1. 06 Oct, 2009 5 commits
  2. 05 Oct, 2009 3 commits
    • Rajendra Nayak's avatar
      omap: Lock DPLL5 at boot · 7a66a39b
      Rajendra Nayak authored
      Lock DPLL5 at 120MHz at boot. The USBHOST 120MHz f-clock and
      USBTLL f-clock are the only users of this DPLL, and 120MHz is
      is the only recommended rate for these clocks.
      
      With this patch, the 60 MHz ULPI clock is generated correctly.
      
      Tested on an OMAP3430 SDP.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarRajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAnand Gadiyar <gadiyar@ti.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarPaul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
      7a66a39b
    • Tony Lindgren's avatar
      omap: Fix incorrect 730 vs 850 detection · a9f82d10
      Tony Lindgren authored
      Commit cd922049 added
      support for omap850. However, the patch accidentally
      removed the wrong ifdef:
      
       #  define cpu_is_omap730()		1
       # endif
       #endif
      +#else
      +# if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP850)
      +#  undef  cpu_is_omap850
      +#  define cpu_is_omap850()		1
      +# endif
      +#endif
      
      ...
      
       void omap2_check_revision(void);
      
       #endif    /* defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2) || defined(CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3) */
      -
      -#endif
      
      Instead of removing removing the #endif at the end of the file,
      the #endif before #else should have been removed.
      
      But we cannot have multiple #else statements as pointed out by
      Alistair Buxton <a.j.buxton@gmail.com>. So the fix is to:
      
      - remove the non-multi-omap special handling, as we need to
        detect between omap730 and omap850 anyways.
      
      - add the missing #endif back to the end of the file
      Reported-by: default avatarSanjeev Premi <premi@ti.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
      a9f82d10
    • Linus Torvalds's avatar
      Linux 2.6.32-rc3 · 374576a8
      Linus Torvalds authored
      I'm skipping -rc2 because the -rc1 Makefile mistakenly said -rc2, so in
      order to avoid confusion, I'm jumping from -rc1 to -rc3.  That way, when
      'uname' (or an oops report) says 2.6.32-rc2, there's no confusion about
      whether people perhaps meant -rc1 or -rc2.
      374576a8
  3. 04 Oct, 2009 26 commits
  4. 03 Oct, 2009 6 commits