slapconfiguration: returns also slapuser
Why not use the userinfo recipe ?
Simply because it was unknown to me and people to whom I talked about my need... First I wanted to create a new recipe, called something like "extra-partition-information", but I was told not to multiply the recipes.
Research Skill : 0. I'm gonna fix it.
Thanks, please also revert this commit, just to avoid information/implementation duplication.
Re-reading the doc of this recipe, I realise the intent may not be clear: the intent is not to contain all parameters of the partition (at least, that's not the intent I had when I implemented this recipe).
The intent was to just allow accessing whatever the master would make available to this partition as part of its "parameters".
I think it is not nice that the master is what gives us the IP list, which really belong to the partition: master should never need to even know these addresses to begin with. IPs should be provided locally by slapos commands, and never leave the computer. Likewise for all these
tap*values. Then, they would not belong anymore to this recipe either, which would be left with basically:
configuration.*for easier transition from xml to json-in-xml and someday hopefully bare json)
instance-title(didn't know/remember these existed, but they do belong to what the master know and can tell us about ourselves)
(and I just realised you already did revert this commit... sorry for the noise)