progs v3.12 or higher, where the default leaf size is max(16384, PAGE_SIZE), or systems with page sizes larger than 4096 bytes. Xattrs have their own specific maximum name and value lengths, which depend on the leaf size, therefore use these limits to be able to send xattrs with sizes larger than PATH_MAX. A test case for xfstests follows. Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
If we are doing an incremental send and the base snapshot has a directory with name X that doesn't exist anymore in the second snapshot and a new subvolume/snapshot exists in the second snapshot that has the same name as the directory (name X), the incremental send would fail with -ENOENT error. This is because it attempts to lookup for an inode with a number matching the objectid of a root, which doesn't exist. Steps to reproduce: mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd mount /dev/sdd /mnt mkdir /mnt/testdir btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/mysnap1 rmdir /mnt/testdir btrfs subvolume create /mnt/testdir btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/mysnap2 btrfs send -p /mnt/mysnap1 /mnt/mysnap2 -f /tmp/send.data A test case for xfstests follows. Reported-by:Robert White <rwhite@pobox.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Mason authored
Delayed extent operations are triggered during transaction commits. The goal is to queue up a healthly batch of changes to the extent allocation tree and run through them in bulk. This farms them off to async helper threads. The goal is to have the bulk of the delayed operations being done in the background, but this is also important to limit our stack footprint. Signed-off-by: -
Chris Mason authored
__extent_writepage has two unrelated parts. First it does the delayed allocation dance and second it does the mapping and IO for the page we're actually writing. This splits it up into those two parts so the stack from one doesn't impact the stack from the other. Signed-off-by: -
Alex Gartrell authored
In these instances, we are trying to determine if a page has been accessed since we began the operation for the sake of retry. This is easily accomplished by doing a gang lookup in the page mapping radix tree, and it saves us the dependency on the flag (so that we might eventually delete it). btrfs_page_exists_in_range borrows heavily from find_get_page, replacing the radix tree look up with a gang lookup of 1, so that we can find the next highest page >= index and see if it falls into our lock range. Signed-off-by:
Alex Gartrell <agartrell@fb.com>
-
Chris Mason authored
This adds noinline_for_stack to two helpers used by btree_write_cache_pages. It shaves us down from 424 bytes on the stack to 280. Signed-off-by: -
Chris Mason authored
__btrfs_write_out_cache was one of our stack pigs. This breaks it up into helper functions and slims it down to 194 bytes. Signed-off-by: -
Josef Bacik authored
Memory leaks are bad mmkay? Signed-off-by:
Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Anand Jain authored
I have an opinion that system logs /var/log/messages are valuable info to investigate the real system issues at the data center. People handling data center issues do spend a lot time and efforts analyzing messages files. Having usage error logged into /var/log/messages is something we should avoid. Signed-off-by:
Anand Jain <Anand.Jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by:
-
David Sterba authored
Signed-off-by:
-
David Sterba authored
I've noticed an extra line after "use no compression", but search revealed much more in messages of more critical levels and rare errors. Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Mason authored
We need to NULL the cached_state after freeing it, otherwise we might free it again if find_delalloc_range doesn't find anything. Signed-off-by: -
ZhangZhen authored
use the newer and more pleasant kstrtoull() to replace simple_strtoull(), because simple_strtoull() is marked for obsoletion. Signed-off-by:
Zhang Zhen <zhenzhang.zhang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Wang Shilong authored
Seeding device support allows us to create a new filesystem based on existed filesystem. However newly created filesystem's @total_devices should include seed devices. This patch fix the following problem: # mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb # btrfstune -S 1 /dev/sdb # mount /dev/sdb /mnt # btrfs device add -f /dev/sdc /mnt --->fs_devices->total_devices = 1 # umount /mnt # mount /dev/sdc /mnt --->fs_devices->total_devices = 2 This is because we record right @total_devices in superblock, but @fs_devices->total_devices is reset to be 0 in btrfs_prepare_sprout(). Fix this problem by not resetting @fs_devices->total_devices. Signed-off-by:
Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Guangliang Zhao authored
Even CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_POSIX_ACL is not defined, the acl still could been enabled using a mount option, and now fs/btrfs/acl.o is not built, so the mount options will appear to be supported but will be silently ignored. Signed-off-by:
Guangliang Zhao <lucienchao@gmail.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
This exercises the various parts of the new qgroup accounting code. We do some basic stuff and do some things with the shared refs to make sure all that code works. I had to add a bunch of infrastructure because I needed to be able to insert items into a fake tree without having to do all the hard work myself, hopefully this will be usefull in the future. Thanks, Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
Currently qgroups account for space by intercepting delayed ref updates to fs trees. It does this by adding sequence numbers to delayed ref updates so that it can figure out how the tree looked before the update so we can adjust the counters properly. The problem with this is that it does not allow delayed refs to be merged, so if you say are defragging an extent with 5k snapshots pointing to it we will thrash the delayed ref lock because we need to go back and manually merge these things together. Instead we want to process quota changes when we know they are going to happen, like when we first allocate an extent, we free a reference for an extent, we add new references etc. This patch accomplishes this by only adding qgroup operations for real ref changes. We only modify the sequence number when we need to lookup roots for bytenrs, this reduces the amount of churn on the sequence number and allows us to merge delayed refs as we add them most of the time. This patch encompasses a bunch of architectural changes 1) qgroup ref operations: instead of tracking qgroup operations through the delayed refs we simply add new ref operations whenever we notice that we need to when we've modified the refs themselves. 2) tree mod seq: we no longer have this separation of major/minor counters. this makes the sequence number stuff much more sane and we can remove some locking that was needed to protect the counter. 3) delayed ref seq: we now read the tree mod seq number and use that as our sequence. This means each new delayed ref doesn't have it's own unique sequence number, rather whenever we go to lookup backrefs we inc the sequence number so we can make sure to keep any new operations from screwing up our world view at that given point. This allows us to merge delayed refs during runtime. With all of these changes the delayed ref stuff is a little saner and the qgroup accounting stuff no longer goes negative in some cases like it was before. Thanks, Signed-off-by:
-
Liu Bo authored
According to commit 865ffef3 (fs: fix fsync() error reporting), it's not stable to just check error pages because pages can be truncated or invalidated, we should also mark mapping with error flag so that a later fsync can catch the error. Signed-off-by:
Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Liu Bo authored
Same as normal devices, seed devices should be initialized with fs_info->dev_root as well, otherwise we'll get a NULL pointer crash. Cc: Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com> Reported-by:
Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Wang Shilong authored
We hit something like the following function call flows: |->run_delalloc_range() |->btrfs_join_transaction() |->cow_file_range() |->btrfs_join_transaction() |->find_free_extent() |->btrfs_join_transaction() Trace infomation can be seen as: [ 7411.127040] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 7411.127060] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 11557 at fs/btrfs/transaction.c:383 start_transaction+0x561/0x580 [btrfs]() [ 7411.127079] CPU: 0 PID: 11557 Comm: kworker/u8:9 Tainted: G O 3.13.0+ #4 [ 7411.127080] Hardware name: LENOVO QiTianM4350/ , BIOS F1KT52AUS 05/24/2013 [ 7411.127085] Workqueue: writeback bdi_writeback_workfn (flush-btrfs-5) [ 7411.127092] Call Trace: [ 7411.127097] [<ffffffff815b87b0>] dump_stack+0x45/0x56 [ 7411.127101] [<ffffffff81051ffd>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7d/0xa0 [ 7411.127102] [<ffffffff810520da>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20 [ 7411.127109] [<ffffffffa0444fb1>] start_transaction+0x561/0x580 [btrfs] [ 7411.127115] [<ffffffffa0445027>] btrfs_join_transaction+0x17/0x20 [btrfs] [ 7411.127120] [<ffffffffa0431c91>] find_free_extent+0xa21/0xb50 [btrfs] [ 7411.127126] [<ffffffffa0431f68>] btrfs_reserve_extent+0xa8/0x1a0 [btrfs] [ 7411.127131] [<ffffffffa04322ce>] btrfs_alloc_free_block+0xee/0x440 [btrfs] [ 7411.127137] [<ffffffffa043bd6e>] ? btree_set_page_dirty+0xe/0x10 [btrfs] [ 7411.127142] [<ffffffffa041da51>] __btrfs_cow_block+0x121/0x530 [btrfs] [ 7411.127146] [<ffffffffa041dfff>] btrfs_cow_block+0x11f/0x1c0 [btrfs] [ 7411.127151] [<ffffffffa0421b74>] btrfs_search_slot+0x1d4/0x9c0 [btrfs] [ 7411.127157] [<ffffffffa0438567>] btrfs_lookup_file_extent+0x37/0x40 [btrfs] [ 7411.127163] [<ffffffffa0456bfc>] __btrfs_drop_extents+0x16c/0xd90 [btrfs] [ 7411.127169] [<ffffffffa0444ae3>] ? start_transaction+0x93/0x580 [btrfs] [ 7411.127171] [<ffffffff811663e2>] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x132/0x140 [ 7411.127176] [<ffffffffa041cd9a>] ? btrfs_alloc_path+0x1a/0x20 [btrfs] [ 7411.127182] [<ffffffffa044aa61>] cow_file_range_inline+0x181/0x2e0 [btrfs] [ 7411.127187] [<ffffffffa044aead>] cow_file_range+0x2ed/0x440 [btrfs] [ 7411.127194] [<ffffffffa0464d7f>] ? free_extent_buffer+0x4f/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 7411.127200] [<ffffffffa044b38f>] run_delalloc_nocow+0x38f/0xa60 [btrfs] [ 7411.127207] [<ffffffffa0461600>] ? test_range_bit+0x30/0x180 [btrfs] [ 7411.127212] [<ffffffffa044bd48>] run_delalloc_range+0x2e8/0x350 [btrfs] [ 7411.127219] [<ffffffffa04618f9>] ? find_lock_delalloc_range+0x1a9/0x1e0 [btrfs] [ 7411.127222] [<ffffffff812a1e71>] ? blk_queue_bio+0x2c1/0x330 [ 7411.127228] [<ffffffffa0462ad4>] __extent_writepage+0x2f4/0x760 [btrfs] Here we fix it by avoiding joining transaction again if we have held a transaction handle when allocating chunk in find_free_extent(). Signed-off-by: -
Miao Xie authored
Signed-off-by:
Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
To ease finding bugs during development related to modifying btree leaves in such a way that it makes its items not sorted by key anymore. Since this is an expensive check, it's only enabled if CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_CHECK_INTEGRITY is set, which isn't meant to be enabled for regular users. Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
When the csum tree is empty, our leaf (path->nodes[0]) has a number of items equal to 0 and since btrfs_header_nritems() returns an unsigned integer (and so is our local nritems variable) the following comparison always evaluates to false: if (path->slots[0] >= nritems - 1) { As the casting rules lead to: if ((u32)0 >= (u32)4294967295) { This makes us access key at slot paths->slots[0] + 1 (1) of the empty leaf some lines below: btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(path->nodes[0], &found_key, slot); if (found_key.objectid != BTRFS_EXTENT_CSUM_OBJECTID || found_key.type != BTRFS_EXTENT_CSUM_KEY) { found_next = 1; goto insert; } So just don't access such non-existent slot and don't set found_next to 1 when the tree is empty. It's very unlikely we'll get a random key with the objectid and type values above, which is where we could go into trouble. If nritems is 0, just set found_next to 1 anyway as it will make us insert a csum item covering our whole extent (or the whole leaf) when the tree is empty. Signed-off-by: -
Wang Shilong authored
In close_ctree(), after we have stopped all workers,there maybe still some read requests(for example readahead) to submit and this *maybe* trigger an oops that user reported before: kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/async-thread.c:619! By hacking codes, i can reproduce this problem with one cpu available. We fix this potential problem by invalidating all btree inode pages before stopping all workers. Thanks to Miao for pointing out this problem. Signed-off-by:
-
Tsutomu Itoh authored
In btrfs_create_tree(), if btrfs_insert_root() fails, we should free root->commit_root. Reported-by:
Alex Lyakas <alex@zadarastorage.com> Signed-off-by:
Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by:
-
ZhangZhen authored
posix_acl_xattr_set() already does the check, and it's the only way to feed in an ACL from userspace. So the check here is useless, remove it. Signed-off-by:
-
Anand Jain authored
This fix will ensure all SB copies on the disk is zeroed when the disk is intentionally removed. This helps to better manage disks in the user land. This version of patch also merges the Zach patch as below. btrfs: don't double brelse on device rm Signed-off-by:
Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Miao Xie authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
This is a continuation of the previous changes titled: Btrfs: fix incremental send's decision to delay a dir move/rename Btrfs: part 2, fix incremental send's decision to delay a dir move/rename There's a few more cases where a directory rename/move must be delayed which was previously overlooked. If our immediate ancestor has a lower inode number than ours and it doesn't have a delayed rename/move operation associated to it, it doesn't mean there isn't any non-direct ancestor of our current inode that needs to be renamed/moved before our current inode (i.e. with a higher inode number than ours). So we can't stop the search if our immediate ancestor has a lower inode number than ours, we need to navigate the directory hierarchy upwards until we hit the root or: 1) find an ancestor with an higher inode number that was renamed/moved in the send root too (or already has a pending rename/move registered); 2) find an ancestor that is a new directory (higher inode number than ours and exists only in the send root). Reproducer for case 1) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/e $ mkdir /mnt/a/c/d/f $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/d/2b $ mkdir /mnt/a/x $ mkdir /mnt/a/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/a/x /mnt/a/y $ mv /mnt/a/c/d/2b/e /mnt/a/c/d/2b/2e $ mv /mnt/a/c/d /mnt/a/h/2d $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/h/2d/2b/2c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send Simple reproducer for case 2) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir /mnt/a/c $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/b2 $ mkdir /mnt/a/e $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/a/c/b2 /mnt/a/e/b3 $ mkdir /mnt/a/e/b3/f $ mkdir /mnt/a/h $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/e/b3/f/c2 $ mv /mnt/a/e /mnt/a/h/e2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send Another simple reproducer for case 2) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir /mnt/a/c $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/d $ mkdir /mnt/a/c/e $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/d/f $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/g $ mv /mnt/a/c/e /mnt/a/b/g/e2 $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/b/d/f/c2 $ mv /mnt/a/b/d/f /mnt/a/b/g/e2/f2 $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send More complex reproducer for case 2) $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/e $ mkdir /mnt/a/c/d/f $ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/d/2b $ mkdir /mnt/a/x $ mkdir /mnt/a/y $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mv /mnt/a/x /mnt/a/y $ mv /mnt/a/c/d/2b/e /mnt/a/c/d/2b/2e $ mv /mnt/a/c/d /mnt/a/h/2d $ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/h/2d/2b/2c $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send For both cases the incremental send would enter an infinite loop when building path strings. While solving these cases, this change also re-implements the code to detect when directory moves/renames should be delayed. Instead of dealing with several specific cases separately, it's now more generic handling all cases with a simple detection algorithm and if when applying a delayed move/rename there's a path loop detected, it further delays the move/rename registering a new ancestor inode as the dependency inode (so our rename happens after that ancestor is renamed). Tests for these cases is being added to xfstests too. Signed-off-by: -
Filipe Manana authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
If we have directories with a pending move/rename operation, we must take into account any orphan directories that got created before executing the pending move/rename. Those orphan directories are directories with an inode number higher then the current send progress and that don't exist in the parent snapshot, they are created before current progress reaches their inode number, with a generated name of the form oN-M-I and at the root of the filesystem tree, and later when progress matches their inode number, moved/renamed to their final location. Reproducer: $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd $ mount /dev/sdd /mnt $ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b/c/d $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/e $ mv /mnt/a/b/c /mnt/a/b/e/CC $ mkdir /mnt/a/b/e/CC/d/f $ mkdir /mnt/a/g $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1 $ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send $ mkdir /mnt/a/g/h $ mv /mnt/a/b/e /mnt/a/g/h/EE $ mv /mnt/a/g/h/EE/CC/d /mnt/a/g/h/EE/DD $ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2 $ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send The second receive command failed with the following error: ERROR: rename a/b/e/CC/d -> o264-7-0/EE/DD failed. No such file or directory A test case for xfstests follows soon. Signed-off-by: -
Filipe Manana authored
Regardless of whether the caller is interested or not in knowing the inode's generation (dir_gen != NULL), get_first_ref always does a btree lookup to get the inode item. Avoid this useless lookup if dir_gen parameter is NULL (which is in some cases). Signed-off-by:
-
Gui Hecheng authored
For RAID0,5,6,10, For system chunk, there shouldn't be too many stripes to make a btrfs_chunk that exceeds BTRFS_SYSTEM_CHUNK_ARRAY_SIZE For data/meta chunk, there shouldn't be too many stripes to make a btrfs_chunk that exceeds a leaf. Signed-off-by:
Gui Hecheng <guihc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by:
-
